THE EFFECT OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT ON EMPLOYEE WORK PRODUCTIVITY IN MEDAN CITY
Published:
2024-02-28Downloads
Abstract
This study examines the effect of human resource development on employee work productivity in Medan City. A quantitative explanatory design was employed. Human resource development was measured through education, training, career development, and organizational learning, while work productivity was measured through output quantity, quality, timeliness, efficiency, and work effectiveness. For manuscript-development purposes, the statistical results use an illustrative dataset of 160 employees selected through proportional purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using validity and reliability tests, classical assumption tests, simple linear regression, t-test, and coefficient of determination. The illustrative results show that human resource development has a positive and significant effect on work productivity (β = 0.693; t = 11.71; p < 0.001) and explains 47.7% of productivity variance. Training relevance, equal access to development, career clarity, and continuous learning are the main managerial priorities. The statistical values must be replaced with verified field-survey results before journal submission.
Keywords:
Employee Productivity Human Resource Development Medan Quantitative Research TrainingReferences
Abdullahi, M. S., Raman, K., & Solarin, S. A. (2024). The effect of human resource development practice on employee performance with the mediating role of job satisfaction among academic staff. Heliyon, 10(8), e29821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29821
Aguinis, H., & Kraiger, K. (2009). Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163505
Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2023). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice (16th ed.). Kogan Page.
Barrett, A., & O’Connell, P. J. (2001). Does training generally work? The returns to in-company training. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(3), 647–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979390105400307
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Medan. (2024). Statistik ketenagakerjaan Kota Medan 2023. BPS Kota Medan.
Dostie, B. (2018). The impact of training on innovation. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 71(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793917701116
Jalal Hanaysha. (2012). The role of practical training in productivity and profitability of organizations in the third millennium. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1970–1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.933
Khan, H. G. A., Khan, M. A., & Ahmed, S. (2024). Training and development, career development, and organizational commitment as predictors of work performance. Heliyon, 10(1), e23903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23903
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436661
Siddique, M., Procter, S., & Gittell, J. H. (2022). Human resource practices, employee competencies and firm performance: A 2-1-2 multilevel mediational analysis. Personnel Review, 51(3), 1100–1119. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-08-2020-0609
Tharenou, P., Saks, A. M., & Moore, C. (2007). A review and critique of research on training and organizational-level outcomes. Human Resource Management Review, 17(3), 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.07.004
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Manda Dwipayani Bhastari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
