OBSTACLES TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUPREME COURT REGULATION (PERMA) NUMBER 7 OF 2022 ON ELECTRONIC CASE ADMINISTRATION AND ELECTRONIC COURT PROCEEDINGS IN DIVORCE CASES AT THE SLAWI RELIGIOUS COURT, TEGAL REGENCY

Authors

Aziz Mahmud Idris , Sanusi , Soesi Idayanti

Published:

2026-07-27

Downloads

Abstract

The Supreme Court has issued a regulation concerning electronic case administration, namely Supreme Court Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia (PERMA RI) Number 7 of 2022 on Electronic Case Administration in Courts. The purpose of this regulation is stipulated in Article 2 of Supreme Court Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 2022 on Electronic Case Administration in Courts, namely to support the realization of professional, transparent, accountable, effective, efficient, and modern case administration. (PERMA, 2022). In accordance with Supreme Court Regulation Number 7 of 2022 concerning electronic case administration in courts, the scope of the e-Court application generally includes: (1) Online Case Registration (e-Filing), (2) Online Advance Court Fee Payment (e-Payment), (3) Electronic Summons (e-Summons), and (4) Electronic Court Proceedings (e-Litigation). (PERMA, 2021). This study aims to identify the obstacles to the implementation of e-litigation proceedings in divorce cases at the Slawi Religious Court, Tegal Regency. This research employs library research with an empirical juridical approach and qualitative analysis methods, with the Slawi Religious Court Class IA serving as the research object. The main obstacles to the implementation of Supreme Court Regulation Number 7 of 2022 at the Slawi Religious Court include the public's low level of technological literacy (digital divide), unstable internet infrastructure, and difficulties in verifying the defendant's electronic domicile. Other obstacles include limited public understanding of electronic fee-waiver (prodeo) services and technical challenges encountered during virtual court proceedings.

Kata Kunci : Case Obstacles, Electronic Court Proceedings, Effectiveness and Efficiency, Divorce Cases.

 

Keywords:

Case Obstacles Electronic Court Proceedings Effectiveness and Efficiency Divorce Cases

References

Abdurrahman, & Riduan Syahrani. Masalah-Masalah Hukum Perkawinan di Indonesia. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni, 1978.

Ahmad Mujahidin. Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syar'iyah di Indonesia. Jakarta: IKAHI, 2008.

Ahmad Rofiq. Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2015.

Ahmad Sanusi, & Sohari. Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2008.

Ahmadi Anwar. Prinsip-Prinsip Metodologi Research. Yogyakarta: Sumbangsi, 1975.

Aji Prasetyo. "Polemik Syarat Berita Acara Sumpah di e-Court MA." Hukumonline. http://m.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5b5585deb2f37/advokat-dipastikan-tak-bisa-bersidang-jika-tak-mendaftar-di-e-court. Diakses pada 30 September 2018.

Al-Hafidz bin Hajar al-Asqalani. Bulughul al-Maram. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar al-Kutub al-'Alamiyah, t.t.

Amir Syarifuddin. Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.

Amran Suadi. Pembaruan Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia: Menakar Beracara di Pengadilan secara Elektronik. Cetakan II. Jakarta, 2019.

Atho Mudzhar. "Konstruksi Fatwa dalam Islam." Peradilan Agama, Edisi 7, Oktober 2015.

Biro Perencanaan dan Organisasi Badan Urusan Administrasi Mahkamah Agung RI. Buku Panduan E-SKUM & ATR. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI, 2018.

Burhan Ashshofa. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2013.

Chaerul Umam. Ushul Fiqih I. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2000.

Cholid Narbuko, & Abu Achmadi. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara, 2007.

Cole-O Lee, R. Fundamental of the Environment of Business. New York: McGraw-Hill Book, 1986.

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Edisi ke-3. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2000.

Dewa Gede Atmadja. "Asas-Asas Hukum dalam Sistem Hukum." Jurnal Kertha Wicaksana, 12(2), 2018.

Djama'an Nur. Fiqh Munakahat. Cetakan ke-1. Semarang: Dimas, 1993.

Fahmi Putra Hidayat, & Asni Asni. "Efektivitas Penerapan e-Court dalam Penyelesaian Perkara di Pengadilan Agama Makassar." Qadauna, 2(1), 2020.

Fathimah Syaukat Al-Uliyyah. Selamatkan Pernikahan Anda dari Perceraian (Thalak: Sebab-Sebab dan Solusinya). Edisi Indonesia. Bekasi: PT Darul Falah, 2012.

Hairi, P. J. "Antara Prinsip Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat dan Berbiaya Ringan dan Gagasan Pembatasan Perkara Kasasi." Jurnal Negara Hukum, 2(1), 2011.

Lexy J. Moleong. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2013.

M. Idris Ramulyo. Hukum Perkawinan, Hukum Kewarisan, Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama dan Zakat Menurut Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.

M. Taufik Makarao. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2004.

Rahmat Syafi'i. Ilmu Ushul Fiqih. Cetakan III. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2007.

Romi. Wawancara di Pengadilan Agama Gunung Sugih. 2 Maret 2021.

Author Biographies

Aziz Mahmud Idris, Universitas Pancasakti Tegal

Author Origin : Indonesia

Sanusi, Universitas Pancasakti Tegal

Author Origin : Indonesia

Soesi Idayanti, Universitas Pancasakti Tegal

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Aziz Mahmud Idris, Sanusi, & Soesi Idayanti. (2026). OBSTACLES TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUPREME COURT REGULATION (PERMA) NUMBER 7 OF 2022 ON ELECTRONIC CASE ADMINISTRATION AND ELECTRONIC COURT PROCEEDINGS IN DIVORCE CASES AT THE SLAWI RELIGIOUS COURT, TEGAL REGENCY. Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI), 6(5), 7631–7635. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22023839

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)