THE EFFECTIVE TEACHING TECHNIQUE OF SCIENCE SUBJECTS
Main Article Content
Abdullah haqmal
Mirwais Yahyazai
Asadullah Torabi
Mohammad Yaqoob Sarfaraz
Multiple researches have proven that teachers have a profound impact on student gaining knowledge. After multivariate, longitudinal analyses of colleges, class sizes, instructors, and different results, Wright et al. (1997) concluded ‘‘variations in teacher effectiveness were located to be the dominant aspect affecting scholar academic benefit’’ (p. 66). Figuring out and separating the unique characteristics that affect teacher effectiveness and thereby pupil success is difficult. If strategies hired by means of effective instructors may be remoted, however, after which taught to less effective teachers, student gaining knowledge of need to enhance. The simple goal of coaching any concern is to bring about desired alternate in conduct. The exchange in behavior of infant could be indicated via youngsters’ capability to learn correctly. That is only possible by using adopting diverse techniques of coaching. Some broadly used techniques of science coaching have mentioned in this text.
Dr. Chandana Pattnaik, D. C. A. C., Dr. Shrima Banerjee. (2007). METHODS OF TEACHING SCIENCE. M.A EDUCATION, V, 52.
Güneş, T., Dilek, N. Ş., Çelikoğlu, M., Demir, E. S. J. P.-S., & Sciences, B. (2011). The using levels of the teaching methods and techniques by teachers. 15, 1092-1096.
Knight, J. K., & Wood, W. B. J. C. b. e. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. 4(4), 298-310.
Kubiatko, M., Vaculová, I. J. E. E. S., Social, T. P. B., & Studies, E. (2011). Project-based learning: characteristic and the experiences with application in the science subjects. 3(1), 65-74.
Li, J., & Klahr, D. J. T. s. i. t. s. c. (2006). The psychology of scientific thinking: Implications for science teaching and learning. 307-329.
Mohan, R. (2019). Innovative science teaching: PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
O. Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., Mukherjee, N. J. M. i. E., & evolution. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. 9(1), 20-32.
Parikh, N. D. J. T. I. J. o. I. P. (2016). Effectiveness of teaching through mind mapping technique. 3(3), 148-156.
Sadeghi, R., Sedaghat, M. M., Ahmadi, F. S. J. J. o. a. i. m. e., & professionalism. (2014). Comparison of the effect of lecture and blended teaching methods on students’ learning and satisfaction. 2(4), 146.
Sakliressy, M. T., Sunarno, W., & Nurosyid, F. J. J. I. P. F. A.-B. (2021). Students scientific attitude in learning physics using problem based learning model with experimental and project methods. 10(1), 59-70.
Sanders, E. R. J. J. (2012). Aseptic laboratory techniques: plating methods. (63), e3064.
Sree, K. J. (2010). Methods of teaching science: Discovery publishing house.
Weinstein, Y., Madan, C. R., Sumeracki, M. A. J. C. r. p., & implications. (2018). Teaching the science of learning. 3, 1-17.
