RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DEMOCRATIC PARENTING PATTERNS AND RELIGIOSITY WITH SELF CONTROL OF MADRASAH ALIYAH STUDENTS STATE (MAN) 1 MEDAN
DOI:
10.54443/morfai.v4i3.3770Published:
2025-08-01Downloads
Abstract
Self Control of students today are often problematic in carrying out learning. Self control is certainly influenced by many factors. This study aims to analyze and determine the relationship between democratic parenting patterns and religiosity on self control. This study is included in quantitative research that is associative causal. The sample of this study was 106 students spread across SMA MAN 1 Medan. The research data were collected using a research scale that was declared valid and reliable. The data analysis technique used multiple linear regression analysis. The results of the study showed that (1)There is a relationship between democratic parenting patterns and self-controlis 4.150 > t table 1.98 and the Sig. value is 0.000, which is < significance level 0.05, then Based on the research results, it can be concludedmeans that the level of democratic parenting patterns is high and lowhaving children can increase or decrease self-control. (2)there is a relationship between religiosity and self-control.From the results of the statistical analysis, it was found that the correlation coefficient rx2y was 0.572 with p < 0.05, thus it can be concluded that the amount of religiosity received by children will be able to increase or decrease self-control. (3)There is a relationship between democratic parenting patterns and religiosity with self-control.From the results of statistical analysis, it was found that the regression coefficient value of the Democratic Parenting Pattern variable (X1) is 0.439, which is positive. This means that Democratic Parenting Pattern (X1) has a positive effect on Self Control (Y). It is known that the t statistic or t count of Democratic Parenting Pattern (X1) is 4.150> t table 1.98 and the Sig. value is 0.000, which is <0.05 significance level. Thus, it can be concluded that democratic parenting patterns and religiosity together have an effect on self control, the contribution of both in increasing children's (students') self control is 36.8% while the remaining 63.2% can be explained by other variables outside the variables proposed in the study. Democratic Parenting Pattern (X1), Religiosity (X2) are able to influence Self Control (Y) by 36.8%, the remaining 100% - 36.8% = 63.2% is explained by other variables or factors.
Keywords:
Democratic Parenting Religiosity Self ControlReferences
Abubakar, Fauzi. 2015. “Pengaruh Komunikasi Interpersonal Antara Dosen dan Mahasiswa Terhadap Motivasi Belajar dan Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa”. Jurnal Pekommas. Vol (18) nomor 1.
Ahmad, Zulfikar Ali dan Rusdianto. 2018. The Analysis of Amil Zakat Institution/Lembaga Amil Zakat (LAZ) Accountability toward Public Satisfaction and Trust, Journal Yogyakarta
Ancok, D & Suroso, F. N. (2011). Psikologi islami. Pustaka Pelajar.
Aroma, I.S., Suminar, D.R. (2012). Hubungan antara tingkat kontrol diri dengan kecenderungan perilaku kenakalan remaja. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Perkembangan, 1(2), 1-6. Diunduh dari
Baharuddin & Mulyono. (2008). Psikologi Agama Dalam prespektif Islam. UIN Malang Press.
Baumrind, D., R.E. Larzelere and P.A. Cowan . 2002. “Ordinary physical punishment: Is it harmful? Comment on Gershoff (2002)” Psychological Bulletin, 128(4):580–589.
Baumrind, Diana. (1971). Current Pattern of Parental Authority: Development Psychology Monographs. 4, 1- 103.
Block, M. Dan Block, MF. 1996. Self Regulation and Depletion of Limited Resources: Does Self- Control Resemble a Muscle? Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 126. No.2. Hal . 247-259.
Berk, LE., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children’s learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
Casmini. (2007). Emotional Parenting. Yogyakarta: P idea.
Dariyo, Agoes. (2004). Psikologi Perkembangan Dewasa Muda. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Desmita. 2013. Psikologi Perkembangan. Bandung : PT. Remaja. Rosdakarya.
Depdiknas .2003. Undang-undang RI No.20 tahun 2003.Tentang Sistem pendidikan Nasional.
Drajat, Z. 1991. Ilmu Jiwa Agama. Jakarta : Bulan Bintang
French, D. C., Eisenberg, N., Vaughan, J., Purwono, U., & Suryanti, T. A. (2008). Religious involvement and the social competence and adjustment of Indonesian muslim adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 597– 611.
Ghufron, N.M. & Risnawita, R. (2014). Teori-teori Psikologi. Jogjakarta: Ar-. Ruzz Media.
Gunarsa, D. Dan Gunarsa, D. 2009. Psikologi Untuk Pembimbing. Jakarta: PT BPK Gunung Mulia.
Gottfredson, M.R. & Hirschi, T. 1990. A General Theory of Crime. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hurlock, Elizabeth B. 1980. Psikologi Perkembangan: Suatu Pendekatan. Sepanjang Rentang Kehidupan. Jakarta : Gramedia.
Hurlock, E.B. 1999. Psikologi Perkembangan: Suatu Pendekatan Sepanjang Rentang Kehidupan. Alih bahasa: Istiwidayati & Soedjarwo. Edisi Kelima. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Lestari, Sri. (2012). Psikologi Keluarga: Penanaman Nilai dan Penanganan Konflik Dalam Keluarga. Jakarta: Kencana.
Mastiyah, I. (2018). Religiusitas siswa madrasah aliyah dan sekolah menengah atas. Edukasi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama Dan Keagamaan, 16(3), 232–246.
Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-Regulation and Depletion of Limited Resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle?. New York: Psychological Bulletin.
Nashori, Fuad dan Rachmy Diana Mucharam. 2002. Mengembangkan Kreativitas dalam Perspektif Psikologi Islam. Jogyakarta: Menara Kudus.
Nurmasyithah Syamaun. 2012. Dampak Pola Asuh Orangtua & Guru terhadap Kecenderungan Perilaku Agresif Siswa. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Santrock, John W, 2007. Psikologi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Kencana.
Santrock (2003) John W. Adolescence. Perkembangan Remaja. Edisi Keenam. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Sarwono, Sarlito W. (2012). Psikologi Remaja. Jakarta : PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Sriyanti, L. (2013). Psikologi Belajar. Yogyakarta: Ombak
Smith, C. (2003). Theorizing religious effects among American adolescents. The Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42(1), 17-30.
Sutoyo, T.,dkk. 2009. “ Teori Pengolahan Citra Digital”. Yogyakarta : Penerbit Andi Offset
Syamaun, Nurmasyitha. (2019). Dampak Pola Asuh Orang Tua Dan Guru Terhadap Kecerdasan Perilaku Agresif Siswa. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Thalib, Gustin. 2013. Identifikasi Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kepatuhan Subjek Pajak dalam Melakukan Pembayaran Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan di Kecamatan Kota Timur. Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. Kim. Ung.ac.id, diakses tanggal 4 maret 2014
Utami, A.F dan Sumaryono. (2008). Pembelian Impulsif Ditinjau dari Kontrol Diri dan Jenis Kelamin pada Remaja. Jurnal Psikologi Proyeksi. 1 (3), 46-57.
Panuju, P., Umami, I. 2005. Psikologi Remaja. Tiara Wacana : Yogyakarta
Permono, H. B., Sutaryo, Ugrasena, I., Windiastuti, E., & Abdulsalam, M. (2006). Buku Ajar Hematologi- Onkologi Anak. Ikatan Dokter Anak Indonesia, 236– 247.
Worthington, E.L. 2003. Forgiving and Reconciling: Bridges to Wholeness and Hope. Illinois: InterVarsity
Widiyanta, Ari. 2005. Sikap Terhadap Lingkungan Dan Religiusitas. Psikologia Volume I, No. 2, Desember 2005
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ridha Rahma Nisa Hasibuan, Hasanuddin, Yudistira Fauzy Indrawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
