Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): December
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

MAPPING VALUE ADDED ARABICA COFFEE PROCESSED PRODUCTS IN ACEH TENGAH

Authors

Fadli , Emmia Tambarta Kembaren , Irada Sinta

DOI:

10.54443/ijebas.v1i1.28

Published:

2021-11-05

Downloads

Abstract

Coffee is one of the plantation commodities that has an important role in foreign trade. In 1712, Indonesian coffee plantations were traded for the first time to the Netherlands (KP Gayo, 2016). Aceh coffee, which is better known internationally is the type of Gayo Arabica coffee because it has a distinctive aroma and taste. This research uses descriptive quantitative research methods. This research was conducted in Aceh Tengah. This is because Aceh Tengah is one of the main production Aceh Tengah. The objects of this research are the trade office, the agriculture office, coffee expert staff, Gayo arabica coffee farmers and the four green been coffee agroindustry and coffee grounds which have the largest export quotas in Bener Meriah Regency, namely KBQ Baburrayyan, Oro Coffee Cooperative, and PT Olam Coffee. The data collection method used is in-depth interviews with several key persons belonging to the research object. The results showed that the output value obtained from pumpkin coffee products was Rp. 27,176 per Kg with an added value of Rp. 22,176 per Kg. The output value obtained from green bean products is Rp. 56,950/Kg with an added value of Rp. 13,050/Kg. The output value obtained from the Gayo Arabica coffee powder product is Rp. 123.500/Kg with an added value of Rp. 36.500/Kg. 176 per Kg with an added value of Rp. 22,176 per Kg. The output value obtained from green bean products is Rp. 56,950/Kg with an added value of Rp. 13,050/Kg. The output value obtained from the Gayo Arabica coffee powder product is Rp. 123.500/Kg with an added value of Rp. 36.500/Kg. 176 per Kg with an added value of Rp. 22,176 per Kg. The output value obtained from green bean products is Rp. 56,950/Kg with an added value of Rp. 13,050/Kg. The output value obtained from the Gayo Arabica coffee powder product is Rp. 123.500/Kg with an added value of Rp. 36.500/Kg.

Keywords:

Gayo Arabica Coffee Processing Added Value

References

[AEKI] Asosiasi Eksportir Kopi Indonesia. 2020. Laporan Pasar Kopi. Jakarta (ID) : AEKI.

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Aceh Tengah. 2019. Aceh Dalam Angka. Provinsi Aceh: BPS.

Hayami, Y., Kawagoe, T., & Morooka, Y. (1987). Agricultural Marketing and Processing in Upland Java A Perspective From A Sunda Village (Masdjidin Siregar (ed.); 8th ed.). Bogor: CGPRT Center.

Kebun Percobaan Kopi Gayo. 2016. Kopi Gayo. Modul. Bener Meriah

Saragih, B. 2010. Suara Agribisnis : Kumpulan Pemikiran Bungaran Saragih. Jakarta: PT Permata Wacana Lestari.

Sembiring, N., I K. Satriawan, dan I A. M. Tuningrat. 2014. Nilai Tambah Proses Pengolahan KopiArabika Secara Basah (West Indischee Bereding) dan Kering (Ost Indischee Bereding) DiKecamatan Kintamani, Bangli. Jurnal Rekayasa Dan Manajemen Agroindustri Vol (4).

Soekartawi. 2016. Analisis Usahatani. Jakarta : UI-Press.

Sudjarmoko, B. 2013. Prospek Pengembangan Industrialisasi Kopi Indonesia. Sirinov, 1(3), 99–110.

Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Susanti A.A, Akbar, 2018. Outlook Kopi. Jakarta: Kementrian Pertanian.

Tambarta, E., Tinaprilla, N., & Adhi, A. K. (2016). Analysis Added-ValueAnd Development Strategic of Gayo Coffe Products in Bener Meriah Aceh. 5(11), 515–519.

Author Biographies

Fadli, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Malikussaleh

Author Origin : Indonesia

Emmia Tambarta Kembaren, Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Malikussaleh

Author Origin : Indonesia

Irada Sinta, Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Malikussaleh

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Fadli, F., Tambarta Kembaren, E. ., & Sinta, I. . (2021). MAPPING VALUE ADDED ARABICA COFFEE PROCESSED PRODUCTS IN ACEH TENGAH. International Journal of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management and Sharia Administration (IJEBAS), 1(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.54443/ijebas.v1i1.28