RESTORATION OF THE LEGAL STATUS OF LAND CERTIFICATES DUE TO THE PPAT'S NEGLIGENCE IN APPLYING THE PRINCIPLE OF PRUDENCE
DOI:
10.54443/morfai.v5i5.4378Published:
2025-11-15Downloads
Abstract
This study examines the mechanism for restoring the legal status of land certificates that are legally flawed due to the negligence of Land Deed Officials (PPAT) in applying the principle of prudence in carrying out their duties. The urgency of this research is based on the increasing number of land disputes triggered by the lack of careful verification by PPATs, resulting in legally flawed deeds and certificates. This study uses a normative legal method by applying a statute approach and a case approach, focusing on an analysis of the Tangerang District Court Decision Number 1401/Pdt.G/2021/PN Tng as the object of study that has obtained permanent legal force. The results show that the PPAT's negligence in verifying the identity of the parties and the authenticity of the documents resulted in the creation of fictitious Sale and Purchase Deeds (AJB), which have implications for the unlawful transfer of rights. This negligence not only affects the validity of the deed but also invalidates the legal status of land certificates issued based on the legally flawed deed. The process of restoring the legal status of land certificates is carried out through the implementation of court decisions that have permanent legal force, accompanied by administrative steps by the National Land Agency (BPN) in accordance with the provisions of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration and Regulation of the Minister of ATR/BPN Number 21 of 2020 concerning Handling and Settlement of Land Cases. The novelty of this research lies in the in-depth analysis of the synergy between judicial and administrative authorities in the process of restoring the legal status of land certificates damaged due to negligence of PPAT. This research emphasizes the urgency of implementing the principle of prudence by PPAT as an important instrument in ensuring legal certainty and preventing the emergence of land disputes in the future.
Keywords:
Administrative Law Legal Certainty PPAT Negligence Precautionary Principle Land DisputesReferences
Journals:
Azwardi. (2022). Prinsip Kehati-Hatian dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik oleh Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT). Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 6(3), 6430–6440.
Baharudin. (2014). Kewenangan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (Ppat) Dalam Proses Jual Beli Tanah. Jurnal Keadilan Progresif, 5(1), 151. http://jurnal.ubl.ac.id/index.php/KP/article/view/441
Darwin, M., & Hamid, A. (2024). PENERAPAN PRINSIP KEHATI-HATIAN DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA JUAL BELI OLEH PEJABAT PEMBUAT AKTA TANAH (PPAT) BERDASARKAN FAKTA MATERIIL (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR : 248/PID.B/2022/PN JKT BRT). Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(4), 1–43.
Djafar, W. (2016). Menegaskan Kembali Komitmen Negara Hukum: Sebuah Catatan Atas Kecenderungan Defisit Negara Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(5), 151. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk757
Isnaini, H., & Wanda, H. D. (2017). Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Peralihan Tanah Yang Belum Bersertifikat. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 24(3), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss3.art7
Jehubyanan, G. A., Sialana, F., & Hatala, R. (2022). Implementation of Amoi Marriage Custom in Marriage Procedures in Rumahkay Village. IJRAEL: International Journal of Religion Education and Law, 1(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.57235/ijrael.v1i1.62
Kurniaji, D. F. (2017). Pendaftaran Hak Atas Tanah Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan. FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(3), 433–456. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no3.786
Tarfi, A., & Amri, I. (2021). Reforma Agraria sebagai Jalan menuju Perdamaian yang Berkelanjutan di Aceh. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 7(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.31292/bhumi.v7i2.509
Wibhawa, F. R., & Dewi, A. A. I. A. A. (2022). Kekuatan Pembuktian Sertifikat Hak Milik atas Tanah sebagai Alat Bukti Kepemilikan yang Sah. Acta Comitas, 7(1), 94–103.
Books:
Arba, H. . (2018). Hukum Agraria Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Ali, A. (2008). Menguak Tabir Hukum. Ghalia Indonesia.
Limbong, B. (2012). Hukum Agraria Nasional. Margaretha Pustaka.
Mulyadi, L. (2009). Putusan Hakim Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata (Teori, Praktik, teknik membuat dan permasalahannya. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Regulation:
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah
Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pengelolaan Pengkajian Dan Penanganan Kasus Pertanahan
Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2020 tentang Penanganan dan Penyelesaian Kasus Pertanahan
Putusan Perdata Pengadilan Negeri Tanggerang Nomor 1401/Pdt.G/2021/PN Tangerang
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maulia Sakinah, Jamal Wiwoho, Adriana Grahani Firdausy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
