IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUKATENDEL VILLAGE REGULATION POLICY NO. 01 OF 2019 CONCERNING THE DISASTER RESILIENT VILLAGE PROGRAM

Indonesia is an archipelagic country that is vulnerable to natural and non-natural disasters. The trend of natural disasters that occur in Indonesia itself tends to increase from year to year as well as what happened in Karo Regency. According to BPS data from 2015-2020 there was an increase in natural disasters, especially those caused by the eruption of Mount Sinabung.The problem that occurs is that Sukatendel Village is located in Tiganderket District, Karo Regency which has an altitude of 500 meters above sea level. This certainly increases the risk of disaster. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of implementing the Sukatendel Village Regulation No. 01 of 2019 regarding the Disaster Resilient Village program. With qualitative research methods. The results showed thatImplementation of Village Regulation No. 1 of 2018 concerning the disaster-resilient village program which includes 4 (four) factors, namely: The communication factor has not been carried out properly, due to the irregularity of socialization activities and the limitations of information communication tools to the surrounding community. The human resource factor is adequate in the implementation of DESTANA with the establishment of a village management and DRR Forum, but has limited budget and facilities in disaster management. The disposition factor or commitment owned by the implementor is good in carrying out its responsibilities as the implementer of the policy. The bureaucratic structure factor in the implementation of DESTANA has been directed and clear with the creation of a disaster management mechanism, the division and role of each team, but this is of course with the approval of the Karo Regency Government.

Referring to the natural disaster phenomenon in Karo Regency, the Karo Regency Regional Government as an extension of the Central Government has made a disaster management policy strategy by appointing the Karo Regency Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD) as the responsible implementer.Based on this appointment, the Karo District BPBD established the Disaster Resilient Village program based on the Regulation of the Head of BNPB No. 1 of 2012.According to the Regulation of the Head of BNPB No. 1 of 2012 Disaster Resilient Village is a village that has the independent ability to adapt and face the threat of disasters, as well as recover.immediately from the adverse effects of disasters.
In its implementation, the Karo Regency Government has formed several villages in the Disaster Resilient Village Program (DESTANA), where the community is the main actor who directly responds to disasters and needs to be equipped with tough knowledge in dealing with situations, one of the disaster resilient villages in Karo Regency is Sukatendel Village which is outlined in the policy Village Regulation No. 1 of 2019.
ProblemThe area faced by Sukatendel Village, which is recorded in Tiganderket District, Karo Regency, is located at an altitude of 500 meters above sea level which is very close to Mount Sinabung and is traversed by the Bekerah River, part of which is at the foot of Mount Sinabung.This certainly increases the risk of cold lava floods when Mount Sinabung erupts.During the last 5 years Sukatendel Village has often been hit by lava floods due to the diligent spewing of Mount Sinabung lava.As a result, the people of Sukatendel experienced an economic decline due to constraints in economic activities when Mount Sinabung erupted.

METHOD
In this study, the method used is a qualitative descriptive method.This qualitative method, the author is the instrument in the research and the analysis is carried out continuously from the beginning of the study to data analysis.The research method uses a qualitative approach, qualitative methodsis research that requires a deep and thorough understanding and is related to the object to be studied and is able to answer problems with data, then analyzed and can draw conclusions under certain conditions.Not only that, the qualitative research method also aims to describe the research as a whole by using data in the form of written or verbal words sourced from research informants and supported by analyzing events, attitudes and thoughts of the individuals and groups involved.

DISCUSSION AND RESULTS
The word Sukatendel comes from the history of the arrival of a surnamed Ginting Suka who came from the village of Perbesi who intended to open a field (Barung-Barung) and felt at home (tondel) so it was called Sukatende with the opening of a field (Barung-Barung) by Ginting liked to make the natives who live around recently, the winds of the short house living in the fields of Kuta male, the winds of the middle house And the winds of the mbelin house living in Kuta gugung.build a Karo traditional house.One for Ginting likes and Warinangin, 1 traditional house for the beru kuta child.
Furthermore, after the descendants of Warinangin developed and were considered the first opening of the village and the Ginting clan liked to be referred to as kalimbubu simanjek lulang, Sitepu as the son of old Beru, warin-wind, the house of the brackets manik, and the warin-wind of the middle house, Tarigan and ginting of the children of the old Beru, Warinangin, the mbelin house, Tarigan and the old Beru's son chimed in the stifling house.
During the Dutch colonial era (1935) 30 traditional Karo houses had been built but they had to be burned down because the entire Sukatendel community had to flee to the Marwall and Laubaleng areas.After the entire community returned from the evacuation (1936), a runggu was held to appoint the penghulu.
Of the 259 villages in Karo Regency, of course, not all of them received the DESTANA program, this program was given to several villages that were considered prone to natural disasters, one of which was Sukatendel Village which was under the foot of Mount Sinabung.Referring to these problems, the researchers used the theory of policy implementation according to George C.
Edward III to answer research problems with 4 (four) indicators as follows:

3.1.Communication Factor
Communication is the first indicator in reviewing the implementation of policy implementation.Communication in a policy has several important points, namely starting from transformation, information, information clarity and information consistency.In this case the author obtained initial information from the Karo Regency BPBD, namely Mrs. Roma as the Head of Preparedness and Prevention, she said that: "In accordance with the policy made by the Karo Regency Government in Disaster Management in the form of a disaster-resilient village program, where this program only selects 9 (nine) villages in Karo Regency in 2021, one of which is Sukatendel Village.One form of information provided to each village or representative through socialization activities that have been made, in 2021 each village is required to bring 50 participants, currently we as BPBD can only conduct direct socialization to village officials to provide an understanding of resilience in dealing with disasters, because it is not easy to empower people to know how to deal with disasters that can come at any time, and this requires resilience and awareness from all parties involved" The same thing was conveyed by the Head of Sukatendel Village, namely Mr. Dewanto Warin-Angin who said that: "The communication that has been carried out for the last 2 (two) years is in the form of socialization to all Sukatendel Village communities and only 1 (one) socialization, in this activity the Village government is assisted by BPBD Karo Regency, this socialization program conveys the importance of mitigation and the independence of the Village through its community in dealing with disasters that can come at any time" Added by the Head of Sukatendel Disaster Resilient Village, Mr. Hengki Tarigan, he said that: "Not only direct socialization carried out by the local government, but communication and other information is also carried out in the form of distributing billboards or early warnings related to threat information, starting from warning actions that read the level of alert, alert and alert in Sukatendel Village".To facilitate the dissemination of information to the entire community, the Sukatendel Village Government takes other ways to anticipate the threat of an upcoming disaster, by preparing one of the steps for disseminating early warning information as follows: Different things were expressed by the people of Sukatendel Village, namely Mrs. Elisabeth that: "It is true that there was socialization carried out by the Village Government and BPBD of Karo Regency, but this was only carried out in 1 (one) meeting for a period of 2 (two) years, of course this activity was not effective and optimal in tackling natural disasters.Besides that, I don't think people need education in the form of theory, because not all people understand it."The same thing was also expressed by the Sukatendel community, namely Mrs. Leny Sianipar that: "In the disaster socialization activities that have been made by the local government, there are no benefits to the community.In my opinion, the socialization activities are just talk without any clear practice, the people of Sukatendel need examples or special forms of training in dealing with disasters, not just talk".Based on the results of interviews and observations made by the author in Sukatendel Village, it can be seen that the implementation of information communication about disaster management is considered less than optimal, causing public dissatisfaction in managing potential disasters in their area.Therefore, there are several things that must be improved by the Sukatendel Village Government so that the provision of information is better and has benefits for the community:

3.2.Resource Factor
Resources relate to preparedness in supporting the implementation of the policies that have been made.Resources have several dimensions, namely, human resources, facilities and budget.
From the human resource factor, information was obtained from the Head of Sukatendel Village, Mr. Dewanto Warin-angin, namely: "The Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD) and the Sukatendel Village Government have formed a team and management of DESTANA.The presence of human resources through the DESTANA team assists the village government in taking steps and policies in emergencies and distributing logistics for disaster victims.The formation of the DESTANA team has sufficient number of human resources in tackling disasters and is able to coordinate the situation in Sukatendel village" Based on the results of the survey and data obtained by the researcher, that human resources in Sukatendel Village are not only focused on the Village Government and the DESTANA team, but also involve and form a village disaster risk reduction forum (DRR Forum) as stipulated in the Sukatendel Village Regulation article 15 as follows : Members of the Village disaster risk reduction forum as referred to in paragraph ( 1  Based on the results of interviews obtained by researchers with the Sukatendel community, namely Mrs. Lenny Sianipar that: "Resources in the form of facilities in disaster management are still very limited, such as inadequate refugee posts, loudspeakers and other necessities which are still relatively minimal with a dense population."This is supported by the results of observations made by researchers, that the limited facilities in supporting the implementation of the disaster resilient village program in Sukatendel village are slow due to equipment, communication and information in disaster mitigation.From the results of the information obtained above, it can be concluded that the village government apparatus and the DESTANA team as implementers or implementers of the policy have not been able to meet the requirements in terms of disaster prevention facilities in SukatendeL village.

Bureaucratic Structure Factor
Bureaucratic structure is the 4th (fourth) factor in policy implementation which has a major influence in program implementation.There are main factors that become benchmarks in implementing it, namely; mechanism and division of work in carrying out disaster-resilient village programs.A complicated bureaucratic structure will complicate the implementation process.The very important bureaucratic structure of a government organization is the existence of an appropriate and clear mechanism and division of labor as a reference for implementing actions.In addition to being supported by the commitment of policy implementers to implement a program, the implementor of Sukatendel Village has also made a mechanism or SOP as well as ways that need to be prepared with steps: mitigation, preparedness to recovery.SOPs, division of labor and actors involved aim to help build community resilience when dealing with disasters, both before and after the incident.The pictures or strategies for disaster management are as follows: (Figure 1 ) consist of the following elements: a. Village Administration b.Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) c.Religious social institutions d.Social organization e. Public and Private Schools f.Public g.The business world in the village h.Youth organization i. PKK groups and Posyandu j.Village Cooperative k.Volunteer group l.Family planning groups, PPKBD, Sub PPKBD and according to needs Furthermore, the dimension of human resources is one of the important indicators in implementing a policy.Sukatendel Village also needs facilities to support the implementation of the Disaster Resilient Village program, while the facilities owned by Sukatendel Village are as follows:

Table 4 : Prevention and Mitigation
. Disaster Management Mechanism) Time Allocation and Role of Disaster Management Actors