MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING IN DESIGNING PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS IN THE HYBRID WORK ERA: IMPLICATIONS FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY AND PERCEIVED FAIRNESS
DOI:
10.54443/morfai.v5i2.3685Published:
2025-07-28Downloads
Abstract
This study explores the role of Adaptive Management Control Systems (AMCS) in enhancing employee performance within hybrid work environments, emphasizing the behavioral factors of perceived fairness and psychological safety. As organizations adapt to remote and hybrid models, management accounting practices must evolve to maintain performance and engagement. This research aims to examine the direct impact of AMCS on performance, the mediating role of fairness perception, and the moderating effect of psychological safety. A quantitative method was employed using a survey of 75 employees working under hybrid arrangements in Indonesia. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that AMCS significantly improves employee performance, both directly and indirectly through perceived fairness. Additionally, psychological safety strengthens the relationship between AMCS and performance. These findings suggest that effective management control in hybrid settings requires attention not only to structure but also to employees’ behavioral and psychological experiences. This study contributes to the development of behaviorally-informed management control systems and offers practical insights for organizations aiming to optimize performance in flexible work environments.
Keywords:
Adaptive Management Control Systems Hybrid Work Perceived Fairness Psychological Safety Employee PerformanceReferences
Ainurrofiq, I., & Amir, M. T. (2022). Penerapan hybrid working model terhadap perubahan budaya kerja dan nilai organisasi. Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(8), 3355–3368.
Burney, L. L., Henle, C. A., & Widener, S. K. (2009). A path model examining the relations among strategic performance measurement system characteristics, organizational justice, and extra-and in-role performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3–4), 305–321.
Chenhall, R. H., & Moers, F. (2015). The role of innovation in the evolution of management accounting and its integration into management control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 47, 1–13.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta‐analytic review and extension. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 113–165.
Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9–22.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sartedt, M. (2022). Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.
Hall, M. (2008). The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(2–3), 141–163.
Hamdy, K. (2024). Employee Well-Being and Productivity: Strategies for Hybrid Work Models in Post-Pandemic Era. Journal of Social Science Vol, 1(6), 296–306.
Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., De Vet, H. C. W., & Van Der Beek, A. J. (2014). Construct validity of the individual work performance questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56(3), 331–337.
Simons, R. (1994). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Harvard Business Press.
Wagner III, J. A., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (2020). Organizational behavior: Securing competitive advantage. Routledge.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Henny Rakhmawati, Bondan Subagyo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




