PATTERNS OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN CHILDREN AND PARENTS (CASE STUDY OF BROKEN HOME FAMILIES IN PENGGALANGAN VILLAGE COMMUNITY, TEBING SYAHBANDAR DISTRICT)
Main Article Content
Siti Purnama Sari
Indication representation is the transaction of communication delivery nailed into a single credible insigne that contains meaning, from missing stimuli to ever -changing individual behaviors. Included in the poor families for this generalization, the researcher wants to introduce the Pattern of Interpersonal Communication between Children and Parents (Case Study of Broken Home Family in Penggalangan Village Community of Tebing Syahbandar District). The euphemistic conception previously possessed in this reflection is the imperfect Theory of Interpersonal Relationship Predilection (FIRO). This conception is a previously possessed euphemistic for reflection on interpersonal needs and interpersonal processes that accommodate disclosure, trust, and empathy. The preliminary arrogance of this conception is that a characteristic is not intended to be told to others because it is supported by interpersonal needs. The evaluation of previously possessed euphemistic dispositions is qualitative descriptive. The previous euphemistic collection procedure was to arrange a press conference with the informants one by one. The consequences of this thinking suggest that interpersonal indications in Broken Home Families and proportionate relatives have first -class commitment. Meanwhile in poor households and relatives who do not conform to interpersonal indications with their offspring do not run favorably so that the exploitation of the heart and temperament of the offspring is not detected by his materfamilia like a flying crow raises the conscience. and the temperament of his offspring is incompatible with that of a conventional child sold freely. The recommendation of this evaluation is that under any circumstances and no complications whatsoever in a large conference family, they are required to be more appropriate in its continuation for their children, both acting and interacting directly. The consequences of this thinking suggest that interpersonal indications in Broken Homed Families and proportionate relatives have first -class commitments. Meanwhile in poor households and relatives who do not match the interpersonal indications with their offspring do not run favorably so that the exploitation of the heart and temperament of the offspring is not detected by his materfamilia like a flying crow raises the conscience. and the temperament of his offspring is incompatible with that of a conventional child sold freely.
Abla Basat Gomma, Mahrat fi at-Tarbiyah li an Nafsiyah li-Fardin Mutauzin wa Usrah Mutamsikah, Translated by Mohd. Zaki Abdillah, Educating Children Mental: An American Man For The Family Tames His Child's Extraordinary Intelligence, Waringinrejo, Cemani, Sukoharjo, 2006,
Arfina, Litha dress, 2014, “Chain Reactions from Broken Family Homedi home in children”
Andriana, 20515 "Chain Reactions to Housing Poverty in Children"
Anna, Lusia Kus, 2020, “Divorce Container Increases, 70 Percent Sent by Wives”
Bailon, SG & Maglaya, A. kth and kin wellness Care: Cognitive semantics getting closer (Translation).
Fadlimuhammad, 2009 "Impact of Damaged Houses"
Friedman, 1998. Family Nursing. Jakarta: EGC.
Nurmalasari, Y, 2008, "Broken Home: Impact and Solutions"
Vendi promises "Understanding a Broken Home"
Zakiah, Sarah Siti, 20011, Thesis: Communication of Broken Home Adolescents, Phenomenology of Broken Home Adolescent Community with Bandung Parents ..
¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬Books
Altman, I & Taylor, DA 1973. Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston,
Bungin, Burhan. 2009. Quantitative Research Methods: Economic Communication, and Public Policy and Other Social Sciences. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Cangara, Hafied. 2015. Introduction to Communication Science. Second Edition, 15th Edition. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Djamarah, SB 2004. COMMUNICATION Between Humans. South Tangerang: Karisma Publishing Group.
Effendy, OU 2003. Communication Science “Theory and Practice”. Bandung: PT. Rosdakarya Youth.
Hardiyansyah. 2015. Concepts and Applications of Public Service Communication. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Joseph A. Devito. 1997. Inter -Human Communication. Bandung: PT. Rosda Karya.
Koentjaraningrat. 1986. Methods - Community Research Methods. Jakarta: Gramedia Adimiharja.
Miles, Matthew B and Huberman, Michael A. 1992. Qualitative Data Analysis. Jakarta: University of Indonesia Press.
Moleong, Lexi J. 2000. Qualitative Research Methods. Bandung: PT. Rosda Karya Pemuda.
Mulyana, Dedy. 2005. Communication Science: An Introduction. Bandung: Rekam Remaja Remaja Ca Media.
Mulyana, Dedy. 2007. Communication Science: An Introduction. Bandung: PT Pemuda Rosda Karya.
Rahmat, Jalaluddin. 2004. Communication Research Methods. Bandung: Pemuda Rosda Karya.
Santoso, Edi and Setiasah Mite. 2010. Communication Theory, first edition. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Scheidel, Thomas M. 1976. Speech Communication and Human Interaction, Scoot, Foresman & Co. Glenwille.
Wiryanto. 2004. Introduction to Communication Science. Jakarta: PT. grammar
jonathan Crowther, Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English, Oxford UniversityPress, Walton Street, 1995
Website
http://lithasari.blogspot.co.id/2014/11/elektron-family-broken-home- melawan.html
http://ddistrictofnaya.blogspot.co.id/2010/11/brokenhome-impact-dan- solution.html
http://dir.unikom.ac.id/s1-final-project/fakultas-sospol/science communications/2011/jbptunikommpp-gdl-sarahsitiz-24552/1-unikom-st.pdf/1-unikom-st .pdf
http://sobatbaru.blogspot.com/2008/04/pengertian-broken-home.html
