EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW: A CASE STUDY OF DUE DILIGENCE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION DEFORESTATION-FREE REGULATION

Authors

Maranatha Lisatyaningrum Hainekam Fobia , Najwa Yorri Nordyaningrum

DOI:

10.54443/morfai.v5i4.4226

Published:

2025-10-08

Downloads

Abstract

The development of lifestyles and the complexity of human problems have led to changes in the concepts of sovereignty and national boundaries. One such complexity is environmental issues, the implications of which are not limited to one or a few countries but to the entire global community. Therefore, regulations aimed at environmental sustainability and preservation have become a primary objective of transnational activities. Deforestation is an international concern that requires serious attention. This spirit is manifested by the European Union in the European Union Deforestation-Free Regulation, which ensures that export products to the EU market are not made from materials derived from or through deforestation. This paper describes how the EUDR uses extraterritorial jurisdiction to strengthen a green economic climate, but at the same time, opens up weaknesses in sovereignty for developing countries that are exporters. This paper uses the theory of state sovereignty and the fundamental principles of international contract law as references. The research method used is a normative research method with a conceptual approach and a legislative approach.

Keywords:

State Sovereignty Extraterritorial Measures Due Diligence EUDR

References

Book

Adolf, Huala, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Kontrak Internasional (Refika Aditama 2010).

Badrulzaman, Mariam Darus, Aneka Hukum Bisnis (Mandar Maju 2005).

Brownlie, I. (Ed.). 1997. Dokumen-dokumen pokok hak asasi manusia. Jakarta: UI Press.

Buergenthal, T. 2009. International human rights in a nutshell (4th ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.

Charpentier, Jean, Institutions Internationales, vol 158 of Mémentos Dalloz (Mémentos Dalloz 1972).

Chayes, A., & Chayes, A. H. 1995. The new sovereignty: Compliance with international regulatory agreements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Kusumaatmadja, M. 1978. Pengantar hukum internasional. Bandung: Bina Cipta.

Mauna, Boer, Hukum Internasional: Pengertian Peranan dan Fungsi dalam Era Dinamika Global (Penerbit Alumni 2000).

Margolies, Daniel S, Spaces of Law in American Foreign Relations: Extradition and Extraterritoriality in the Borderlands and Beyond, 1877–1898 (University of Georgia Press 2011).

Putra, Ida Bagus Wyasa, Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan, Hukum Perdagangan Internasional (Refika Aditama 2017).

Ryngaert, C., & Parrish, A. (Eds.). 2023. Introduction to the research handbook on extraterritoriality in international law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Salim, HS, Hukum Kontrak: Teori dan Teknik Penyusunan Kontrak (Sinar Grafika 2010).

Shaw, M. N. 2008. International law (6th ed., reprint). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Strong, C. F. 1972. Modern political constitutions: An introduction to the comparative study of their history and existing forms. London: Sidgwick and Jackson.

Van Kooten, G. C., & Bulte, E. H. 2000. The economics of nature: Managing biological assets. Oxford: Blackwells.

Book

Chakravarty, Sumit, et.al., ‘Deforestation: Causes, Effects and Control Strategies’ Okia Clement Akais (ed), Global Perspectives on Sustainable Forest Management (IntechOpen 2012).

Journal

Aryudhanty, Desvia Dwi, et.al., ‘Pros and Cons of Application of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in International Law: Various Practice in Southeast Asian Countries’ (2023) 2(1) International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia 57.

Krisch, Nico, ‘International Law in Times of Hegemony’ (2005) 16 EJIL 369.

Aryudhanty, D. D., Yen, L. T., & Chan, N. J. 2023. Pros and cons of application of extraterritorial jurisdiction in international law: Various practices in Southeast Asian countries. International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia, 2(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.15294/ildisea.v2i1.58389

Charpentier, J. 1972. Institutions internationales (Vol. 158). Paris: Mémentos Dalloz.

Colangelo, A. J. 2014. What is extraterritorial jurisdiction. Cornell Law Review, 99, 1303–1358.

Krisch, N. 2005. International law in times of hegemony. European Journal of International Law, 16, 369–408.

Maier, H. G. 1983. Interest balancing and extraterritorial jurisdiction. American Journal of Comparative Law, 31(3), 579–597.

Margolies, D. S. 2011. Spaces of law in American foreign relations: Extradition and extraterritoriality in the borderlands and beyond, 1877–1898. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

Utami, K., & Puspita, N. Y. [n.d.]. Ratio decidendi penerapan prinsip yuridiksi teritorial objektif dan perlindungan dalam ekstradisi Maria Pauline Lumowa.

Perjanjian Internasional dan Keputusan Arbitrase

European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR)

Permanent Court of Arbitration, Island of Palmas (US v Netherlands), 2 RIAA 829 (1928).

Author Biographies

Maranatha Lisatyaningrum Hainekam Fobia, Universitas Sugeng Hartono

Author Origin : Indonesia

Najwa Yorri Nordyaningrum, Universitas Sugeng Hartono

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Maranatha Lisatyaningrum Hainekam Fobia, & Najwa Yorri Nordyaningrum. (2025). EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW: A CASE STUDY OF DUE DILIGENCE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION DEFORESTATION-FREE REGULATION. Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI), 5(4), 5955–5966. https://doi.org/10.54443/morfai.v5i4.4226

Similar Articles

<< < 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.