DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPUTATIONAL THINKING TEST INSTRUMENT BASED ON THE CLASSPOINT LEARNING APPLICATION WITHIN A STEAM PROJECT
DOI:
10.54443/morfai.v5i4.4223Published:
2025-10-14Downloads
Abstract
Computational Thinking (CT) is a critical skill that must be mastered in the 21st century to understand and participate effectively in a computer-driven world. Recently, the integration of STEAM-based learning and the use of educational media applications have emerged as strategic approaches to foster CT development. To evaluate the extent to which CT is successfully cultivated through STEAM learning processes, a valid and reliable test instrument is required. This study aims to develop a CT test instrument based on the ClassPoint application within a STEAM project framework. The research employs a development methodology using the ADDIE model, which includes the stages of Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. The research subjects were university students enrolled in a Discrete Mathematics course. The test instrument was reviewed by subject matter experts and media experts. Content validity was assessed using Aiken’s V index, while item validity, reliability, and difficulty level were analyzed using the Rasch model with the Winsteps software. The results indicate that the instrument possesses high content validity, strong reliability (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.89), and a well-distributed range of item difficulty levels. Therefore, the developed instrument is deemed suitable for effectively and efficiently measuring students’ Computational Thinking abilities in the context of STEAM-based learning supported by interactive technology.Keywords:
Instrument, Computational Thinking, Classpoint, STEAMReferences
Abdelrady, A. H., & Akram, H. (2022). An Empirical Study of ClassPoint Tool Application in Enhancing EFLStudents’ Online Learning Satisfaction. Systems, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10050154
Abuhassna, H., Alnawajha, S., Awae, F., Mohamed Adnan, M. A. Bin, & Edwards, B. I. (2024). Synthesizing technology integration within the Addie model for instructional design: A comprehensive systematic literature review. Journal of Autonomous Intelligence, 7(5), 1546. https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i5.1546
Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(4), 391-407.
Azzahra, S., & Fauzan, S. (2023). Computational Thinking of Accounting Students in Terms of Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 33(1), 96–117.
Bahrum, S., Wahid, N., & Ibrahim, N. (2017). Integration of STEM Education in Malaysia and Why to STEAM. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 645–654. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i6/3027
Deviana, D. (2024). The Influence of STEM Learning (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) Assisted with Android Media on Students’ Learning Interest. International Journal of Applied and Advanced Multidisciplinary Research, 2(4), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijaamr.v2i4.1627
Denning, P. J. (2017). Remaining trouble spots with computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 60(6), 33-39.
Grover, S., Pea, R., & Cooper, S. (2015). Designing for deeper learning in a blended computer science course for middle school students. Computer Science Education, 25(2), 199-237.
Hamidah, M. H., & Wulandari, S. S. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Berbasis Hots Menggunakan Aplikasi “Quizizz.” Efisiensi : Kajian Ilmu Administrasi, 18(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.21831/efisiensi.v18i1.36997
Haniah, R. N., & Waluyo, M. (2024). Development of Computational Mathematic Thinking Test Instruments Based On Computered Based Test. Mathline : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(3), 675–690. https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v9i3.648
Inasari, L., Lidinillah, D. A. M., & Prehanto, A. (2023). Pengembangan instrumen tes computational thinking Siswa Sekolah Dasar melalui analisis RASCH model. COLLASE (Creative of Learning Students Elementary Education), 6(1), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.22460/collase.v1i1.16188
Indonesia, B. (2019). Tantangan Bebras Indonesia 2019.
Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zaranis, N. (2021). Developing fundamental programming concepts and computational thinking with ScratchJr in preschool education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(1), 103-110.
Lee, I., Martin, F., Denner, J., Coulter, B., Allan, W., Erickson, J., ... & Werner, L. (2019). Computational thinking for youth in practice. ACM Inroads, 10(2), 38-45.
Lestari, I. F. (2019). Pendekatan Science , Technology , Engineering , and Mathematics ( STEM ) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Fisika Siswa pada Konsep Tekanan Hidrostatis. Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Garut, 13(1), 103–109.
Lisa, Y., Hayati, S., Anggarini, V., & Yayuk, E. (2023). Peningkatan Kecerdasan Logis Matematis Melalui Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Pada Siswa Kelas 1 SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 16(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.33369/pgsd.
Mariana, E. P., & Kristanto, Y. D. (2023a). Integrasi Pembelajaran STEAM dan Computational Thinking : Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Peserta Didik dalam Sebuah Pembelajaran Inovatif. Edarxif, 2019, 1–11. https://edarxiv.org/ruwm5/
Mariana, E. P., & Kristanto, Y. D. (2023b). Integrating STEAM Education and Computational Thinking: Analysis of Students’ Critical and Creative Thinking Skills in an Innovative Teaching and Learning. Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal, 13(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v13i1.241
Mariana, E. putri, & Kristanto, Y. dwi. (2022). Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal Volume 12, No. 1 (2022)Integrating STEAM Education and Computational Thinking: Analysis of Students’ Critical and Creative Thinking Skills in an Innovative Teaching and Learning. 12(1), 11–36.
Moreno-León, J., Robles, G., & Román-González, M. (2015). Towards computing for everyone: Computational literacy and using Dr. Scratch. Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 810-816.
Mukhibin, A., Herman, T., Aulia, L. S., & Firdaus, H. (2024). Integrating Computational Thinking in STEM Learning: An Effort to Improve Students’ Problem-Solving Skills. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v13i1.1975
Ni’mah, A. M., & Supriyo. (2024). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis Classpoint Pada Materi Relasi dan Fungsi di SMPN 4 Pasuruan 1,2. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS), 8(1), 46.
Peterson, C. (2003). Bringing ADDIE to life: instructional design at its best - learning & technology library (LearnTechLib). Journal of Educatioanal Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(3), 227–241. http://www.learntechlib.org/p/2074/
Raqzitya, A. F., & Agung, A. A. G. (2022). E-Modul Berbasis Pendidikan Karakter Sebagai Sumber Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas VII. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 10(1), 108–116. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JEU/article/view/41590
Rima Aksen Cahdriyana, R. R. (2017). Berpikir Komputasi Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking, XI(1), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_13
Rohman, S., & Syahid, I. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Matematika Berbasis Taksonomi Fink. Jemi, 1(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.61815/jemi.v1i2.307
Román-González, M., Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 1(1), 1-15.
Sharma, K., Papavlasopoulou, S., & Giannakos, M. N. (2022). Coding games and robots to enhance computational thinking: How collaboration and engagement moderate achievement. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 31, 100345.
Spatioti, A. G., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2022). A Comparative Study of the ADDIE Instructional Design Model in Distance Education. Information (Switzerland), 13(9), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13090402
Sudarsana, I. K., Nakayanti, A. R., Sapta, A., Haimah, Satria, E., Saddhono, K., Achmad Daengs, G. S., Putut, E., Helda, T., & Mursalin, M. (2019). Technology Application in Education and Learning Process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1363(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1363/1/012061
Tan, Q., & Salas-Pilco, S. Z. (2024). Computational Thinking in Asia-Pacific K-12 STEAM Education: A Systematic Review. IEIR 2024 - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Education and Intelligent Research, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEIR62538.2024.10959898
Triatmaja, A. K., Wahyuni, M. E., Setyanto, B. N., Sudarma, R. T., & Oktavian, W. F. (2021). Optimalisasi Kemampuan Guru Melalui Pelatihan Kuis Interaktif Secara Daring Berbasis Teknologi Informasi. Jurnal Surya Masyarakat, 4(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.26714/jsm.4.1.2021.45-51
Tsakeni, M. (2024). Exploring Design Principles for STEAM Learning Activities Development by Science and Technology Teachers. Educational Research for Social Change, 13(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.17159/2221-4070/2024/v13i1a6
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.
Yakman, G. (2012). STEAM education: An overview of creating a model of integrative education. Presents at the National Science Teachers Association Conference.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Deviana, Ni Putu Desy Damayanthi, I Gede Putu Adhitya Prayoga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
