ETHICAL CONSEQUENCES OF MODERN HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES: A STUDY OF THE INFLUENCE OF JUSTICE ORGANIZATION TO REPUTATION COMPANY IN PT. SSP MOROWALI CENTRAL SULAWESI

Authors

Nur Indah , Baharuddin Semmaila , H.Baso Amang , Hj.Aryanti Arfah , Muhammad Arif , Tenri Wahyu

DOI:

10.5281/zenodo.20948955

Published:

2026-06-26

Downloads

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the ethical consequences of implementing modern human resource management practices, specifically examining the influence of organizational justice dimensions on the formation of corporate reputation. in PT. SSP Morowali, acompany Which operate in region Central Sulawesi. Method study use approach quantitative with design survey. Sample studyThe sample consisted of 120 employees selected using simple random sampling. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that, both partially and simultaneously, the dimensions of distributive justice, procedural justice, and interactional justice had a positive and significant influence on corporate reputation. Findings This indicates thatimplementation principle justice as runway ethical in human resource management not only impact on welfare employees, but also become strategic factors in building public image and trust in the company. This research contributes to the development of ethical human resource management and serves as a management consideration in formulating sustainable policies oriented towards enhancing the organization's reputation.

Keywords:

Ethics Business Human Resource Management Justice Organization Company Reputation PT. SSP Morowali

References

Adrai, R., & Perkasa, D. H. (2024). Penerapan etika bisnis dan tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan dalam international human resources management. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis Madani, 6(2), 68-85.

Alifian, R. J. H (2025). Manajemen Sdm Kontemporer Strategi, Etika Dan Transformasi Di Era Digital.

Bandung: Widina.

Artha Febriana. (2023). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Strategis. Bandung: Widina.

Basuki, B., Widyanti, R., & Husnurropiq, H. (2023). Peran Moderasi Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Transformasional dengan Keterlibatan Karyawan Pegawai Organisasi Publik. Al-Ulum: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 9(2), 119-131.

Imani, K. N., Hikmawati, Z., Rania, G. M., & Batlayangin, M. (2025, August). Literature Review: Pengaruh Etika Perusahaan Terhadap Loyalitas Karyawan. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Manajemen dan Bisnis (Vol. 5, pp. 298-306).

Kusumastuti, A., Khoiron, A. M., & Achmad, T. A. (2021). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Sleman: Deepublish.

Maulidya, D. (2025). Peran Etika Bisnis Dalam Meningkatkan Kepercayaan Konsumen Dalam Perspektif Syariah. At-Tajir: Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Syariah, 3(1), 41-50.

Monalisa, M., Kusumastuti, S. Y., & Suparyati, A. (2025). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif:: Pengembangan Hipotesis dan Pengujiannya. Jambi: Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Nikotiyanto Dwi Cahyono. (2025). Perilaku organisasi: Strategi pengembangan dan peningkatan kinerja sumber daya manusia. Jakarta: Indonesia Delapan Kreasi Nusa.

Sukmara, A. R. (2025). Perilaku Organisasi. Yogyakarta: Selfietera Indonesia.

Author Biographies

Nur Indah, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Baharuddin Semmaila, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

H.Baso Amang, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Hj.Aryanti Arfah, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Muhammad Arif, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Tenri Wahyu, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Nur Indah, Baharuddin Semmaila, H.Baso Amang, Hj.Aryanti Arfah, Muhammad Arif, & Tenri Wahyu. (2026). ETHICAL CONSEQUENCES OF MODERN HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES: A STUDY OF THE INFLUENCE OF JUSTICE ORGANIZATION TO REPUTATION COMPANY IN PT. SSP MOROWALI CENTRAL SULAWESI. International Journal of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management and Sharia Administration (IJEBAS), 6(4), 1692–1697. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20948955