PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOCUSED ON STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT IN PERTAMINA’S BOYOLALI–PENGAPON PIPELINE PROJECT
DOI:
10.5281/zenodo.18459845Published:
2026-01-28Downloads
Abstract
The Boyolali–Pengapon pipeline project is a national‐priority infrastructure initiative by PT Pertamina Patra Niaga. The project that seeks to improve Central Java’s fuel distribution faces stakeholder challenges that are intricate. From securing government approval, acquiring land, and managing relationship with the local communities, an effective stakeholder engagement framework is crucial to ensure the project stays on its schedule and budget. In accordance to that, this study analyzes the application of Pertamina’s stakeholder engagement in the Boyolali-Pengapon pipeline project. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with Pertamina project managers, government regulators, local community representatives, and the pipeline’s engineering partner, supplemented by analysis of project documents and reports. Thematic analysis was conducted using stakeholder mapping tools (the Stakeholder Salience Model and Power–Interest Grid) in line with PMI’s stakeholder engagement processes. The study’s objectives are to identify the project’s key stakeholders and their interests, assess the engagement practices used, document stakeholder-related issues, and evaluate how the stakeholder management approach affected the project’s schedule, cost, and community acceptance. The research finds suggest managing stakeholder proactively benefited the project result significant. Major delays were prevented through early engagement. Challenges of land acquisition and permit were also present, yet were not a hindrance for the project as they were addressed through negotiation and collaboration with local authorities. Consequently, the disruption avoided from legal disputes that might be costly and the small investments made in engagement helps the project to stay on budget. All in all, the case shows that large infrastucture projects needs a formal stakeholder engagement process to schedule compliance, keep cost controlled, and gain support from the local community.
Keywords:
Stakeholder Management Project Management Infrastructure Project Community Engagement Land AcquisitionReferences
Asiedu, R. O., & Alfen, H. W. (2016). Understanding the Effects of Project Complexity on Schedule Performance: A Stakeholder Perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 23(4), 51–70. https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/journal/ecam
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). London : SAGE Publications Ltd.
Dini, Y. I. F., Harun, F. M., Natalia, P., & Joecy, V. (2024). Laporan Analisa Manajemen Proyek pada Proyek Usaha “NetShell.” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(4), 16111–16122. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i4.12484
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Jalaludin, I. S., & Sari, A. P. (2023). Komitmen PGN untuk Negeri: Perkuat Ketahanan Energi di Jateng, PGN Solution-Pertamina Patra Niaga Bangun Pipa Minyak Pengapon-Boyolali. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2023/10/12/19484801/perkuat-ketahanan-energi-di-jateng-pgn-solution-pertamina-patra-niaga-bangun?page=all
Mejía, G., Sánchez, O., Castañeda, K., & Pellicer, E. (2023). Stakeholders’ Issues as a Source of Project Delays: A Meta-Analysis Between Building and Road Projects. Revista de La Construcción, 22(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.7764/rdlc.22.1.51
Mendelow, A. (1991). Stakeholder Mapping. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Systems, Cambridge, MA.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247
Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., & Yang, J. (2015). Stakeholder Management Studies in Mega Construction Projects: A Review and Future Directions. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 446–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.007
Muchsin, H. (2025). Cijago: Lintasan Historis Pembangunan Jalan Tol Cinere-Jagorawi. Jakarta : Penerbit Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Olander, S., & Landin, A. (2005). Evaluation of Stakeholder Influence in the Implementation of Construction Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 22(4), 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.02.002
PMI. (2021). The Standard for Project management and A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (7th ed.). Pennsylvania : Project Management Institute Inc. https://tegnum.edu.pe/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Project-Management-Institute-A-Guide-to-the-Project-Management-Body-of-Knowledge-PMBOK-R-Guide-PMBOK®️-Guide-Project-Management-Institute-2021.pdf
Rambe, K. F., & Wijaya, C. (2025). Keterampilan Komunikasi Interpersonal Kepala Sekolah Dalam Menyelesaikan Konflik Di SMA Swasta Budysatrya Medan. Research and Development Journal Of Education, 11(1), 551 – 560. https://doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v11i1.28867
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Iwan Setiawan, Gatot Yudoko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




