Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): June
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

AN EVALUATIVE STUDY OF THE MILLENNIAL FARMERS CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM BY CV PENDAWA KENCANA MULTIFARM USING THE CIPPO MODEL

Authors

Rena Suryaningsih , R Hermawan , Sukadi

DOI:

10.5281/zenodo.20703644

Published:

2026-06-15

Downloads

Abstract

The agricultural sector plays a strategic role in national development, particularly in ensuring food security and supporting economic sustainability. However, Indonesia is currently facing a decline in the number of agricultural actors and a regeneration crisis among farmers, especially in the younger generation. In response to this issue, various capacity-building programs for millennial farmers have been implemented, including the program conducted by CV Pendawa Kencana Multifarm. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the millennial farmer capacity development program using the CIPPO evaluation model (Context, Input, Process, Product, Outcome). This research employed a descriptive quantitative approach involving 42 millennial farmer respondents selected through proportional random sampling using the Slovin formula. Data were collected using questionnaires based on a 1–5 Likert scale and analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Program Effectiveness Index (PEI) to measure each CIPPO component. The results show that the program is categorized as effective, with an overall IEP score of 86.87%. Each component also falls within the effective category, with scores of 85.19% for Context, 87.62% for Input, 88.24% for Process, 87.81% for Product, and 85.48% for Outcome. The highest effectiveness was found in the Process component, indicating strong participant engagement and effective implementation of participatory, practice-based learning. Meanwhile, the Context component recorded the lowest score, suggesting the need for improved alignment between program design and participants’ specific needs. Overall, the program has proven effective in improving participants’ knowledge, skills, and farming capacity, as well as contributing to behavioral change and farming sustainability. However, further refinement is needed in the planning stage to enhance contextual accuracy and long-term impact.

Keywords:

program effectiveness millennial farmers capacity development CIPPO, agriculture

References

Ahyar, H., Andriani, H., Sukmana, D. J., et al. (2020). Buku metode penelitian kualitatif & kuantitatif.

Amruddin, Priyanda, R., Agustina, S. T., Ariantini, S. N., Rusmayani, A. L. G. N., & Aslindar, A. D. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Pradina Pustaka.

Badan Penyuluhan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pertanian. (2020). Rencana strategis Badan Penyuluhan dan Pengembangan SDM Pertanian tahun 2020–2024. Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia.

Badan Penyuluhan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Pertanian. (2023). Laporan kinerja BPPSDMP tahun 2023. Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Hasil sensus pertanian 2023: Usaha pertanian perorangan di Indonesia. BPS.

Bahagia, R., Wibowo, R., Susetyo, B., Al-Wahid, A., Teniro, B., & Saripudin, U. (2024). Peran pemuda petani mewujudkan pembangunan pertanian berkelanjutan. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i1.2410

BPPSDMP. (2021). Program petani milenial. Kementerian Pertanian.

BPPSDMP. (2023). Laporan pengembangan sumber daya manusia pertanian. Kementerian Pertanian.

Hasyyati, Z. (2025). Regenerasi petani: Dampak ageing farmers dan modal manusia terhadap produktivitas padi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian Unimal, 8(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.29103/jepu.v8i2.26039

Indonesia. (2012). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2012 tentang Pangan. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.

Kementerian Pertanian. (2021). Strategi pembangunan pertanian berkelanjutan. Kementerian Pertanian RI.

Kompas.com. (2023). Penurunan jumlah petani di Indonesia dan tantangan regenerasi. https://www.kompas.com

Marpaung, N., & Bangun, I. C. (2023). Pentingnya regenerasi petani dalam modernisasi pertanian. Jurnal Kajian Agraria dan Kedaulatan Pangan (JKAKP), 2(2), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.32734/jkakp.v2i2.14195

Purnawirawan, O., Paramita, C., & Sholihah, M. (2019). The application of CIPPO evaluation model in evaluating the performance of School for Producing Entrepreneurs programs in vocational high school. Dalam Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Education and Technology (ISET 2019) (Vol. 443). Atlantis Press.

Rana, M., Islam, M., & Karim, R. (2025). Capacity building and agricultural sustainability: The role of human and social capital. Journal of Agricultural Development, 12(1), 45–60.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Press.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Alfabeta.

Author Biography

Rena Suryaningsih, Politeknik Pembangunan Pertanian Yogyakarta Magelang

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Rena Suryaningsih, Hermawan, R., & Sukadi. (2026). AN EVALUATIVE STUDY OF THE MILLENNIAL FARMERS CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM BY CV PENDAWA KENCANA MULTIFARM USING THE CIPPO MODEL. International Journal of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management and Sharia Administration (IJEBAS), 6(3), 1574–1582. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20703644