INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS REGARDING LEGAL CERTAINTY OF BEAUTY CLINIC PRODUCT LOGO BRAND
Main Article Content
Muhammad Rifzal Alief Ramadhan
Azhar Rashed
Adiatama Wira Buana
This study aims to analyze the judge's considerations and legal consequences of the cancellation of registered trademarks and determine the party who has the right to be the actual holder of trademark rights to the issuance of intellectual property rights trademarks and product logos. Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications states that registered trademark owners can file a lawsuit against other parties who without the right to use the Trademark that has similarities in principle or all for similar goods and/or services by filing a lawsuit for compensation and/or termination of acts related to the use of the Trademark. With this article, it can benefit registered trademark owners to be able to file a lawsuit against parties who try to piggyback on their brands to make profits. The problem is that the use of trademarks that contain similarities is basically proven to violate the provisions of Article 21 paragraph 1 of Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, showing that trademark law enforcement in Indonesia has not been carried out effectively that the theory of legal effectiveness according to Soekanto which states that the effectiveness of law enforcement can be influenced by certain factors, including legal factors, law enforcement factors, community factors, and cultural factors. In conclusion, the Judge has an important role in deciding the Trademark dispute case because it is to interpret the law so that it is possible for the judge to find legal value and even create a legal rule as contained in case law. These reasons or arguments are intended as the judge's accountability rather than his decision to the community, so that therefore they have objective value.
Delia Pritaria Cantika, 2018, Cancellation of Trademark Rights that Have Been Used as Fiduciary Collateral, Jurnal Juridical, Vol.5 No 1.
Dianita Anjar Prasomya, Budi Santoso, 2002, Legal Review of Trademark Cancellation Related to the Principle of Bad Faith in the Trademark Registration System, Notarius, Vol.15 No. 2.
Khoirul Hidayah, 2020, Intellectual Property Law, Setara Press, Malang
Muh. Ali Masnun and Radhyca Nanda Pratama, “Analysis of Deletion of Registered Trademarks on the Initiative of the Minister Due to Conflict with Laws and Regulations”, IUS Journal of Law and Justice Studies 8, No. 3. 2020.
Mardianto, A. Legal Consequences of Cancellation of Trademark Registration on the Rights of Trademark Licensees According to Law No. 15 of 2001. Jurnal Dinamika, Vol. 1 (No. 3). 2016.
Rianda Dirkareshza, SH, MH, Intellectual Property Rights, Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama, 2022.
Roscoe Pound, 1972, Interpretations of Legal History, Havu, LR, Holland.
Satjipto Rahardjo, Other Sides of Law in Indonesia, Second ed., Jakarta: Kompas Books, 2006.
Soekanto, S. Factors Affecting Law Enforcement. Jakarta. Raja Grafindo Persada. 2013.
Tim Lindsey, Eddy Damian. et al., 2002, Intellectual Property Rights: An Introduction, PT Alumni, Bandung.
Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications
Yayuk Sugiarti, “Brand Protection for Trademark Rights Holders Reviewed from Law Number 15 of 2001 Concerning Trademarks,” Jendela Hukum 3, No. 1, 2016.
Yulianto, Euku Fahmi, and Dewi Ayu Hidayati, “Development of Marine Tourism Villages in Order to Improve the Welfare of Coastal Communities in Pekon Tejang, Sebesi Island, Rajabasa District, South Lampung Regency,” in Working and Innovating for a Nation Based on Sustainable Development, (Lampung: Institute for Research and Community Service, University of Lampung, 2018)
