ACTIO PAULIANA IN BANKRUPTCY: EFFORTS TO CANCEL DEBTOR'S LEGAL ACTS

Authors

Henry Apan , Henny Saida Flora , Etty Sri Wahyuni , Ari Prabowo

DOI:

10.54443/morfai.v5i6.4678

Published:

2025-12-09

Downloads

Abstract

Actio pauliana is a fundamental legal instrument in the Indonesian bankruptcy system to protect creditors' interests from debtor's detrimental legal acts. This research aims to analyze the application of actio pauliana based on Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (UUK-PKPU), focusing on filing requirements, burden of proof, and practical challenges in court proceedings. The research method used is normative juridical with statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches. The results show that actio pauliana as an effort to annul debtor's legal acts has a strategic role in maximizing the bankruptcy estate (boedel pailit) for creditor debt settlement. However, the effectiveness of actio pauliana implementation still faces various obstacles, particularly regarding the heavy burden of proof on curators, differing judicial perceptions in assessing debtor fraud elements, and legal protection for good faith third parties. This research recommends the need for reformulating actio pauliana provisions to provide better legal certainty for all parties involved in bankruptcy proceedings.

Keywords:

Actio Pauliana Bankruptcy Annulment of Legal Acts Creditor Curator

References

Amboro, F. P. Y. (2020). Hukum kepailitan: Penerapan hukum kepailitan pada korporasi di Indonesia, Amerika Serikat, Inggris, dan Australia [Bankruptcy law: Application of bankruptcy law in corporations in Indonesia, the United States, England, and Australia]. Setara Press.

Anisah, S. (2008). Perlindungan kepentingan kreditor dan debitor dalam hukum kepailitan di Indonesia [Protection of creditor and debtor interests in Indonesian bankruptcy law]. Total Media.

Anisah, S. (2009). Perlindungan terhadap kepentingan kreditor melalui actio pauliana. Jurnal Hukum, 16(2), 214-230.

Busroh, F. F., Khairo, F., & Zhafirah, P. D. (2024). The actio pauliana principle in Indonesian business law. Halu Oleo Law Review, 8(1), 1-13.

Fuady, M. (2017). Hukum pailit dalam teori dan praktek (Edisi revisi) [Bankruptcy law in theory and practice (Revised edition)]. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Hukumonline. (2022). Syarat pengajuan actio pauliana oleh kurator kepailitan [Requirements for filing actio pauliana by bankruptcy curator]. Retrieved from https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/syarat-pengajuan-actio-pauliana-oleh-kurator-kepailitan-cl1691/

Ilyas, A., & Nursal, M. (2020). Kumpulan asas-asas hukum [Collection of legal principles]. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Indonesia. (n.d.). Civil Code [Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek)].

Isnaeni, M. (2017). Pengantar hukum jaminan kebendaan [Introduction to security law]. LaksBang.

Kamilah, A. (2021). Penerapan prinsip actio pauliana dalam kepailitan dan perlindungan hukumnya terhadap pembeli yang beritikad baik. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 7(2), 196-215.

Mantili, R. (2021). Actio pauliana sebagai upaya perlindungan bagi kreditor menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dan Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU). ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 6(2), 21-38.

Medan Commercial Court. (n.d.). Decision Number 3/Pdt.Sus-lain/PN Niaga Mdn [Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Medan Nomor 3/Pdt.Sus-lain/PN Niaga Mdn].

Medan Commercial Court. (2015). Decision Number 07/Pdt.Sus-Actio Pauliana/2015/Pengadilan.Niaga.Mdn [Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Medan Nomor 07/Pdt.Sus-Actio Pauliana/2015/Pengadilan.Niaga.Mdn].

Najah, L., Nurhasanah, V., Rayana, N., & Sapitri, N. (2023). Analisis actio pauliana sebagai upaya kurator dalam kepailitan. Diponegoro Private Law Review, 7(2), 122-141.

Nugroho, S. A. (2018). Hukum kepailitan di Indonesia: Dalam teori dan praktik serta penerapan hukumnya [Bankruptcy law in Indonesia: In theory and practice and its legal application]. Prenadamedia Group.

Nurdin, A. (2004). Masalah seputar actio pauliana. In E. Yuhassarie (Ed.), Kepailitan dan transfer aset secara melawan hukum [Bankruptcy and unlawful asset transfer]. Pusat Pengkajian Hukum.

Panatagama, A. (2020). Actio pauliana dalam kepailitan yang melebihi jangka waktu satu tahun. Jurist-Diction, 3(4), 1349-1368.

Republic of Indonesia. (2004). Law Number 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations [Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang]. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2004 Number 131.

Sastrawidjaja, M. S. (2006). Hukum kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang [Bankruptcy law and suspension of debt payment obligations]. Alumni.

Setyabudi, A. H., Janisriwati, S., & Syahrial, I. W. (2023). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pihak ketiga dalam actio pauliana. Jurnal Magister Hukum ARGUMENTUM, 9(1), 119-127.

Shubhan, M. H. (2009). Hukum kepailitan: Prinsip, norma, dan praktik di peradilan [Bankruptcy law: Principles, norms, and practice in courts]. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sinaga, N. A., & Sulisrudatin, N. (2018). Hukum kepailitan dan permasalahannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 7(1), 84-101.

Sjahdeini, S. R. (2022). Hukum kepailitan: Memahami Faillissementsverordening juncto Undang-Undang No. 4 Tahun 1998 [Bankruptcy law: Understanding Faillissementsverordening in conjunction with Law No. 4 of 1998]. Grafiti.

Subekti. (2014). Hukum perjanjian [Contract law]. Intermasa.

Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2021). Cassation Decision Number 560 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021 [Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 560 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021].

Syahrin, M. A. (2017). Actio pauliana: Konsep hukum dan problematikanya. Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 607-622.

Central Jakarta Commercial Court. (2020). Decision Number 06/Pdt.Sus.Gugatan Lain-Lain AP/2020/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst [Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor 06/Pdt.Sus.Gugatan Lain-Lain AP/2020/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst].

Wiguna, I. N., Andaretna, L. M., Budianto, M. C., & Vala, T. A. (2024). Legal protection for third parties in good faith on actio pauliana litigation in bankruptcy proceedings. Yuridika, 39(2), 181-210.

Author Biographies

Henry Apan, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

Author Origin : Indonesia

Henny Saida Flora, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas

Author Origin : Indonesia

Etty Sri Wahyuni, Universitas Batam

Author Origin : Indonesia

Ari Prabowo, Universitas Potensi Utama

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Henry Apan, Henny Saida Flora, Etty Sri Wahyuni, & Ari Prabowo. (2025). ACTIO PAULIANA IN BANKRUPTCY: EFFORTS TO CANCEL DEBTOR’S LEGAL ACTS. Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI), 5(6), 8814–8818. https://doi.org/10.54443/morfai.v5i6.4678

Similar Articles

<< < 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)