THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PRAGMATIC AND IDEOLOGICAL LEADERSHIP IN ORGANIZATION: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
Main Article Content
Danny Philipe Bukidz
Genesis Sembiring Depari
Elisabeth Marlina Sari Lintong
Introduction/Main Objectives: This study aims to analyze and compare existing literature on pragmatic and idealistic leadership, specifically examining the differences between these leadership styles within organizations. The goal is to develop a more comprehensive understanding of these two approaches and how they contrast with one another. Background Problems: The research may face background challenges due to inadequate understanding of the differences between pragmatic and idealistic leadership, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each style. Moreover, it may be necessary to investigate the perceptions of various stakeholders such as followers, peers, and superiors towards these leadership styles. Novelty: Prior research has predominantly examined these leadership styles in isolation ; however, this study seeks to present a more comprehensive analysis by exploring both their distinctions and commonalities. Research Methods: A Systematic Literature Review is expected to include an analysis of existing studies sourced from five reputable journals indexed in the scopus database. Finding/Results: Pragmatic leadership is flexible and adaptable, emphasizing context-dependent approaches that prioritize relationships within a community. Ideological leadership, on the other hand, involves leaders who have a strong belief in a particular ideology or set of values that guide their decision-making and actions. Conclusion: the articles suggest that modern leaders need to be both pragmatic and idealistic to succeed. They should have a strong belief in their vision or set of values while also being flexible and adaptable to the current situation.
REFERENCES
Albeha, M., Fernandes, S., Mesquita, D., Seabra, F., & Ferreira-Oliveira, A. (2020). Graduate Employability and Competence Development in Higher Education—A Systematic Literature Review Using PRISMA. Sustainability, 12(15), 1–27. https://www-scopus-com.unmsm.lookproxy.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85089738422&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&nlo=&nlr=&nls=&sid=45029e5b6145459ddd4bee918b9d0e30&sot=a&sdt=cl&cluster=scoexactsrctitle%2C%22Revesco+Revista+De+Estudios+Cooperativo
Anderson, M. H., & Sun, P. Y. T. (2017). Reviewing Leadership Styles: Overlaps and the Need for a New ‘Full-Range’ Theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12082
Avolio, B. J. (2007). Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. American Psychologist, 62(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.62.1.25
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership: A response to critiques.
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
Coopey, J. (1995). The learning organization, power, politics and ideology introduction. Management Learning, 26(2), 193–213.
Crayne, M. P. (2021). Making sense of crisis: Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leadership in response to COVID-19. American Psychologist, 76(3), 462–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000715
Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski, K. M., & Pearce, C. L. (2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.002
Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.001
Fry, L. W., Vitucci, S., & Cedillo, M. (2005). Spiritual leadership and army transformation: Theory, measurement, and establishing a baseline. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(5), 835–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.07.012
Greenleaf, R. K. (2008). Greenleaf on Servant-Leadership: Who Is the Servant-Leader? International Journal of Servant-Leadership, 4(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.33972/ijsl.234
Hunter, S. T. (2020). Extending the charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic approach to leadership: Multiple pathways to success. In Extending the Charismatic, Ideological, and Pragmatic Approach to Leadership: Multiple Pathways to Success. https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85108049425
Hunter, S. T., Bedell-Avers, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). Impact of situational framing and complexity on charismatic, ideological and pragmatic leaders: Investigation using a computer simulation. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.007
Judge, T. A. E. F. W. (2008). LEADERSHIP. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behavior: Volume One: Micro Approaches, 1, 334.
Kool, M., & van Dierendonck, D. (2012). Servant leadership and commitment to change, the mediating role of justice and optimism. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(3), 422–433. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811211228139
Ligon, G. S., Hunter, S. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2008). Development of outstanding leadership: A life narrative approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 312–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.005
Lovelace, J. (2019). Charismatic, ideological, & pragmatic (CIP) model of leadership: A critical review and agenda for future research. Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.08.001
Mumford, M. (2009). Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leadership: Where we are, and where do we need to go? In Research in Multi-Level Issues (Vol. 8, pp. 135–143). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1475-9144(2009)0000008007
Mumford, M. D. (2006a). Pathways to outstanding leadership: A comparative analysis of charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leaders. Psychology Press.
Mumford, M. D. (2006b). Pathways to Outstanding Leadership. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415963633
Mumford, M. D. (2008). Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leadership: Multi-level influences on emergence and performance. Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.002
Mumford, M. D., & Van Doorn, J. R. (2001). The leadership of pragmatism. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(3), 279–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(01)00080-7
Pasternack, B. A., & O Toole, J. (2002). Yellow-light leadership: How the world’s best companies manage uncertainty. Strategy and Business, 74–83.
Patapan, H. (2013). Modern philosopher kings: Lee Kuan yew and the limits of confucian “idealistic” leadership. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 12(2), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700615-13120204
Piccolo, R. F., Greenbaum, R., Hartog, D. N. den, & Folger, R. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2–3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.627
Ruwhiu, D., & Cone, M. (2013). Pragmatic leadership: A return to wisdom. Journal of Management and Organization, 19(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2013.2
Seltzer, J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational Leadership: Beyond Initiation and Consideration. Journal of Management, 16(4), 693–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600403
Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based Theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577–594. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.4.577
Sparrowe, R. T. (2005). Authentic leadership and the narrative self. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.004
Strange, J. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). The origins of vision. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 343–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00125-x
Suddaby, R. (2010). Construct clarity in theories of management and organization: Editor’s comments. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 346–357.
Thomas, T., Schermerhorn, J. R., & Dienhart, J. W. (2004). Strategic leadership of ethical behavior in business. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(2), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.13837425
van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. In Journal of Management (Vol. 37, Issue 4, pp. 1228–1261). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380462
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2007). Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure†. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112.
Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 285–305.
