LEGAL POSITION OF THE INDONESIAN NOTARY PUBLIC ASSOCIATION AS A LEGAL ENTITY AFTER THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ARTICLE 82 OF THE UUJN JO. PERMENKUMHAM NO. 24 OF 2025
DOI:
10.5281/zenodo.18599736Published:
2025-12-25Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to determine and analyze the legal status of the Indonesian Notary Association (INI) as a Notary Professional Organization after the enactment of Article 82 of the Notary Law (UUJN) in conjunction with the Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 24 of 2025, which has caused polemics among legal experts regarding INI before and after the enactment of these regulations. This study is based on the situation of changes in the substantive legislation of the Notary Organization and will have implications for the enforcement of the code of ethics regarding changes and shifts in the legal status of INI as an organization. This study uses a normative legal research method in the form of a statute approach, and legal explanations (doctrine), as well as scientific information or literature and descriptive qualitative analysis of the law, especially primary, secondary, and tertiary laws, to determine the boundaries and potential of existing organizations, as well as normative legal consequences. The results of this study indicate that legally INI is a Legal Entity Association recognized as an association or association, namely as Staatsblad 1870 Number 64. Although the state will provide legitimacy and certain functions of authority are not attributable to public power, this shows that INI has not changed its status to a State Organ. However, the development of these regulations has caused INI's position to become a combination because it has a coaching and supervisory role related to state authority through the Notary Supervisory Board. This study concludes that INI remains an organization that does not receive public accountability, so there is a need for strengthening the limits of authority and harmonization between notary organizations and the government to avoid overlapping supervision and ensure legal certainty in the implementation of notary positions.
Keywords:
Indonesian Notary Association Organization UUJN Legal StatusReferences
Achmad, Helmy, dan Biner Sihotang. Optimalisasi Peran Ikatan Notaris Indonesia dalam Perlindungan Hukum bagi Notaris. 3 (2025).
Adjie, Habib. Kompilasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Jabatan Notaris. Pustaka Zaman, 2012.
Alexandros, Nicholas, dan Amad Sudiro. “Status Hukum dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris dan PPAT Terhadap Akta yang Dibuatnya.” Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 8, no. 6 (2023): 4476–91. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i6.12659.
Alkatiri, Nadhif M. PERBANDINGAN TUGAS DAN WEWENANG NOTARIS INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT. t.t.
Anand, Ghansham. Karakteristik Jabatan Notaris di Indonesia. 1 ed. PRENADAMEDIA GROUP, 2018.
Faisal Makna, Muhammad. “Kedudukan Ikatan Notaris Indonesia sebagai Organisasi Profesi untuk Profesi Notaris di Indonesia.” El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat 4, no. 6 (2024). https://doi.org/10.47467/elmujtama.v4i6.4573.
Fatriansyah, Fatriansyah. “Peran Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris Dan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Terhadap Pembinaan dan Pengawasan Notaris Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris.” Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum 14, no. 2 (2023): 291. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v14i2.370.
I Gusti Putu Arya Lanang Karyasa dan Putu Edgar Tanaya. “TINJAUAN HUKUM TERHADAP KEWAJIBAN CUTI NOTARIS YANG TERPILIH SEBAGAI KEPALA DAERAH.” Acta Comitas 10, no. 02 (2025): 419–35. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2025.v10.i02.p13.
Kustiyah, Sri, dan Hasrul Hasrul. “Politik Hukum Pemberian Kewenangan Kepada Notaris Untuk Membuat Akta Pertanahan Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Kewenangan PPAT.” Jurnal Akta 5, no. 1 (2018): 309. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i1.2663.
Latifa, Shintia, Khairani, dan Syofirman Syofyan. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Yang Melanggar Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (Studi Kasus Dikota Padang).” Unes Journal of Swara Justisia 9, no. 1 (2025): 93–106. https://doi.org/10.31933/5s2e4b11.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Group, 2007.
Maulidi, M Fariz. “KEWENANGAN ORGANISASI NOTARIS TERHADAP NOTARIS YANGMELANGGAR KODE ETIK NOTARIS DALAM MENJALANKAN PROFESI.” Sriwijaya, 2020.
Mulia, Jingga, Elita Rahmi, dan Eko Nuriyatman. “PROTOKOL NOTARIS SEBAGAI ARSIP VITAL NEGARA DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA.” Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law 3, no. 3 (2022): 223–41. https://doi.org/10.22437/mendapo.v3i3.18903.
PERATURAN MENTERI HUKUM REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 24 TAHUN 2025 TENTANG PENETAPAN, PEMBINAAN, DAN PENGAWASAN ORGANISASI NOTARIS (2025).
Revano, Aditya. KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH PERKUMPULAN DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERKUMPULAN IKATAN NOTARIS INDONESIA (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi DKI Jakarta Nomor 752/PDT/2018/PT.DKI). t.t.
Rienda Cintya Dewi, Ida Ayu Kade. “Keanggotaan Notaris Dalam Organisasi Ikatan Notaris Indonesia: Mandatory Vs Voluntary.” Acta Comitas 3, no. 2 (2018): 269. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2018.v03.i02.p04.
Sesung, Rusdianto, Fayakundia Putra Sufi, Roosalina Kartini, dan Jeffry Tanugraha. Hukum Dan Politik Hukum Jabatan Notaris. R.A.De.Rozarie, 2017.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Penelitian Hukum Normatif : Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. 17 ed. Rajawali Pres, 2015.
Soenaryo, Cipto. Kewenangan dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris dalam Konteks Pelayanan Hukum di Indonesia. USU Press, 2023.
Staatsblad 1870 Nomor 64.
Sukawati, Maheswara Perbawa. “Kedudukan International Union of Notaries sebagai Organisasi Internasional dalam Transaksi Bisnis Internasional.” Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sains dan Humaniora 6, no. 1 (2022): 74–79. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppsh.v6i1.45488.
UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG PERUBAHAN ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG JABATAN NOTARIS (2014).
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bimo Pangestu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
