THE INFLUENCE OF LEADERSHIP STYLE, WORK ETHIC, ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND JOB SATISFACTION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF EMPLOYEES PT. LAMAN MINING
Main Article Content
The purpose of this research is to find out the influence of Leadership Style, Work Ethic, Organizational Culture and Job Satisfaction on Employee Performance of PT. Laman Mining. The subject of this study was an employee of PT. Laman mining of the sample to be taken is determined by the Slovin formula. The number of Employees of Laman Mining is 50 people. By using slovin formula with a margin of error of 5% obtained results with a presentation rate of 95%. The data was obtained by questionnaire system using likert scale. The results of this study show that leadership style, work ethic, organizational culture and job satisfaction have a positive effect on the performance of employees PT. Laman Mining. (4) The direct influence of Leadership Style (X1) on Employee Performance (Y) has a parameter coefficient of -0.165 (negative), so there is a negative influence where the more Authoritarian The Leadership Style (X1) the lower the Employee Performance (Y) and the Value P Award (X1)) on Employee Performance (Y) is -0.196> 0.05 so that it can be said that the influence of Awards on Employee Performance is insignificant. (4) The magnitude of the influence of Leadership Style (X1), Work Ethic (X2), Organizational Culture (X3) and Job Satisfaction (X4) on Employee Performance (Y) is determined by r² value, r² value on job satisfaction (Y) is 0.984 which means the influence of Leadership Style (X1)), Work Ethic (X2), Organizational Culture (X3) and Job Satisfaction (X4) on Employee Performance (Y) is 98.4%. then there is a negative influence where the more Authoritarian Leadership Style (X1) the lower the Employee Performance (Y) and P value Reward (X1) on Employee Performance (Y) is -0.196 > 0.05 so that it can be stated that the influence of Awards on Employee Performance is insignificant (4) The magnitude of the influence of Leadership Style (X1), Work Ethic (X2, Organizational Culture (X3) and Job Satisfaction (X4) on Employee Performance (Y) is determined by r² value, r² value to job satisfaction (Y) is 0.984 which means the influence of Work Motivation (X1)), Work Ethic (X2), Organizational Culture (X3)and Job Satisfaction (X4) on Employee Performance (Y) is 98.4%.
Afianto, I. D., & Hamidah, N. (2017). Pengaruh Kerja Kerja Dan Komunikasi Organisasi Tentang Kerja Dan Kinerja Karyawan (Studi pada Karyawan Divisi Marketing PT. Victory International Futures Kota Malang). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 50(6), 58-67
Anggarini, L. N. (2018). Analysis of Y Factors That Affect the Performance of Employees Bulog Head Office Bulog. EXECUTIVE Journal, 15(1), 260-280
Alfaidah, Fitria. 2007. Effect of Employee Job Satisfaction on Work Productivity in Jabung Malang Agro-Commerce Cooperative. Malang: Faculty of Economics UIN Malang
Aidinil Zetra. Leadership Style (Political Leadership Lecture Reading Material). Padang : Master of Political Science Andalas University
Hani, Handoko T. 2010. Personnel and Human Resources Management Second Edition. Yogyakarta: BPFE
Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. 2006. Evaluation of Human Resources Performance.Jakarta: Refika Aditama
Noermayanti Hidayat. 2010.Modeling Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Based Variance On Health Degrees In East Java Province
Robbins, Stephen P. 1996. Organizational Behavior 7th Edition (Volume II). Jakarta : Prehallindo
Sekar Putri Purnomo. Polulation and Sample Research Methods
Sugiyono, 2011. Qualitative Quantifiative Research Method and R&B, Bandung: Alphabet
Rogers, Everett M. (2003). Diffusion Of Innovation. 5th Edition. Free Press, New York. [8] Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian manajemen. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tegor, Dkk. (2020). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Deepublish.
Warrick, D. D. (2011). The Urgent Need for Skilled Transformational Leaders: Integrating Transformational Leadership and Organization Development. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics. Vol. 8 No. 5.