IMPLEMENTATION OF FAMILY HOPE PROGRAM (PKH) POLICY IN TASIKMALAYA CITY IN 2016 (Policy Implementation of the Family Hope Program (PKH) In Tasikmalaya City 2016)
Main Article Content
Dandan Haryono
Ishak Kusnandar
Ani Heryani
Based on the observation that the policy implementation of the Keluarga Harapan Program is still weak because of the following, Lack of regular companion meetings, unscheduled socialisation, including with community leaders, the general public, and aid recipients, There is no synergy between local governments as a coordinating team and implementers. Lack of understanding between implementors (assistants) in Tasikmalaya City The purpose of the study was to analyze the political implementation of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in Tasikmalaya City. The method used is qualitative, with descriptive analysis methods. Then the data collection techniques that the author uses are through literature studies and field studies, which include observation, interviews, and documentation; data analysis through data collection; data condensation; and conclusion drawing. The results showed that the interaction between policy makers and implementors was very minimal, and then the socialization of scheduled programs to the targets and stakeholders carried out by the person in charge was very lacking for various reasons and the absence of full responsibility of the person in charge charge of activities in the regions, thus making coordination blocked, especially with the emergence of socio-economic differences between various stakeholders and program targets. In conclusion, the Kelurga Harapan program in Tasikmalaya City is still not effective.
Bayu Prakoso, Albertus (2016). Pola Konsumsi Penerima Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) di Desa Gebangmalang Kecamatan Mojoanyar Kabupaten Mojokerto. Surabaya :Vol 04 No 1, pp 1-8
Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (Eds.). (2016). Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Cairney, P. (2019). The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Dunn, William N, (2013), Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Cetakan Kelima. Yogyakarta : Gajah Mada University Press.
Howlett, M., & Mukherjee, I. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of Policy Process Research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Hill, M. (2017). The Public Policy Process. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
Jones, O, (1996), Pengantar Kebijakan Publik (Public Policy), Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kusnandar, Ishak, (2016), Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Bandung Cetakan Kedua: Multazam.
Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (Eds.). (2018). Theories of the Policy Process (4th ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susanto Hari. (2066). Dinamika Penanggulangan Kemiskinan. Jakarta: Khanata Pustaka LP3ES Indonesia.
Zahariadis, N. (2016). Ambiguity and Choice in Public Policy: Political Decision Making in Modern Democracies. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Jurnal
Iyos Rosyid, M. (2023). Implementasi Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) untuk Kesejahteraan Masyarakat di Kabupaten Lebak: Studi di Kecamatan Malingping, Kabupaten Lebak, Provinsi Banten. JDKP Jurnal Desentralisasi Dan Kebijakan Publik , 4(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.30656/jdkp.v4i1.6330
Abd. Rohman, Soleman Renda Bili, & Asih Widi Lestari. (2021). ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH TENTANG RELOKASI PASAR UNTUK MENINGKATKAN GOOD GOVERNANCE. Asketik: Jurnal Agama Dan Perubahan Sosial, 5(1), 96=112. https://doi.org/10.30762/asketik.v5i1.124
Peraturan
Surat Edaran dari Dirjen Pendidikan Islam No: Dj.1/PP.04/51.2014, Kementerian Agama Tentang Bantuan Program PKH
Kementrian Sosial Republik Indonesia. (2016). Pedoman Umum Program Keluarga Harapan. http://pkh-jogjaistimewa.com
Kementerian Sosial, Direktorat jaminan Sosial, Buku Kerja Pendamping Dan Operator PKH, 2015, Jakarta : Direktorat Jaminan Sosial.
