THE IMPACT OF THE SOUTH CHINA SEA GEOPOLITICAL CONFLICT ON INDONESIA'S INTERNATIONAL TRADE: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF RISK PERCEPTION AND LOGISTICS EFFICIENCY
DOI:
10.5281/zenodo.18811806Published:
2026-01-31Downloads
Abstract
Geopolitical tensions in the South China Sea (SCS) represent a significant external factor that may affect Indonesia’s international trade. As one of the world’s major maritime trade routes, escalating conflicts in the SCS can increase economic uncertainty and weaken national logistics performance. This study aims to analyze the impact of South China Sea geopolitical conflict on Indonesia’s international trade by examining the mediating roles of risk perception and logistics efficiency. The study employs a quantitative causal explanatory approach using quarterly time series data from 2020Q1 to 2024Q4 (n = 20). Geopolitical conflict is proxied by the Geopolitical Risk Index (GPR), risk perception is measured by Indonesia’s World Uncertainty Index (WUI), logistics efficiency is represented by the Logistics Performance Index (LPI), and international trade is measured by total export and import values. Data analysis methods include descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, linear regression, and mediation tests using the Baron and Kenny approach and the Sobel test. The results show that geopolitical conflict has a significant positive effect on risk perception and a significant negative effect on logistics efficiency. Geopolitical conflict also has a significant negative effect on international trade in the direct model. However, after incorporating the mediating variables, the direct effect becomes insignificant. Risk perception and logistics efficiency are found to fully mediate the relationship between geopolitical conflict and Indonesia’s international trade.
Keywords:
Geopolitical Conflict South China Sea International Trade Risk Perception Logistics Efficiency.References
ASEAN Secretariat. (2024). ASEAN Key Figures 2024. ASEAN Publishing.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik perdagangan luar negeri Indonesia 2020–2024. BPS RI.
Bank Indonesia. (2024). Laporan Perekonomian Indonesia 2020-2024. BI Press.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Caldara, D., & Iacoviello, M. (2022). Measuring geopolitical risk. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1194–1225. https://www.geopoliticalriskindex.com
Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (2020). Dependency and Development in Latin America. University of California Press.
CSIS Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. (2024). South China Sea Military and Maritime Incidents Database. Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Dunning, J. H. (2019). The eclectic paradigm of international production. International Business Review, 28(4), 475–490.
Dos Santos, T. (1970). The structure of dependence. American Economic Review, 60(2), 231–236.
Flint, C. (2021). Introduction to Geopolitics (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Howell, L. (2022). Political Risk Assessment Handbook. Oxford University Press.
Krugman, P. R., & Obstfeld, M. (2021). International Economics: Theory and Policy (12th ed.). Pearson.
Liu, Y., Zhang, W., & Chen, P. (2024). Geopolitical risk and trade flows in ASEAN countries. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 33(2), 145–167.
Ministry of Trade of Indonesia. (2024). Indonesia Trade Outlook 2020–2024. Kementerian Perdagangan RI.
Putri, A., & Halim, F. (2022). South China Sea tensions and Indonesia’s economic vulnerability. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 12(1), 44–59.
Rachman, T. (2024). Geopolitical conflict and supply chain disruption in ASEAN. Jurnal Ekonomi & Kebijakan Publik, 15(3), 88–105.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/270723
UNCTAD. (2024). Review of Maritime Transport 2024. United Nations Publications.
Weber, E., Blais, A., & Betz, N. (2021). Risk perception and decision-making under uncertainty. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 34(4), 567–583.
Wijayanto, H., & Rahmawati, N. (2024). Maritime security and logistics efficiency in Indonesia. Journal of Transportation & Logistics Studies, 9(1), 15–28.
World Bank. (2023). Logistics Performance Index Database. World Bank Group.
World Uncertainty Index. (2024). Global Economic Uncertainty Dataset. Stanford University & IMF.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Riza Aini, Leni Hartati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
