CSR AND BRANDING BASED ON ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVE: HABERMAS' CRITICAL THEORY

Sri Wahyuni; Lilik Purwanti

doi:10.54443/ijebas.v3i3.871

CSR AND BRANDING BASED ON ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVE: HABERMAS' CRITICAL THEORY

Sri Wahyuni

Lilik Purwanti

The purpose of this research is to explore the concept of CSR branding from the perspective of Islam and through the communication theory of Habermas. CSR is understood as a form of corporate responsibility that involves social concern for the environment in order to strengthen its positive image in society. However, some companies distort the concept of CSR towards branding, which is considered by the majority of society as a manipulative act. In Habermas' communication theory, CSR is one form of communicating the social and environmental effects of a company's economic actions on certain groups in society as a whole. And from an Islamic perspective, CSR branding can be communicated effectively and is permissible as long as it does not violate Sharia principles such as honesty, transparency, and avoiding things that contradict Islamic values

Keywords: CSR Branding Habermas Critical Theory Islamic Perspective

Rudito, B dan Famiola, M. 2013. Corporate Social Responsibility. Cetakan Pertama, Bandung: Rekayasa.

Kapferer, J. N., 2004, “The new strategic brand management Creating and sustaining brand equity long term” (2nd ed)., London and Sterling, VA: Kogan Page.

Keller, K.L., 2008, “Strategic brand management Building, measuring, and managing brand equity” (3rd. ed.). upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice HallAmerican Marketing Association

Luo, X., Bhattacharya, C. B., 2006, “Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value” Journal of Marketing, 70 (4), 1-18

Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., Korschun, D., 2006., “The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2), 158-166

Prior et al. 2008. Are Socially Responsible Managers Really Ethical? Exploring the Relationship Between Earnings Managemen and Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International review, 16(3):160-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00678.x

Darmawati. 2014. Corporate Social Responsibility dalam Perspektif Islam. Mazhab, XII(2): 125-137. (Satrio, 2015)

Berita Satu. 2016, UU CSR Rusak Iklim Investasi (Online), (http://www.beritasatu.com/industriperdagangan/384183-uu-csr-rusak-iklim-investasi.html. Diakses pada 28 April 2023.

Ministry of Environment and Forestry. 2023. Penetapan Peserta Proper 2022-2023. https://proper.menlhk.go.id/proper/berita/detail/368. Diakses pada 07 April 2023.

Swara, Vandy Yoga dan Simatupang, Erwinton. 2020. Keluar Dari Lingkaran CSR: Corporate Enterpreneurship Dalam Menjawab Tantangan Sosial License to Operate. Jurnal Sinergitas PkM & CSR, 4(2): 201-214.

Gunawan, Juniatí. 2015. Corporate Social Disclosures in Indonesia: Stakeholders’ Influence and Motivation, Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 535-552.

Gunawan, Juniatí. 2010. Perception of Important Information in Corporate Social Disclosures:

Evidence from Indonesia, Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 62-71.

Damanik, Janianton. 2011, Menuju Pelayanan Sosial yang Berkeadilan, Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1-14.

Mulyadi. 2016. Sistem Akuntansi Edisi empat. Salemba Empat: Jakarta.

Sari Fitri Indah, Mediaty, dan Said Darwis. 2020. Corporate Social Responsibility VS Creating Shared Value Melalui Kajian Perspektif Islam: Pendekatan Kritis Jurgen Habermas. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Peradaban, 6(1):1-16.

Chambers, Eleanor et.al. 2003. CSR in Asia : A Seven Countries Study of CSR Website Reporting. Nottingham: International Center for Corporate Social Responsibility – Nottingham University

Setiawan Reza Nugraha. 2017. Personal Branding vs Pencitraan. https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2017/02/13/17552151/.personal.branding.vs.pencitraan?page=all. Diakses pada 07 April 2023

Jalal. 2016. Yang Dilarang dan Dianjurkan untuk Pemerintah dalam Mempromosikan CSR Arus Utama. https://socialinvestment.id/artikel/yang-dilarang-dan-dianjurkan-untuk-pemerintah-dalam-mempromosikan-csr-arus-utama/. Diakses pada 07 April 2023.

Budiarto, Nurhana Septerina. 2022. Kajian Mitos Sustainability Dalam Iklan Corporate Social Responsibility Perusahaan Unilever.

cnnindonesia.com. 2022. Polri: Penyelewengan Dana CSR Boeing oleh ACT Capai Rp.107,3M. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20220808144604-12-831767/polri-penyelewengan-dana-csr-boeing-oleh-act-capai-rp1073-m

Anggraeni Ary Yunita, Sukoharsono Eko Ganis, Achsin M. 2019. Mitos di Balik Laporan Sosial Bank Syariah.

brindonews.com. 2018. PT Harita Dinilai Gagal Salurkan CSR. https://www.brindonews.com/pt-harita-dinilai-gagal-salurkan-csr/. Diakses pada 07 April 2023.

Elasrag, H. 2015. Corporate Social Responsibility: An Islamic Pespective

Samsiyah., Y. Sambharakhresna, dan N. Kompyurini. 2013. Kajian Implementasi Corporate Social Responsibility Perbankan Syariah Ditinjau Dari Shariah Enterprise Theory Pada PT Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah Bhakti Sumekar Cabang Pamekasan. Jurnal InFestasi, 9(1):47-60.

Kalbarini, Rahmah Yulisa Dan Noven Suprayogi. 2014. Implementasi Akuntabilitas Dalam Konsep Metafora Amanah Di Lembaga Bisnis Syariah (Studi Kasus: Swalayan Pamella Yogyakarta). JESTT, 1(7):506-517.