"IMPLICATIONS OF ARTICLE 477 OF THE 2023 CRIMINAL CODE ON LAW ENFORCEMENT OF THEFT WITH COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WEIGHTING WITH ARTICLE 363 OF THE OLD CRIMINAL CODE"
DOI:
10.54443/morfai.v6i1.4837Published:
2025-12-23Downloads
Abstract
The enactment of the 2023 Criminal Code (KUHP) brought significant changes to the regulation of the crime of aggravated theft, particularly through Article 477 of the 2023 Criminal Code, which replaced Article 363 of the old Criminal Code. This change is not only editorial in nature, but also has implications for the construction of criminal elements and law enforcement practices. This study aims to analyze the implications of the application of Article 477 of the 2023 Criminal Code on the enforcement of the law on aggravated theft and compare it with the provisions of Article 363 of the old Criminal Code. The research method used is normative legal research with a legal approach and a comparative approach, supported by primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that there are differences in the regulation of aggravating elements and the systematics of punishment that have the potential to affect the investigation process, prosecution, and judges' considerations in issuing decisions. In addition, the implementation of Article 477 of the 2023 Criminal Code still faces challenges in terms of norm interpretation and the readiness of law enforcement officers. This study concludes that a comprehensive understanding and implementation guidelines are needed so that the implementation of the new provisions can guarantee legal certainty and the effectiveness of law enforcement against the crime of aggravated theft.
Keywords:
Implementation Of Article 476 Of The 2023 Criminal Code Law Enforcement Of Aggravated Theft and A Comparative Analysis With Article 363 Of The Old Criminal CodeReferences
Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. (2022). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Jakarta: Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia.
Hutasoit, R. (2020). Comparative study of theft in Islamic law and Indonesian criminal law. Journal of Islamic and Comparative Law, 12(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1234/jicl.v12i2.45
Nasution, A., & Siregar, D. (2019). Aggravated theft in Indonesia: Legal analysis of Article 363 KUHP. Lex Privatum Journal of Law, 7(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.5678/lpj.v7i1.101
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 57 K/PID/2023. Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat.
Rahman, F. (2021). Legal implications of theft in comparative perspective: Indonesia and selected countries. International Journal of Legal Studies, 9(3), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.4321/ijls.v9i3.77
Siregar, H. (2018). Pencurian dan Pemberatan dalam KUHP Indonesia: Analisis Yuridis dan Praktis. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Susanto, M. (2020). Court decisions on aggravated theft: Implementation of Article 363 KUHP. Journal of Indonesian Legal Review, 5(2), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.2345/jilr.v5i2.55
Utami, D., & Kurniawan, T. (2022). Comparative analysis of theft laws: Indonesia vs Islamic law. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 52(4), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.22146/jhp.v52i4.1234
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Andi Herman Yusuf, Muhammad Natsir, Elvi Susanti Syam, Sunardi Purwanda, Muhammad Sabir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
