THE CORPORATE ADVANTAGE OF LEVERAGING DETERMINANTS IN THE VOLUNTARY CARBON OFFSET IN INDONESIA'S NEW CAPITAL CITY
DOI:
10.54443/morfai.v5i2.2837Published:
2025-04-26Downloads
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze and explain the implementation of the carbon offset program contributing to sustained competitive advantage for Telkomsel. The type of research used is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The large number of people who are not yet aware of the importance of carbon offset is one of the major challenges, even though contributions to this initiative can provide a sustainable competitive advantage for the company, by improving its reputation, attracting environmentally conscious consumers, and meeting increasingly stringent regulatory demands. The carbon offset program can provide a sustainable competitive advantage for Telkomsel by improving the company's image, attracting customers and investors, and utilizing government incentives. The limitation of the study is that many people are not yet aware of this program.
Keywords:
Carbon Offset, sustained competitive advantage, TelkomselReferences
REFERENCES
Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. J. (1993), “Strategic assets and Organizational rent”, StrategicManagement Journal, 13, pp. 33-46
Al-Mamary, Y. H. S., & Alraja, M. M. (2022). Understanding entrepreneurship intention and behavior in the light of TPB model from the digital entrepreneurship perspective. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2), 100106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100106
Barney, J. B. (1986), “Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy”,Management Science, 32(10), pp. 1231-1242
Barney, J. B. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal ofManagement, 17(1), pp. 99-121
Bumpus, A. and Liverman, D. (2008), ‘Accumulation by Decarbonisation and the Governance of Carbon Offsets’, Economic Geography, 84 (2), pp. 127–56.
Bungin, Burhan. 2011. Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Kencana Predana Media Group.
Bose, D., Bhattacharya, R., Kaur, T., Pandya, R., Sarkar, A., Ray, A., Mondal, S., Mondal, A., Ghosh, P., & Chemudupati, R. I. (2024). Innovative approaches for carbon capture and storage as crucial measures for emission reduction within industrial sectors. Carbon Capture Science and Technology, 12(April), 100238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2024.100238
Collis, D. J. and Montgomery, C. A. (1995), “Competing on resources: Strategy in the1990s”, Harvard Business Review, July-August, pp. 118-128
Conner, M. (2020). Theory of Planned Behavior. Handbook of Sport Psychology, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119568124.ch1
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Dicksen, P. R. (1996), “The static and dynamic mechanics of competitive theory”, Journal ofMarketing, 60 (October), pp. 102-106
Dirisu, I., Joy, Iyiola, O., & Ibidunni, S. O. (2013). Product differentiation: A tool of competitive advantage and optimal organizational performance (a study of unilever Nigeria plc). European Scientific Journal, 9(34).
Dubey, S. (2024). Navigating Corporate Social Responsibility: Bridging Voluntary Initiatives and Legal Accountability. Available at SSRN 4784282.
Fabiana Peixoto de, M., & Rosario, M. (2024). Assessing the efficacy of EU greenwashing directive: A study of European airlines’ voluntary carbon offset programs. Journal of the Air Transport Research Society, 3(May), 100028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jatrs.2024.100028
Gilang, R. (2023). Partisipasi Masyarakat Lokal Dalam Pengelolaan Ekowisata Hutan Mangrove Petengoran Di Desa Gebang Kabupaten Pesawaran.
Grant, R. M. (1991), “The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications forstrategy formulation”, California Management Review, Spring, pp. 114-135
Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. (1996), Competing for the Future, Harvard Business School Press,Paperback edition, Boston (Massachusetts).
Haque-Fawzi, M. G., Iskandar, A. S., Erlangga, H., & Sunarsi, D. (2022). Strategi Pemasaran Konsep, Teori Dan Implementasi. Pascal Books.
BAPPENAS. (2018) Diskusi NDC dalam Upaya Mengurangi Emisi Nasional. https://greengrowth.bappenas.go.id/diskusi-ndc-dalam-upaya-mengurangi-emisi-nasional/
Kompas. (2024) Pemerintah Tekan 127.67 Juta Ton Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca Sepanjang 2023. https://lestari.kompas.com/read/2024/01/17/070000986/pemerintah-tekan-127.67-juta-ton-emisi-gas-rumah-kaca-sepanjang-2023.
Kaltim Today. (2024). Kaltim Jadi Provinsi Pertama Penerima Kompensasi Karbon dari Bank Dunia. https://batuah-kukar.desa.id/artikel/2024/5/24/kaltim-jadi-provinsi-pertama-penerima-kompensasi-karbon-dari-bank-dunia
Kammeyer-Mueller et al Yuan, C., Xue, D., & He, X. (2021). A balancing strategy for ambidextrous learning, dynamic capabilities, and business model design, the opposite moderating effects of environmental dynamism. Technovation, 103(December 2020), 102225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102225
Kim, R., & Pierce, B.C. (2018). Carbon offsets: An overview for scientific societies.
Kemenko Perekonomian (2024). Diseminasikan Hasil KTT G20 Bali, Kemenko Perekonomian Ajak Civitas Akademisi Bandung Dorong Implementasi Transisi Energi di Indonesia. https://ekon.go.id/publikasi/detail/5064/diseminasikan-hasil-ktt-g20-bali-kemenko-perekonomian-ajak-civitas-akademisi-bandung-dorong-implementasi-transisi-energi-di-indonesia
Messerli, P., Murniningtyas, E., Eloundou-Enyegue, P., Foli, E. G., Furman, E., Glassman, A., ... & Van Ypersele, J. P. (2019). Global Sustainable Development Report 2019: The Future Is Now–Science For Achieving Sustainable Development.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage.
Nazir, Moh. 2005. Metodologi Penelitian. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Moleong, Lexy. 2013. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi Cetakan ketigapuluhsatu. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.
Polonsky, M. J., Garma, R., & Landreth Grau, S. (2011). Western Consumers’ Understanding of Carbon Offsets and Its Relationship to Behavior. Asia Pacific journal of marketing and logistics, 23, 583-603.
Sugiyono. 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Turra, G. M. S., & Melinda, T. (2021). Personal Attitude, Subjective Norm, and Perceived Behavioral Control: Differentiating Factors of Entrepreneurial Intention of High School Students who are Joining and not Joining the Entrepreneurship Education in an International School. KnE Social Sciences, 2021, 366–377. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i5.8823
Telkomsel. 2024. Inisiasi Program CSR “Telkomsel Jaga Bumi”, Telkomsel Dorong Upaya Kolaboratif Berkelanjutan untuk Jaga Kelestarian Lingkungan Hidup
Uma, Sekaran. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis, Edisi 4. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Utomo, C. E. W., & Hariadi, M. (2016). Strategi Pembangunan Smart City dan Tantangannya bagi Masyarakat Kota. Jurnal Strategi dan Bisnis, 4(2)
Wang, A., Carpenter-Gold, D., & So, A. (2022). Key Governance Issues in California’s Carbon Cap-and-Trade System. SSRN Electronic Journal, May. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4119861
Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A resource-based view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 5,pp. 171-180
Zainurrafiqi, Z., & Amar, S. S. (2021). Pengaruh Innovation Capability Dan Blue Ocean Strategy Terhadap Competitive Advantage Dan Business Performance. Assyarikah: Journal Of Islamic Economic Business, 2(2), 73-100.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adinda Dyah Pitaloka, Poppy Alvianolita Sanistasya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
