JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF THE “STRONG” TRADEMARK DISPUTE BETWEEN HARDWOOD PRIVATE LIMITED AND PT UNILEVER INDONESIA TBK (A STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 332 K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2021)
Published:
2026-02-28Downloads
Abstract
The “STRONG” trademark dispute between Hardwood Private Limited and PT Unilever Indonesia Tbk has led to overlapping ownership claims and divergent legal interpretations at different judicial levels. This research seeks to assess the implementation of the legal certainty principle for the initial trademark registrant and to evaluate the legal reasoning adopted by the Supreme Court in Decision Number 332 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021 in light of Law Number 20 of 2016. Employing a normative legal research framework, this study applies qualitative analysis through statutory and jurisprudential approaches. The results indicate inconsistencies in applying the first-to-file doctrine, as the Supreme Court granted the trademark rights to PT Unilever by characterizing “Strong” as a descriptive common term that cannot be exclusively owned, notwithstanding Hardwood’s status as the earliest registrant. These findings underscore the importance of conducting thorough substantive examinations by the Directorate General of Intellectual Property during trademark registration to avoid overlapping rights. Additionally, there is a pressing need to reinforce regulations governing the use of common terms in trademarks to promote justice and legal certainty for prior registrants and to prevent monopolization of language in commercial practices.
Keywords: Trademarks; Legal Certainty; Trademark Disputes
Keywords:
Trademarks Legal Certainty Trademark Disputes Juridical Analysis PT Unilever IndonesiaReferences
Book
Agustini. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Teori dan Panduan Praktis Analisis Data Kualitatif). PT. Mifandi Mandiri Digital, Deli Serdang
Baskoro, S, B. (2015). Implementasi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Hak Cipta, Merek, Paten, Desain Industri). Dwi – Quantum, Yogyakarta
Eddy, D. (2017) Dinamika Hukum Dalam Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Fakultas Hukum UNPAD dan Penerbit P.T Alumni, Bandung
Mukti Arto. (2004). Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama. Pustaka Pelajar.
Nurwati. (2022). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Hak Cipta Sebagai Jaminan Kredit Dalam Prespektif Hak Kebendaan. PT. Rajawali Buana Pusaka.
Sudikno, M. (1993). Bab-Bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti: Bandung
Syahrani, R, H. ( 2009). Kata-Kata Kunci Mempelajari Ilmu Hukum. PT. Alumni, Bandung
Journal Articles
Albert, K. & Rahaditya, R. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemegang Hak Atas Merek dalam Sengketa Merek. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora, dan Politik (JIHHP). Vol.4 no.4
Asep, S. (2019). Pembatalan Merek Terdaftar Dihubungkan Dengan Asas Kepastian Hukum Bagi Pemilik Merek. Aktualita ( Jurnal Hukum). Vol. 2 No. 1
Fence M, W. (2007). Antinomi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakim. Jurnal Berkala Mimbar Hukum. Vol. 19 No.3
Gunawan, Y. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Terdaftar dan Merek Terkenal Dalam Mewujudkan Perlindungan Hukum. In IBLAM Law Review (Vol. 2).
Hukum, F., Pembangunan Nasional. (2022). Perbandingan Perlindungan Hukum Merek antara Prinsip First to File Hukum Indonesia dan Prinsip First to Use pada Hukum Australia Neisa Ines Tritanaya Wiwin Yulianingsih. Jurnal Tugas Akhir, 2(3), 2807–2863.
Manik, M. (2022). Pengaruh Perdagangan Internasional Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen dan Bisnis. Vol. 23 no. 2
Patrichia W, L. ( 2019). Penyelesaian Sengketa Gugatan Atas Pelanggaran Merek Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis. Lex Et Societatis. Vol. 7 No. 1
Constitution
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis
Internet
https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/pendaftaran-merek-yang-sama-dengan-merek-terkenal-untuk-kelas-barang-yang-berbeda-lt5a4a1655f16a2/ ( diakses pada 22 November 2025 pukul 11.24)
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Geby Sabita Panjaitan, July Esther, Roida Nababan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
