EVALUATION OF THE THREE IN ONE (3IN1) BEREAVEMENT PROGRAM IN BENGKULU CITY
Published:
2026-02-28Downloads
Abstract
The 3in1 Bereavement Program initiated by the Bengkulu City Government is an innovation in population administration services that integrates the issuance of death certificates, updates to Family Cards, and renewal of electronic ID cards in a single process through a proactive service delivery mechanism. Although this program has been running since 2021 and demonstrates high effectiveness, it still operates without a formal legal foundation in the form of a Mayor's Regulation, relying solely on a Mayor's Decree. This study aims to evaluate program implementation using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) model and identify factors contributing to delays in regulatory formalization. Using a qualitative case study approach, the research employs in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis. Evaluation results show the program is effective across context, input, process, and product dimensions. However, delays in regulatory formalization are caused by four main factors: prioritization of responsiveness over legal certainty, limitations in legal human resources at the Department of Population and Civil Registration, complexity of regional regulation formation procedures, and weak momentum in the legislative process. The implications of the absence of formal regulation create vulnerabilities regarding program sustainability, limited accountability, and obstacles to policy replication.
Keywords:
Regulatory formalization public service innovation legal certainty 3in1 Bereavement Program government responsivenessReferences
Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 189–206.
Borins, S. (2014). The Persistence of Innovation in Government. Brookings Institution Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications.
Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2020). The Knowns and Unknowns of Policy Instrument Analysis: Policy Tools and the Current Research Agenda on Policy Mixes. SAGE Open, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900568
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kota Bengkulu. (2022). Laporan Evaluasi Program 3in1 Duka Cita Tahun 2022. Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kota Bengkulu.
Dwiyanto, A. (2017). Manajemen Pelayanan Publik: Peduli, Inklusif, dan Kolaboratif (Edisi 2). Gadjah Mada University Press.
Dwiyanto, A. (2022). Manajemen Pelayanan Publik: Peduli, Inklusif, dan Kolaboratif (Edisi 3). Gadjah Mada University Press.
Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Brookings Institution Press.
Hartley, J. (2021). Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00447
Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative Innovation: A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136
Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press.
Kumorotomo, W. (2023). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik dan Dilema Regulasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21831/jkmp.v11i1
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power (pp. 1–37). Cambridge University Press.
Marzuki, P. M. (2020). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Kencana Prenada Media Group.
OECD. (2021). Innovation in the Public Sector: Trends and Challenges. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k3xr8k0v0lt-en
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice - Michael Quinn Patton - Google Books. In Sage Publication.
Peters, B. G. (2018). The Politics of Bureaucracy: An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration.
Prasojo, E., Maksum, I. R., & Kurniawan, T. (2018). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik di Daerah: Kajian Implementasi dan Dampak. Departemen Ilmu Administrasi FISIP UI.
Prasojo, E., Maksum, I. R., & Kurniawan, T. (2022). Reformasi Birokrasi dan Inovasi Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia. UI Press.
Raharjo, S. T., & Yuliana, V. (2020). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan di Era Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 11(2), 123–138.
Ridwan, H. R. (2021). Hukum Administrasi Negara (Edisi Revisi). RajaGrafindo Persada.
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford University Press.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Evaluation (pp. 31–62). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
UNDP. (2023). Digital Identity and Civil Registration: Trends and Challenges in Developing Countries. United Nations Development Programme.
Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Meiri, S. (2019). New Public Management Values and Person-Organization Fit: A Socio-Psychological Approach and Empirical Examination among Public Sector Personnel. Public Administration, 86(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00711.x
Wibowo, A. S., Rahman, F., & Susanto, T. D. (2022). Evaluasi Implementasi Inovasi Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 18(1), 45–62.
Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy Capacity: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Policy Competences and Capabilities. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.001
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. In Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research (Vol. 53, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108
Yuliandri. (2021). Asas-Asas Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan yang Baik: Gagasan Pembentukan Undang-Undang Berkelanjutan. RajaGrafindo Persada
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anshar Amin, Sugeng Suharto, Adityo Pratikno Ramadhan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
