LEGAL CERTAINTY OF DEBT PAYMENT OBLIGATION SUSPENSION APPLICATIONS FOR APARTMENT DEVELOPER DEBTORS
DOI:
10.54443/morfai.v4i3.2171Published:
2024-10-30Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to examine the legal certainty aspects of debt payment obligation petitions against apartment developer debtors. In the context of bankruptcy law, legal certainty is crucial to protect creditors' rights while also providing adequate protection for debtors experiencing financial distress. However, several issues arise regarding legal certainty in debt payment suspension petitions involving apartment developers. One example is the case of an apartment developer in the Commercial Court Decision No. 97/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2024/PN Niaga Jkt Pst. This research explores the legal certainty surrounding the suspension of debt payment obligation petitions against apartment developer debtors, as governed by Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations. The study finds that the court's decision demonstrates legal protection for debtors by taking into account factual conditions and creditors' rights. This ruling has significant implications for the development of bankruptcy law in Indonesia, particularly in resolving the debts of financially distressed apartment developers. In conclusion, legal certainty in the suspension of debt payment obligation petitions involving apartment developers must be grounded in the principle of justice, ensuring protection for all parties involved in the dispute while maintaining a balance between the rights of debtors and creditors.
Keywords:
Apartment Developer; Bankruptcy; Suspension of Debt Payment ObligationsReferences
Ali, Z. (2013). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Aprita, S., & Qosim, S. (2022). Optimalisasi Wewenang Dan Tanggung Jawab Hakim Pengawas Dalam Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 7(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v7i2.3963
B. Simanjuntak, A. T. (2023). Kedudukan Perjanjian Sewa Dalam Upaya Permohonan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 2(4), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.58344/jhi.v2i4.254
Fatahillah, F., & Winanti, A. (2023). Perbandingan Konsep Hukum Kepailitan Amerika (Chapter 11) dan Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia. Jurnal USM Law Review, 6(3), 1262–1278. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i3.7906
Jenifer, A. (2024). Pembatasan Syarat Pembuktian Secara Sederhana Dalam Kepailitan Melalui Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2023. IURIS STUDIA: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 5(3), 595–599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v5i3.661
Kiemas, A., Matheus, J., & Gunadi, A. (2023). Redefining Bankruptcy Law: Incorporating the Principle of Business Continuity for Fair Debt Resolution. Rechtsidee, 11(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.996
Lufti Nasution, M., Sunarmi, S., & Robert, R. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Upaya Hukum Kasasi Terhadap Putusan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Studi Putusan No. 23/PUU-XIX/2021). Recht Studiosum Law Review, 2(2), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.32734/rslr.v2i2.12105
Madreani, E., & Madjid, N. V. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Perdata Pengembang Terhadap Konsumen atas Kepailitan Perusahaan. Ekasakti Legal Science Journal, 1(1), 79–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.60034/k622zd74
Muharrir, M., Maulana, J., & Zulfikar, M. N. (2023). Kekuatan Hukum Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 tentang Petunjuk Bagi Hakim dalam Mengadili Perkara Permohonan Pencatatan Perkawinan Antar-Umat yang Berbeda Agama dan Kepercayaan. Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 7(2), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v7i1.8462
Pulungan, F. S. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Permohonan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang pada Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 94/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2023/PN Niaga Surabaya. Universitas Andalas.
Puspitasari, L. N., Septiandani, D., Ratna Sediati, D. S., & Sukarna, K. (2021). Problematika Eksekusi Harta Pailit dalam Cross Border Insolvency. Jurnal USM Law Review, 4(2), 743–755. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i2.4238
Putri, C. P. H. (2024). Problematika Hukum Substansi Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 Sebagai Dasar Hukum Pengajuan Kepailitan Buruh. Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v8i1.8095
Putri, G., Fionita, J., & Matheus, J. (2024). Lelang Eksekusi Kepailitan atas Tanah dan Bangunan yang Dimiliki Bersama oleh Pihak Ketiga dan Debitur Pailit. Jurnal Supremasi, 14(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v14i2.3810
Rahmani, I. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Pembeli dalam Kepailitan Pengembang (Developer) Rumah Susun. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 1(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v0i0.1758
Ridwan. (2018). Kedudukan Kurator dalam Melakukan Eksekusi Budel Pailit yang Berimplikasi pada Pelaporan Secara Pidana Suatu Kajian Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 3(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v3i2.1040
Samosir, D. H. D. (2023). Analisis Putusan Terhadap Penetapan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Kepada Yayasan Sari Asih Nusantara Dalam Pembayaran Utang Kepada Kreditur (Study Kasus : Putusan 24/Pdt.Sus.PKPU/2021/PN Medan). Universitas Medan Area.
Saputri, E. M., Waspiah, W., & Arifin, R. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen dalam Hal Pengembang (Developer) Apartemen Dinyatakan Pailit. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 2(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v2i2.1936
Sirait, P., Junaidi, M., Sudarmanto, K., & Sofyan, S. (2023). Pencabutan Putusan Pailit Dalam Hal Harta Pailit Tidak Cukup Untuk Membayar Biaya Kepailitan. Jurnal USM Law Review, 6(3), 1279–1294. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i3.7911
Situmorang, F., Sinaulan, R. L., & Ismed, M. (2023). Kajian Hukum Tentang Kedudukan SEMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Atas Undang-Undang Kepailitan Nomor 37 Tahun 2004. Jurnal Studi Interdisipliner Perspektif, 22(2), 117–127. https://ejournal-jayabaya.id/Perspektif/article/view/100
Slamet, S. R., & Olivia, F. (2024). Permohonan Kepailitan atas Developer Apartemen Tidak Memenuhi Persyaratan Fakta yang Terbukti Secara Sederhana Suatu Kajian Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum. Lex Jurnalica, 21(1), 114–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47007/lj.v21i1.7667
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jessica Dharmawan, Richard Chandra Adam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
