THE INFLUENCE OF CAPITAL ADEQUACY RATIO, NET INTEREST MARGIN AND OPERATIONAL COSTS OF OPERATING REVENUE ON RETURN ON ASSET WITH LOAN TODEPOSIT RATIO AS INTERVENING VARIABLE
Main Article Content
Research Problems: To further increase the existence of conventional banks and the trust of the Indonesian people in conventional banking services, it is necessary to improve the performance of conventional banking. The problems in this study are whether CAR, NIM, BOPO and LDR have a significant effect on ROA; Do CAR, NIM, and BOPO have a significant effect on LDR; and whether CAR, NIM and BOPO have a significant effect on ROA through LDR as an intervening variable. Research purposes: To find out how much influence CAR, NIM, BOPO and LDR have on ROA; to find out how much influence CAR, NIM, and BOPO have on LDR; and to find out how much influence CAR, NIM and BOPO have on ROA through LDR as an intervening variable. Research methods: This type of research is quantitative research with a descriptive approach. The object of this research is a commercial bank listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2015-2019 period. The sample in this study was 10 conventional commercial banks, which were selected based on the purposive sampling method. Data analysis technique using multiple linear regression analysis. Research Findings: Partially there is no significant effect of the CAR variable on the LDR, there is a significant negative effect of the NIM variable on the LDR; and there is a significant positive effect of BOPO on LDR; there is an insignificant negative effect of the CAR variable on ROA, there is a significant positive effect of the NIM variable on ROA, there is no significant effect of the BOPO and LDR variables on ROA. Simultaneously CAR, NIM, BOPO have a positive and significant effect on LDR and CAR, NIM, BOPO and LDR have a positive and significant effect on ROA. LDR is the intervening variable of CAR on ROA, because the number of direct effects of CAR on ROA is smaller, but LDR is not an intervening variable of NIM and BOPO on ROA because the number of direct effects of NIM and BOPO on ROA is greater than the indirect effect.
Agustina, & Wijaya, A. (2013). Analisis Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Loan Deposit Ratio Bank Swasta Nasional di Bank Indonesia. Jurnal Wira Ekonomi Mikroskil, 3(2), 101–109.
Ali, M., & Triyuliawan, R. R. L. (2017). Pengaruh Net Interest Margin (NIM), Biaya Operasional Terhadap Pendapatan Operasional (BOPO), Loan To Deposit Ratio (LDR) Dan Non Performing Loan (NPL) Terhadap Return on Assets (ROA). Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 5(2), 1377–1392. https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v5i2.7853
Amir, F. L., Parwati, K. S. M., & Darsana, I. M. (2022). Post-Covid-19 Nusa Penida Tourism Recovery as a Sustainable Spiritual Tourism Area. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(2).
Arseto, D. D., & Jufrizen, J. (2018). Pengaruh Return On Asset dan Current Ratio Terhadap Dividen Payout Ratio Dengan Firm Size Sebagai Variabel Moderating. Maneggio: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Manajemen, 1(1), 15–30.
Dw, T. D.-W., Reproduksi, C., & Membaca, C. (n.d.). Tabel Durbin- Watson (DW), α = 5%. 1– 13.
Edwar Yokeu Bernardin, D. (2016). Pengaruh CAR dan LDR terhadap Return on Assets.
Ecodemica, IV(2), 232–241.
Efriyenty, D. (2020). Pengaruh Capital Adequacy Ratio Dan Non Performing Loan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bei. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, Vol . 20,(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.30596/jrab.v20i2.5309
Fitria, L. N., & Widiati, P. K. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Rasio Keuangan dan Dana Pihak Ketiga Terhadap Profitabilitas Melalui Financing To Deposit Ratio Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada Perbankan Syariah. Seminar Nasional Dan Call for Paper: Manajemen, Akuntansi Dan Perbankkan 2018, 679–689.
Gultom, D. K., Manurung, M., & Sipahutar, R. P. (2020). Pengaruh Current Ratio, Debt To Equity Ratio, Total Asset Turnover terhadap Return on Assets pada Perusahaan Sub Sektor Kosmetik dan Barang Keperluan Rumah Tangga yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Humaniora, 4(1), 1–14.
Hafiz, M. S., Radiman, R., Sari, M., & Jufrizen, J. (2019). Analisis Faktor Determinan Return on Asset pada Bank BUMN yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Keuangan, 8(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.33059/jmk.v8i2.1681
Jufrizen, J., & Nasution, M. F. (2016). Pengaruh Return On Asset, Total Asset Turnover, Quick Ratio, Dan Inventory Turnover Terhadap Debt To Asset Ratio Pada Perusahaan Jasa Sub Sektor Perdagangan Besar Barang Produksi Yang Terdapat Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 16(1), 45–70.
Nurvarida, N. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh BOPO, CAR, NPF, FDR Dan NOM Terhadap Profitabilitas Bank Umum Syariah Periode 2012-2016. Jurnal Institut Agama Islam Negeri Salatiga, 1–138.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2014). Booklet OJK 2014. Booklet Perbankan Indonesia 2014, 7.
Pardede, D. N., & Pangestuti, I. R. D. (2016). Analisis Pengaruh CAR, Dana Pihak Ketiga (DPK), NIM, Dan LDR Terhadap Profitabilitas Perbankan Dengan LDR Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Diponegoro Journal of Management, 5(3), 1–13.
Pinasti, W. F. (2017). Pengaruh Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Biaya Operasional Pada Pendapatan Operasional (BOPO), Non Performing Loan (NPL), Net Interest Margin (NIM) dan Loan To Deposit Ratio (LDR) terhadap Profitabilitas Bank (Studi Pada Bank Umum Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Ef (Vol. 4). Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Putri, L. P. (2015). Pengaruh Profitabilitas terhadap Harga Saham pada Perusahaan Pertambahan Batubara di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 16(02), 2015.
Raharjo, S. (2014). Cara Uji Analisis Jalur [Path Analysis] dengan SPSS Lengkap. SPSS Indonesia: Olah Data Statistik Dengan SPSS, pp. 1–42.
Sekarwati, A. (2018). Pengaruh CAR, DPK, BOPO, dan NPF Terhadap Profitabilitas dengan FDR Sebagai Variabel Intervening pada Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia Tahun 2013-2017. Institut Agama Islam Negeri Salatiga.
Sethadharma, A. (2010). Uji Asumsi Klasik dengan SPSS 16.0.
Sudarmawanti, E., & Pramono, J. (2017). Pengaruh CAR, NPL, BOPO, NIM dan LDR Terhadap ROA (Studi Kasus Pada Bank Perkreditan Rakyat di Salatiga yang terdaftar di Otoritas Jasa Keuangan tahun 2011 - 2015). Among Makarti, 10(19), 1–18.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D (ke-19). Bandung: Alfabeta Bandung.
Sumartik, & Hariasih, M. (2018). Buku Ajar Manajemen Perbankan (Cetakan Pe). Umsida Press. Surya Sanjaya, & Rizky, M. F. (2018). Analisis Profitabilitas Dalam Menilai Kinerja Keuangan Pada PT. Taspen (Persero) Medan. Jurnal KITABAH, 2(2), 277–293.
Susanti, P. H. U., & Darsana, I. Impact of Human Resources Innovation on the Evolution of the Tourism Sector in Bali Indonesia Post-Covid-19 Pandemic.
Suryono, B. (2016). Analisis Rasio Keuangan Dan Aplikasinya Terhadap Profitabilitas Perusahaan. Jurnal Ekuitas (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 2(2), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y1998.v2.i2.1862
Triyanto, J., P, J., Samad, G., & et.al. (2017). Pengaruh Loan To Deposit Ratio (Ldr), Capital Adequacy Ratio (Car), Net Interest Margin (Nim), Net Performing Laon (Npl) Terhadap Return On Asset (Roa) ( Studi Kasus Pada Bank Umum Go Public Di Bei Tahun 2011-2015). Jurnal Sains Dan Seni ITS, 6(1), 51–66.
Umi, Hamidah, S. N. R., & Mardiyati. (2016). Pengaruh modal intelektual, ldr, bopo, dan npl terhadap kinerja perusahaan pada sektor perbankan yang terdaftar di bei periode 2010 – 2014. Jurnal Ekonomi, 1–18.
Wahyuni, S. F. (2016). Pengaruh Loan To Deposit Ratio (Ldr), Capital Adequacy Ratio (Car)