LEGAL REVIEW OF COMBAT MEDIC SERVICES IN HANDLING GUNSHOT WOUNDS OF BRIMOB PERSONNEL IN OPERATIONAL DUTIES IN PAPUA
Published:
2026-05-16Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to analyze combat medic services in handling gunshot wounds sustained by Brimob personnel during operations in Papua, with a focus on the legal basis, operational effectiveness, and challenges encountered. The research employs a normative juridical method with a document study approach and analysis of legislation, including Law No. 17 of 2023, Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024, Police Chief Regulations (Perkap), Police Regulations (Perpol), as well as the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) and Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) protocols implemented in Brimob units. The results indicate that combat medic services have a strong legal foundation and clear technical standards; however, their effectiveness is influenced by multidimensional obstacles such as geographical conditions, logistical limitations, personnel competency, and the absence of comprehensive regulations regarding tactical medical authority. This study recommends improving internal regulations, enhancing tactical-medical training capacity, strengthening logistics, and conducting regular legal evaluations to ensure patient rights are fulfilled, service effectiveness is increased, and legal risks for personnel are minimized.
Keywords:
combat medic gunshot wounds Brimob Papua health lawReferences
1. Wardhana AP. Trauma management in pre-hospital emergencies. Jakarta: Prenada Media; 2023.
2. Indonesia R. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health. Jakarta: State Secretariat; 2023.
3. Utami D. State obligations in the fulfillment of health services according to Law Number 17 of 2023. J Health and Huk. 2024; 8(2):101–18.
4. Suryanto B. Analysis of the implementation of Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024 in the implementation of emergency health services in Indonesia. J Health Policy. 2024; 9(1):12–25.
5. Indonesia KKR. Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 47 of 2018 concerning Emergency Services. 2018.
6. Hidayat M. Implementation of regulations on the use of force and medical assistance in the police environment. J Huk and Security. 2022; 14(2):155–70.
7. Rohman F. Juridical review of the role of the Brimob Police Corps in handling conflicts in Papua. J Huk Bahasa Indonesia. 2024; 6(1):45–62.
8. Organization WH. Emergency care systems for universal health coverage: Ensuring timely care for all. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.
9. Cassiola R. Emergency care and public health systems: Strategies for trauma and disaster response. Springer; 2021.
10. Gerhardt RT, Smith R, Johnson D. Tactical medicine and combat casualty care in modern operations. Emerg Care Prehospital. 2011; 15(4):512–20.
11. Mabry RL, Holcomb JB. Causes of death in U.S. Special Operations Forces in the Global War on Terrorism. Ann Surg. 2007; 245(6):986–91.
12. Coupland RM. Health care in armed conflicts: Legal and operational perspectives. Int Rev Red Cross. 2005; 87(858):23–46.
13. Beekley AC. Tactical Combat Casualty Care: Lessons from the battlefield. Mil Med. 2011; 176(4):345–52.
14. Kotwal Hospital. Tactical combat casualty care and lessons learned from the battlefield. Mil Med. 2016; 181(6):508–14.
15. Butler FK. Tactical Combat Casualty Care: Principles and practice. Washington, DC: U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research; 2017.
16. Holcomb JB. Combat casualty care: Lessons learned from military operations. In: Advances in trauma care. Springer; 2015. pp. 123–45.
17. Pattison G. Legal challenges in emergency medical response in conflict zones. Int J Law Heal. 2016; 32(1):45–62.
18. McManus JG, Eastridge BJ. Prehospital care in combat environments: Evidence and practice. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020; 88(3):440–8.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 His Majesty Zulfikar, Muhammad Arif Sahlepi, Marice Simamarta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
