QUALITY STUDY OF ARABICA COFFEE COMMODITY (Coffea arabica L.) BASED ON SNI COFFEE BEANS No. 01-2907-2008 REVIEWED FROM THE ASPECT OF GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES (GAP) IN SIMALUNGUN REGENCY
Main Article Content
Yenfrida Silitonga
Nurhayati
Muhammad Rizwan
The problem currently faced by Indonesian coffee in the international market is the low quality of coffee generally produced by community plantations. The quality of coffee is still low because post-harvest processing still produces random coffee, namely coffee beans produced with very simple methods and facilities, relatively high water content and still mixed with other ingredients in relatively large quantities. To improve the quality of coffee beans, the application of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) was chosen as a framework for analyzing coffee quality, because GAP plays a crucial role in ensuring sustainable and quality agricultural practices. This study aims to determine the extent to which GAP is applied to Arabica coffee cultivation in Simalungun Regency and to find out that the application of GAP can improve coffee quality in accordance with the Indonesian Coffee SNI. The research method used is a descriptive method. The basis for selecting the research location was determined intentionally (purposive method) in Simalungun Regency. The sample in this study was coffee farmers totaling 75 respondents. Data analysis was carried out descriptively and multiple linear regression tests. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that coffee farmers in Simalungun Regency have applied GAP in cultivating coffee plants, where the highest GAP application is found in plant varieties with a score of 4.04 and planting coffee at an altitude that is in accordance with a score of 4, while the lowest GAP application is found in harvesting techniques with a score of 3.55, where there are still many farmers who harvest without considering factors that can affect the quality of the coffee beans produced. The water content of coffee beans in Simalungun Regency is around 11.27%. This is in accordance with the SNI 01-2907-2008 standard, namely a maximum water content of 12.5%. The defect value of koi beans in Simalungun Regency is predominantly quality 2, which is 56% and quality 1 is 33.33%. Coffee beans with quality 1 and 2 have good quality. The size of coffee beans in Simalungun Regency is predominantly medium, which is 69.33% and large size is 26.67%. Partially, the application of Good Agricultural Practices, namely plant varieties, coffee land suitability, altitude, fertilization, pest and disease control have a significant effect on the quality of coffee beans, while harvesting techniques do not have a significant effect on the quality of coffee beans. Simultaneously, the application of Good Agricultural Practices (plant varieties, coffee land suitability, altitude, fertilization, pest and disease control and harvesting techniques have a significant effect on the quality of coffee beans.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2021. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Barbosa, J. N., Borem, F. M., Cirillo, M. A., Malta, M. R., Alvarenga, A. A., & Alves, H. M. R. 2019. Coffee quality and its interactions with environmental factors in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(5), 181–190.
BPS. 2024. Ekspor Kopi Menurut Negara Tujuan Utama 2000 – 2023. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia.
Clemente, J.M., Martinez, H.E.P., Alves, L.C., Finger, P.L. & Cecon, P.R. 2019. Effects of nitrogen and potassium on the chemical composition of coffee beans and on beverage quality. Maringá 37(3), 297–305.
Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan Kementerian Pertanian. 2021. Statistik Perkebunan IndonesiaKomoditas Kopi 2020-2021. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan.
Fernadez, Regi et al. 2024. “Tingkat Adopsi Good Agriculture Practices (Gap) Tanaman Kopi Oleh Kelompok Tani Tunas Jaya Dan Bima Saktal Di Desa Iv Suku Menanti Kabupaten Rejang Lebong.” Communnity Development Journal 5(2): 2995–3001.
Fitriani, D. 2023. Eksistensi Budaya Minum Kopi dari Era Kolonial hingga Era Modern. Daya Nasional Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 1(3): 114-119.
Ghozali, Imam. 2022. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete Dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Harni, R., Samsudin, W. Amaria, G. Indriati, F. Soesanthy, Khaerati, E. Taufiq, A. M. Hasibuan dan A. D. Hapsari. 2020. Teknologi Pengendalian Hama dan Penyakit Tanaman Kopi. Jakarta : IAARD Press.
Jessy, M.D. 2019. Potassium management in plantation crops with special reference to tea, coffee, and rubber. Karnatak 5 Agric. Sci., 24(1), 67–74.
Kansrini, Y., Febrimeli, D. dan Mulyani P.W. (2020). ). Tingkat Adopsi Budidaya yang baik (GOOD AGRICULTURE PRACTICES) Tanaman Kopi Arabika oleh Petani di Kabupaten Tapanuli Selatan. Jurnal Paradigma Agribisnis.
Martins, L.D., Machado, L.S., Tomas, M.A., & do Amaral, J.F.T. 2020. The nutritional efficiency of Coffea spp. A review. Afr. J. Biothecnol., 14(9), 728–734.
Mulato, S. 2021. Peningkatan Mutu Biji Kopi Rakyat dengan Pengolahan Semi Basah Berbasis Produksi Bersih. Jurnal Agrotek Vol. 4:76-90.
Nainggolan P. 2023. Kopi Arabika Sumatera Utara Komoditas Eksport untuk Kesejahteraan Petani. BRIN.
Nugroho, D., Mawardi, S., Yusianto, dan Arimersetiowati, R. 2019. Karakterisasi mutu fisik dan cita rasa biji kopi Arabika varietas Maragogip (Coffea arabica L. var. Maragogype Hort. ex Froehner) dan seleksi pohon induk di Jawa Timur. Pelita Perkebunan, 28(1), 1–13.
Peraturan Menteri Pertanian. 2014. “Peraturan Menteri Pertanian Republik Indonesia Nomor 49/Permentan/OT.140/4/2014 Tentang Pedoman Teknis Budidaya Kopi yang Baik (good agriculture practices /gap on coffee).” Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia: 72.
[PUSDATIN] Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Pertanian.2019. Buku Outlook Komoditas Perkebunan Kopi 2021. Jakarta: Portal Epublikasi Pertanian.
Rahasbistara, M.. R. W dan N. K. L. S. Melani, 2024. Review: Pengaruh Efektivitas Ekstrak Kopi Arabika sebagai Antioksidan dan Bentuk Sediaan Farmakologi. Al-Mikraj Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora Vol. 5(1): 585-595.
Randriani, E., Dani, dan Wardiana, E. 2024. Evaluasi ukuran biji beras, kadar kafein, dan mutu cita rasa lima kultivar kopi Arabika. J. TIDP, 1(1), 49-56.
Saefudin, dan Wardiana, E. 2023. Pengaruh varietas dan tingkat kematangan buah terhadap perkecambahan dan fisik benih kopi Arabika. Buletin Ristri, 4 (3), 245-256.
Salima, R. A. Karim, Sugianto. 2022. Evaluasi kriteria kesesuaian lahan kopi Arabika Gayo 2 di Dataran Tinggi Gayo. Jurnal MSDL, Vol. 1 (2) : 194-206.
Silalahi, A. V. dan R. I. Rosyadi. 2024. Evaluasi Kesesuaian Lahan Kopi Robusta (Coffea canephora) Desa Pucaksari Kecamatan Busungbiu Kabupaten Buleleng Menggunakan Analisis Sistem Informasi Geografi. Spatial : Wahana Komunikasi dan Informasi Geografi, 21-30.
Silva, S. de A., de Queiroz, D. M., Ferreira, W. P. M., Corrêa, P. C., & Rufino, J. L. dos S. 2019. Mapping the potential beverage quality of coffee produced in the Zona da Mata, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 96: 3098–3108.
SNI (Standar Nasional Indonesia). Biji Kopi. SNI 01-2907-2008. Jakarta : Badan Standarisasi Nasional.
Statmat. “Pengertian dan 4 Jenis Skala Pengukuran dalam Statistika”. 2020. <https://www.statmat.net/pengertian-dan-jenis-skala-pengukuran/>
Sugiyono. 2021. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung : CF. Alfabeta.
Supriadi, H., Rusli, dan Heryana, N. 2019. Kesesuaian lahan untuk tanaman kopi. In Rubiyo, Syafaruddin, B. Martono, R. Harni, U. Daras, & E. Wardiana (Eds.), Bunga Rampai: Inovasi Teknologi Tanaman Kopi untuk Perkebunan Rakyat (pp. 47-56). Sukabumi: Unit Penerbitan dan Publikasi Balittri.
Supriadi, H., Randriani, E., dan Towaha, J. 2019. Korelasi antara ketinggian tempat, sifat kimia tanah, dan mutu fisik biji kopi Arabika di dataran tinggi garut. J. TIDP, 3(1), 45-52.
Syamsu, B. 2022. Memahami Makna Kopi Dalam Perilaku Keseharian. DIMENSI Jurnal of Sociology Vol. 11(1): 23-30.
Towaha, J., Purwanto, E. H., dan Supriadi, H. 2019. Atribut kualitas kopi Arabika pada tiga ketinggian tempat di Kabupaten Garut. J. TIDP, 2(1): 29-34.
