CONTINUOUS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT: MOVING BEYOND THE ANNUAL REVIEW

Authors

Amalia Natasya , Ramon Zamora , Lukmanul Hakim

DOI:

10.54443/morfai.v6i1.4676

Published:

2025-12-13

Downloads

Abstract

This paper examines the transformative impact of implementing a structured real-time feedback system within organizations, moving beyond traditional annual review cycles. Quantitative data from a two-year study reveals that normalizing immediate, project-based feedback led to a 50% increase in the specificity and actionability of feedback provided. This shift correlated with significant performance improvements, including a 15-20% rise in client-facing metrics like customer satisfaction and a 22-point increase in employee engagement scores related to developmental growth. The analysis explores the neurocognitive advantage of immediate feedback, where the proximity to events enhances learning and retention, thereby systematically dismantling the "feedback is scary" narrative and fostering psychological safety. Crucially, the findings demonstrate that success is contingent on building a shared organizational skillset through training in frameworks like SBI (Situation-Behavior-Impact) and leveraging technology to integrate feedback seamlessly into daily workflows, transforming it from a managerial burden into a collective responsibility for continuous improvement.

Keywords:

real-time feedback, psychological safety, skill development, feedback receptivity, performance improvement

References

Aguinis, H., & Burgi-Tian, J. (2022). Performance Reviews are Dead, Long Live Performance Management! Management and Business Review, 2(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/2694105820220201003

Batat, W. (2022). The employee experience (EMX) framework for well-being: an agenda for the future. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 44(5), 993–1013. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2022-0133

Harvey, G. (2019). Corporate wellness: what, why not and whither? Employee Relations: The International Journal, 41(4), 638–648. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-06-2018-0151

Islam, M. S., & Amin, M. (2022). A systematic review of human capital and employee well-being: putting human capital back on the track. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(5/6), 504–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-12-2020-0177

Miller, A. J. (2024). The key to human performance: elevating wellbeing by bridging skills with meaningful work. Strategic HR Review, 23(1), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-11-2023-0065

Mueller-Hanson, R. (2021). Work Performance Management and Assessment. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.25

Murphy, K., & DeNisi, A. (2023). New approaches to dealing with performance management: getting rid of performance appraisals is not the answer. IIM Ranchi Journal of Management Studies, 2(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/IRJMS-09-2023-0074

Murphy, K. R. (2020). The Past, Present, and Future of Performance Management. In Performance Management Transformation (pp. 318–342). Oxford University PressNew York. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190942878.003.0016

Murphy, L. (2025). Wellbeing in the age of virtual teams and workplace automation – a systematic review and future research agenda. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 33(5), 1039–1065. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-08-2023-3938

Nyathani, R. (2023). AI in Performance Management: Redefining Performance Appraisals in the Digital Age. Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Cloud Computing, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.47363/JAICC/2023(2)134

Pulakos, E. D., & Battista, M. (Eds.). (2020). Performance Management Transformation. Oxford University PressNew York. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190942878.001.0001

Pulakos, E. D., Mueller-Hanson, R., & Arad, S. (2019). The Evolution of Performance Management: Searching for Value. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015009

Sahlin, J., & Angelis, J. (2019). Performance management systems: reviewing the rise of dynamics and digitalization. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1642293

Sam, M. J. (2020). Redefining Performance Evaluation: General Electric, Deloitte and Adobe. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJMBRAVOL20IS17PG1

Tarallo, M. (2021). From Managing to Motivating: Performance Evaluation. In Modern Management and Leadership (pp. 53–59). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003095620-9

Verma, R., & Mishra, S. (2024). The Future of Performance Management: Shifting from Annual Reviews to Continuous Feedback. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 12(9), 216–229. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.64153

Author Biographies

Amalia Natasya, Universitas Riau Kepulauan

Ramon Zamora, Universitas Riau Kepulauan

Lukmanul Hakim, Universitas Riau Kepulauan

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Amalia Natasya, Ramon Zamora, & Lukmanul Hakim. (2025). CONTINUOUS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT: MOVING BEYOND THE ANNUAL REVIEW. Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI), 6(1), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.54443/morfai.v6i1.4676

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.