ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD WITH EXTERNAL AUDIT QUALITY AS A MODERATING VARIABLE IN PROPERTY AND REAL ESTATE COMPANIES LISTED ON THE IDX IN 2019-2023
DOI:
10.54443/ijebas.v5i6.4809Published:
2025-12-24Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to analyze and determine the influence of the elements of the Fraud Hexagon Theory in detecting financial statement fraud in property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2019 to 2023. Furthermore, this study also aims to determine whether External Audit Quality can be used as a moderating variable in this study. The population in this study was 92 property and real estate companies. Purposive sampling was used to select 29 companies with 145 analysis units. The data used were secondary data derived from company financial reports accessible through the Indonesia Stock Exchange website ( www.idx.co.id ) and related company websites . The results show that Financial Stability partially has a significant positive effect on financial statement fraud and CEO's Educational Background partially has a significant negative effect on financial statement fraud. Meanwhile, Cooperation with Government Projects, Ineffective Monitoring , Change in Auditor , Frequent Number of CEO's Picture have no effect on financial statement fraud. Meanwhile, the results of the Moderated Regression Analysis test in this study indicate that the moderating variable External Audit Quality is only able to moderate the relationship between Financial Stability's influence on Financial Statement Fraud.
Keywords:
Fraud Hexagon Financial Stability CEO's Educational Background Cooperation with Government Projects Ineffective Monitoring Change in Auditor Frequent Number of CEO's Picture Financial Statement Fraud and External Audit QualityReferences
1. ACFE. (2018). Occupational Fraud 2022: A Report to the Nations. Acfe, 1-79.
2. ACFE. (2020). Occupational Fraud 2022: A Report to the Nations. Acfe, 1-87.
3. ACFE. (2022). Occupational Fraud 2022: A Report to the Nations. Acfe, 1-95.
4. ACFE. (2024). Occupational Fraud 2022: A Report to the Nations. Acfe, 1-105.
5. ACFE Chapter Indonesia. (2019). Association of Certified Fraud Examiners: Indonesia Chapter 111. https://acfe-indonesia.or.id/.
6. Adherian Kurnia, A., & Anis, I. (2017). Analisis Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XX.
7. Aditantra, J. W., & Anis, C. (2023). Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dalam Perspektif Fraud Hexagon. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi, Vol. 4 No. 3, p. 634-654. ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jaaayu. DOI: 10.22219/jaa.v6i4.30208.
8. Ali, I., Hesty, E. Z., Januar, E. P., Indra, G. S. (2024). Analisis Fraud Hexagon Theory Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dengan Kualitas Audit Sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi Empiris Terhadap Perusahaan Sub Sektor Makanan Dan Minuman Yang Terdaftar di BEI Periode 2020-2023). Jurnal Accounting Scienceand Techbology Post Graduate Accounting. Vol. 4 No. 2 Hal: 156-174. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jast.v4i2.12487.g5608
9. Anggarani, D., Pradita, W., Khojanah, H., & Wiwin, P. (2023). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Triangle Terhadap Laporan Keuangan (Studi kasus Perusahaan Properti di Vursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2018-2020). Vol. 9 No.1 (2023) Edisi Februarip-ISSN 2339-1502 e-ISSN 2723-1070.
10. Apriliana, S., & Agustina, L. (2017). The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant through Fraud Pentagon Approach. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 9(2), 154– 165. https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v7i1.4036.
11. Bifadli, I., Hardi & Ferdy, P. (2023). Deteksi Financial Statement Fraud dengan Analisis Fraud Hexagon. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis Vol.16 (No.2) : Hal 112 – 129. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.30813/jab.v16 i2.3585.
12. Deangelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor Size and Audit Quality. In Journal of Accounting and Economics (Vol. 3). North-Holland Publishing Company.
13. De Kort, M. J. J & Vermeulen, Patrick, A. M. (2010). Entrepreneurial decision-makers and the use of biases and heuristics", In Vermeulen, Patrick. A. M. and Curseu, P.L. (Ed.) Entrepreneurial StrategicDecision-MakingA Cognitive Perspective, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp.123-134
14. Dewi, R., & Luthan, E. (2023). Analisis Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dalam Perspektif Teori Fraud Hexagon pada Perusahaan Industri Keuangan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2017-2022. Al-Kharaj: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah, 2680-2696.
16. Iqbal, M., & Murtanto. (2016). Analisa Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Fraud Triangle Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Property dan Real Estate yang Terdafatr di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan 2016. ISSN (E) : 2540-7589 ISSN (P) : 2460-8696
17. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics.
18. Mukaromah & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2021). Fraud Hexagon Theory dalam Mendeteksi Fraud Laporan Keuangan pada Perbankan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2015-2019. 14(1), 61–72.
19. Norbarani, L., dan Rahardjo, S. N. (2011). Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Analisis Fraud Triangle yang Diadopsi dalam SAS No. 99. Researchgate Journal.
20. Oleson, J. C. (1998). The crimes of genius: A self-report study of offending in high-IQ individuals. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
21. Oleson, J.C. (2004). Sipping Coffee with a Serial Killer: On Conducting Life History Interviews with a Criminal GeniusInterviews with a Criminal Genius. The Qualitative Report, 9(2), 192-215. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2004.1925
22. Putri, A., C., & Sugi., S (2023). Kemampuan Kualitas Audit Memoderasi Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statements. Jurnal Bina Akuntansi, Juli 2023, Vol.10 No.2 Hal 732-757
23. Rachmawati, A., & Raharja, S. (2023). Faktor Penentu Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan Dalam Perspektif Fraud Hexagon. REVIEW EKOMBIS: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, doi: https://doi.org/10.37676/ekombis.v12i1
24. Rochmah, U. N. F. K., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2025). Analysis of Audit Tenure, CEO Education, and Ineffective Monitoring on Fraudulent Financial Statement. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 35(7), 2130-2143
25. Sagala, S. G., & Siagian, V. (2021). Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon Model Terhadap Fraudulent Laporan Keuangan pada Perusahaan Sub Sektor Makanan dan Minuman yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2016-2019. 13(November), 245–259. http://journal.maranatha.edu
26. Santoso, B. (2015). Keagenan (Agency) Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar, Teori, dan Problematika Hukum Keagenan. Ghalia Indonesia.
27. Schrand, C., & Zechman, S. (2012). Kepercayaan Diri Eksekutif yang Berlebihan dan Jalan Licin Menuju Kesalahan Pelaporan Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Ekonomi, 53(1), hlm. 311-329
28. Setyono, D., Eko, H., Sri, W., & Bima, C. P. (2023). Penggunaan Fraud Hexagon dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Owner: Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi e –ISSN : 2548-9224 | p–ISSN : 2548-7507 Volume 7 Nomor 2, April 2023 DOI : https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i2.1325.
29. Shelton, Austin M. (2014). Analysis of Capabilities Attributed to the Fraud Diamond. Undergraduate Honors Theses.
30. Siregar, A., & Etty, M. (2022). Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Hexagon Terhadap Financial Statement Fraud. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, Vol. 6 No. 2 2022, 211-228 e2579-9991, p2579-9975 http://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/jka.
31. Selano, E., Budianto, T.Rr., Puruwita, W. (2017). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Laporan Keuangan pada Perusahaan Property, Real Estate and Building yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2013-2015. Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer (JAKO) Vol 9 No. 2 Hal. 192-182.
32. Sumbari, S., Kamaliah,K., Ruhul, F. (2023). Analysis of Fraud Hexagon to Detect Fraud on Financial Statement. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi dan Bisnis Terkini https://current.ejournal.unri.ac.id. Vol. 4, No. 1, Maret 2023, pp. 179-196 E ISSN2721-1819 | P ISSN2721-2416 https://doi.org/10.31258/current.4.1.179-196.
33. Tiffani, L., & Marfuah, M. (2015). Deteksi financial statement fraud dengan analisis fraud triangle pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di bursa efek Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing Indonesia, 19(2), 112–125.
34. Trisnawati, A. B. A., & Rizka, F. (2024). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statement dengan Moderasi Kualitas Audit. AKUNESA: Jurnal Akuntansi Unesa. Vol 13, No 1, September 2024. Vol 13, No 1, http://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/akunesa/index
35. Utami, E. R., & Pusparini, N. O. (2019), “The Analysis of Fraud Pentagon Theory and Financial Distress for Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting in Banking Sector in Indonesia”, 5th International Conference of Accounting and Finance (ICAF 2019), Vol. 8 No. 8, hal. 237–242.
36. Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12- 2017-0128.
37. Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud, 74(12), 38–42.
38. Xiaowei, VK, & Zhang, J. (2010). The effect of managerial Education and firm-ownership structure. Chinese Economy, 43(6), 34-53
39. Ying, C. H., & Yeung, C. M. (2014). CEO Education and Firm Performance: Evidence From Hong Kong. Hong Kong Baptist Universtity, 1.
40. Yulianti, P. S. R., Widowati, Y. S., & Prapti, L. (2019). Influence Of Fraud Pentagon Toward Fraudulent Financial Reporting In Indonesia An Empirical Study On Financial Sector Listed In Indonesian Stock Exchange. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, 8, 8.
41. Yunita, A., & Julia (2022). The Effect of Hexagon Fraud in Detecting Fraud Financial Statements (Empirical Study on Financial Sector Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2017-2021). International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research. 3 (10), 2112 – 2124. doi: 10.11594/ijmaber.03.10.23.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nuri Wandasari, Rina Br Bukit, Narumondang Bulan Siregar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
