LAW AND POLITICAL CORRUPTION BY PARTY CORPORATIONS IN INDONESIA
Main Article Content
Bambang Yugo Pamungkas
Eko Wahyudi
This research aims to examine corruption crimes committed by political parties. This article discusses (1) corruption crimes committed by political parties as corporations; (2) law enforcement against corporate political parties that commit acts of corruption; and (3) the ideal concept of law enforcement on corporate corruption crimes of political parties from the perspective of prophetic law in Indonesia. The research method used is empirical legal research based on case studies. Data collection techniques were carried out through interviews, observation, field notes, and library research. Data analysis used qualitative descriptive analysis techniques and juridical analysis. The results of the study show that (1) Corruption crimes committed by political parties as corporations can be prosecuted based on four basic justifications. Even though, until now there have been no sanctions against political parties against criminal acts committed by members of political parties even though they actually fulfill the elements of criminal acts of corruption; (2) There are several types of law enforcement against corporate political parties that commit acts of corruption. If you use the provisions in Article 20 of the Corruption Law jo. Amended Corruption Law, the form of sanction against political parties is only a fine with a maximum penalty plus 1/3 (one third). However, if you use the provisions in Article 7 of the TPPU Law, the form of sanctions can be in the form of fines; announcement of the judge's decision; suspension of part or all of political party business activities; revocation of political party operational permits; dissolution and/or banning of political parties; confiscation of political party assets for the state, and/or taking political parties by the state; and (3) The ideal concept of law enforcement for political party corporate corruption crimes from the perspective of prophetic law in Indonesia is based on a comparative study between the United States criminal law system and the Dutch criminal law system regarding the concept of corporate/organizational punishment. In addition, it also promotes prophetic values for the prevention of corruption.
REFERENCES
Ant. “Pukat: Seluruh Parpol Terlibat Kasus Korupsi.” hukumonline.com, 2014. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pukat--seluruh-parpol-terlibat-kasus-korupsi-lt5329627e98607/.
Arsyi, Arsyi. “Modernisasi Partai Politik di Era 4.0.” Al-Ijtima`i: International Journal of Government and Social Science 8, no. 1 (Oktober 2022): 81–92. https://doi.org/10.22373/jai.v8i1.2116.
Disemadi, Hari Sutra, dan Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya. “Perkembangan Pengaturan Korporasi Sebagai Subjek Hukum Pidana di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti 3, no. 2 (27 Februari 2020): 118–27. https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v3i2.38.
Faisal, Faisal, dan Derita Prapti Rahayu. “Countermeasure Policy on Mining Crime under The Legal Progressive Perceptive.” Yustisia 10, no. 2 (28 Agustus 2021): 226–39. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v10i2.47189.
Fajar. “Convergence of Islam and Democracy.” Al-Bayyinah 5, no. 2 (2021): 113–28. https://doi.org/10.35673/al-bayyinah.v4i2.1721.
Fariz, Donal. “Pembatasan Hak Bagi Mantan Terpidana Korupsi Menjadi Calon Kepala Daerah.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 2 (19 Agustus 2020): 309–29. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1724.
Hariyono, Dwiki Agus, I Gede Widhiana Suarda, dan Samuel Saut Martua Samosir. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi: Analisis UU Perbankan dan Tanggungjawab Bank atas Kejahatan Karyawan.” Jurnal Anti Korupsi 3, no. 1 (2021): 80–97. https://doi.org/10.19184/jak.v3i1.27572.
Hendra, I Wayan, dan I Wayan Suardana. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Partai Politik Sebagai Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia.” Kertha Wicara: Journal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 4 (28 Juni 2019): 1–15.
Husodo, Adnan Topan. “Mengukur Partai Terkorup.” Indonesia Corruption Watch, 2014. https://antikorupsi.org/id/article/mengukur-partai-terkorup.
Jannah, Illa Miftahul, Bambang Sugiri, dan Aan Eko Widiarto. “Political Parties in Corporate Regulation as Subjects of Criminal Law.” International Journal of Social Science Research and Review 6, no. 6 (8 Juni 2023): 263–71. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v6i6.1362.
Kementerian Perancanaan Pembangunan Nasional/ Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) 2015-2019: Buku I Agenda Pembangunan Nasional. Jakarta: Kementerian Perancanaan Pembangunan Nasional/ Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, 2014.
Maharta, I Komang Giri, I Gusti Bagu Suryawan, dan Ni Made Sukaryati Karma. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Penghinaan Partai Politik.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 2, no. 2 (2021): 228–32. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.2.2.3313.228-232.
Manab, Abd., Y.A.Triana Ohoiwutun, dan Fanny Tanuwijaya. “Criminal Responsibilities Or Political Partners As Corporations In Corruption Criminal Action And Money Laundering Criminal Acts.” Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 3 (Agustus 2023): 224–49. https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v1i3.1059.
Mardiana, Mardiana, Mugeni Murdian Hasyim, Abdul Rasyid Ridha, M Reza Fahlevi, dan Muzahid Akbar Hayat. “Recadoration of Political Parties Preparation of General Elections in the Perspective of Caderization Theory.” International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources 2, no. 2 (16 Januari 2023): 111–18. https://doi.org/10.51749/injurlens.v2i2.31.
Muhtamar, Syafruddin, Muhammad Ashri, M. Arfin Hamid, dan Zulkifli Aspan. “Substantial Position of Constitution as Human Nature to the Existence of State in Modern Civilization.” Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization 82 (Februari 2019): 92–95. https://doi.org/10.7176/JLPG/82-12.
Oktaryal, Agil, dan Proborini Hastuti. “Desain Penegakan Hukum Korupsi Partai Politik di Indonesia.” Integritas 7, no. 1 (25 Juni 2021): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i1.729.
Prasetyorini, Sinto Adi. “Community Institutions with Nationalist Characteristics.” Legal Brief 11, no. 6 (28 Februari 2023): 3628–38. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i6.746.
Pratiwi, Dian Esti, Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih, R. Ginting, Subekti Subekti, dan Diana Diana Lukitasari. “Model Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Partai Politik dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia 4, no. 3 (2021): 980–89. https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v4i3.43737.
Pratiwi, Priska Sari. “Angelina Sondakh: Demokrat Terima 20 Persen dari Tiap Proyek.” CNN Indonesia, 2017. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20170830145604-12-238374/angelina-sondakh-demokrat-terima-20-persen-dari-tiap-proyek.
Purnomo, Girisusilohadi Joko, Dedi Purwana, dan Choirul Anwar. “Conceptual Problems of Political Parties Cadre Management in the Reform Era in Indonesia.” International Journal of Research and Review 10, no. 5 (23 Mei 2023): 305–22. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230538.
Sanjaya, Aditya Wiguna, I Nyoman Nurjaya, Prija Djatmika, dan Masruchin Ruba’i. “Passive Money Laundering The Implications of the Passive Money Laundering Regulation Are Formulated With the Form of Guilt Pro Parte Dolus Pro Parte Culpa.” Journal of Art and Humanities 10, no. 2 (2021): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.18533/jah.v10i2.2051.
Setiawan, Iwan. Jerat Pidana Korupsi Bagi Korporasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2017.
Simangunsong, Marthin, dan Sihol Marito Siregar. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi yang Melakukan Korupsi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa.” Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion (NJLO) 2, no. 2 (2021): 215–31.
Suarda, I Gede Widhiana, dan Muhammad Bahrul Ulum. Politik, Hukum dan HAM di Indonesia: 20 Tahun Setelah Pemerintahan Soeharto. Jember: Media Cipta Perkasa, 2019.
Suartha, I. Dewa Made, I. Dewa Agung Gede Mahardhika Martha, dan Made Dandy Pranajaya. “Innovation in Resolving Customary Sanctions in Criminal Cases in Bali.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 12, no. 3 (2020): 16–33.
Surbakti, Ramlan, dan Didik Supriyanto. Pengendalian Keuangan Partai Politik. Jakarta: Kemitraan bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan, 2011.
Susanto, Mei. “Model Alternatif Pendanaan Partai Politik.” Kajian: Menjembatani Teori dan Pesoalan Masyarakat dalam Perumusan Kebijakan 22, no. 3 (2017): 221–40.
Syahrir, Khairil Andi, M Said Karim, dan Hijrah Adhyanti Mirzana. “Pembaharuan Metode Pembuktian Subjek Hukum Korporasi sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Tumou Tou Law Review 1, no. 1 (21 September 2022): 32–47.
Transparency international. “Corruption Perceptions Index 2016.” Transparency international, 2017. https://www.transparency.org/en/news/corruption-perceptions-index-2016#table.
Wahana, Paulus. “Menguak Kebenaran Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Aplikasinya dalam Kegiatan Perkuliahan.” Jurnal Filsafat 18, no. 3 (2008): 273–94.
Wahyu, Wahyu. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Partai Politik yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana.” Arena Hukum 7, no. 2 (1 Agustus 2014): 247–69. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2014.00702.6.
Wardah, Fathiyah. “Anas Urbaningrum Divonis 8 Tahun Penjara.” VOA Indonesia, 2014. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/anas-urbaningrum-divonis-8-tahun-penjara/2461213.html.
