ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE AUDITOR INSPECTORATE OF NORTH SUMATRA PROVINCE WITH AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE AS A MODERATING VARIABLE
Main Article Content
Tuti Rahmawati
Keulana Erwin
Muammar Khaddafi
This research aims to determine the factors that influence the performance of inspectorate auditors in North Sumatra province with auditor independence as a moderating variable. This type of research is causality research, namely research that aims to analyze possible cause-and-effect relationships based on observations. This research was conducted using primary data with a survey method obtained through distributing questionnaires to auditors. The results of this research are that the first hypothesis is accepted, the Experience variable (X1) has a significant effect on the Auditor Performance variable (Y). The second hypothesis is accepted, the Knowledge variable (X2) has a significant effect on the Auditor Performance variable (Y). The third hypothesis is rejected, The Auditor Motivation variable (X3) has no significant effect on the Auditor Performance variable (Y). The fourth hypothesis is accepted, meaning that Experience (X1), Knowledge (X2), Auditor Motivation (X3) and Independence (Z) have a significant effect together (simultaneously) on the Auditor Performance variable (Y). The fifth hypothesis is accepted. The Independence variable (Z) is a moderator variable that influences the relationship between Experience (X1) and Auditor Performance (Y). The sixth hypothesis is accepted. The Independence variable (Z) is a moderator variable that influences the relationship between Knowledge (X2) and Auditor Performance (Y). The seventh hypothesis is rejected. The independence variable (Z) is not a moderator variable that influences the relationship between Auditor Motivation (X3) and Auditor Performance (Y). In order for the experience of auditors at the North Sumatra Provincial Inspectorate to be of higher quality, it is best to pay attention to the level of education and provide training regarding the implementation of audits and understanding the regulations as an auditor. So that auditors understand better and can carry out their duties well, because the knowledge and education obtained to audit requires a lot of experience. Apart from that, an auditor will learn a lot from the various cases he handles so that the auditor's performance can be of high quality. because the knowledge and education obtained to audit requires a lot of experience. Apart from that, an auditor will learn a lot from the various cases he handles so that the auditor's performance can be of high quality. because the knowledge and education obtained to audit requires a lot of experience. Apart from that, an auditor will learn a lot from the various cases he handles so that the auditor's performance can be of high quality.
Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara. (2009). Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia.
Bandung: Penerbit Refika Aditama.
Ardiani, Ika S. dan Wibowo, Ricky Satria. (2011). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Independensi Penampilan Akuntan Publik. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi. Vol. 3 No. 2, September 2011, pp. 90-100. Jurusan Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Semarang. Semarang
Arens, Alvin A., & Elder, Randal J., Beasley, Mark S. (2014). Auditing and Assurances Services – An Integrated Approach. Edisi keduabelas. Prentice Hall
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Boynton, Williams C., Raymond N., Johnson dan Kell, Walter G, (2002). Modern Auditing, Edisi Ketujuh, Jilid I, Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta.
Dewi, N. M. W. I., & Sudana, I. P. (2018). Pengaruh Pengalaman, Due Professional Care dan Akuntabilitas Auditor Pada Kualitas Audit. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 22(1), 438-463
Harhinto, Teguh. (2004). Pengaruh Keahlian dan Independensi Terhadap Kualitas Audit Studi Empiris. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
Herliansyah, Yudhi. Meifida Ilyas. (2006). Pengaruh Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Penggunaan Bukti Tidak Relevan Dalam Auditor Judgment. Jurnal. SNA IX. Padang.
Ida Suraida. (2005). Pengaruh Etika, Kompetensi, Pengalaman Audit dan Risiko Audit terhadap Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor dan Ketepatan Pemberian Opini Akuntan Publik. Jurnal Sosiohumaniora, vol. 7 No. 3, November 2005:186-202.
Kurnia, W., Khomsiyah, K., & Sofie, S. (2014). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, Tekanan Waktu, Dan Etika Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi, 1(2), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.25105/jat.v1i2.4826
Kusharyanti. (2003). Temuan Penelitian Mengenai Kualitas Audit dan Kemungkinan Topik Penelitian di Masa Datang. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Manajemen (Desember). Hal.25-60.
Luthans, Fred. (2005). Perilaku Organisasi Edisi Sepuluh. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Andi
Mahsun, Mohamad. (2006). Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik Edisi Pertama. BPFE
: Yogyakarta.
Mulyadi. (2010). Sistem Akuntansi, Edisi ke-3, Cetakan ke-5. Penerbit Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
OK Henry Akui Inspektorat Lemah Menangani Kasus, Ini Alasannya - Halaman 2 - Tribun Medan (tribunnews.com) : Rabu, 7 Juli 2021 (16.42)
Robbins, P. Stephen. (2004). Perilaku Organisasi. Penerbit Erlangga. Jakarta. Robbins, Stephen P., Judge, dan Timothy A. (2008). Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta:
Salemba Empat.
Singgih, M. E., & Bawono, I. R. (2010). Pengaruh Independensi, Pengalaman, Due Professional Care dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIII. Purwokerto
Soegoto Eddy, Soeryanto, (2009). Enterpreneurship, Edisi Pertama, Jakarta : PT. Elek Media Komputindo.
Sucipto, (2007). Dasar-dasar Audit.Yogyakarta : BPFE
Sucipto, Andre. (2007). Analisis Pengaruh Pengetahuan Dan Pengalaman Terhadap Kemampuan Akuntan Pemeriksa Dalam Mendeteksi Kekeliruan Pada KAP di Surabaya. Surabaya : Bagian Penerbit Universitas Petra Surabaya
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D, Alfabeta, Bandung.
Suryabratha, S. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta Website | Inspektorat Provinsi Sumatera Utara (sumutprov.go.id).
