IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION OF ESG RISK RATINGS: A CASE STUDY OF PT PERTAMINA HULU ENERGI (PHE)

Authors

Sandra Zakiya Dwifitriana , Yudo Anggoro

Published:

2026-07-14

Downloads

Abstract

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance has become essential for oil and gas companies due to the impact of their operations on the environment, communities, employee safety, and governance. As the upstream subholding of PT Pertamina (Persero), PT Pertamina Hulu Energi (PHE) is expected to implement sustainable practices, making the identification of current ESG risk management and areas for improvement important for the company's competitiveness. This study assesses the implementation of ESG risk management at PHE using the MSCI ESG Ratings methodology, addressing how ESG risk is managed under the MSCI Key Issue Framework and which aspects require improvement. Agency Theory and Stakeholder Theory underpin the research. A qualitative case study method was applied, drawing on sustainability and annual reports, company disclosures, MSCI ESG Assessment documents, and surveys and semi-structured interviews with representatives from Compliance, Human Capital, Environment, Safety, and Supply Chain Management divisions. PHE's performance was assessed across seven MSCI Key Issues, followed by a gap analysis. Results show PHE achieved an MSCI ESG Rating of BBB with an Industry Adjusted Score of 5.4 in 2025, an improvement from the previous year, with strong performance in Community Relations, Biodiversity & Land Use, and Toxic Emissions & Waste. Priority areas for improvement include absolute carbon emission reduction targets, measurable health and safety targets, and greater governance transparency.

Keywords:

limate resilience corporate accountability energy transition risk governance stakeholder engagement

References

Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 66(10), 4451–4469.

Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87–103.

Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77(305), 1–19.

Brooks, C., & Oikonomou, I. (2018). The effects of environmental, social, and governance disclosures and performance on firm value: A review of the literature in accounting and finance. British Accounting Review, 50(1), 1–15.

Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53.

Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141.

Eccles, R. G., & Serafeim, G. (2013). The performance frontier: Innovating for a sustainable strategy. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 50–60.

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233.

Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.

International Energy Agency. (2022). Oil and gas industry in net zero transitions. https://www.iea.org/reports/oil-and-gas-industry-in-net-zero-transitions

MSCI. (2023). MSCI ESG ratings methodology. https://www.msci.com/esg-ratings

MSCI. (2024). MSCI ESG ratings methodology. MSCI Inc. https://www.msci.com/our-solutions/esg-investing/esg-ratings

Sustainalytics. (2020). ESG risk ratings methodology. https://www.sustainalytics.com/esg-ratings

Sustainalytics. (2024). ESG risk ratings: Overview and industry insights. https://www.sustainalytics.com

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

World Bank. (2021). ESG integration in financial institutions. https://www.worldbank.org

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.

Author Biographies

Sandra Zakiya Dwifitriana, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Author Origin : Indonesia

Yudo Anggoro, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Sandra Zakiya Dwifitriana, & Yudo Anggoro. (2026). IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION OF ESG RISK RATINGS: A CASE STUDY OF PT PERTAMINA HULU ENERGI (PHE). International Journal of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management and Sharia Administration (IJEBAS), 6(4), 1734–1738. Retrieved from https://radjapublika.com/index.php/IJEBAS/article/view/6008