LEGAL PROTECTION AGAINST USE RIGHTS TO COUNTERFEIT REGISTERED TRADEMARKS
Main Article Content
Adil Dwi Laksono
Satino
This study analyzes legal protection against the use of counterfeit trademark rights based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. Using a normative legal research method with a doctrinal juridical approach, the study analyzes primary and secondary legal materials related to trademark protection. The study results indicate that the legal protection framework includes preventive aspects through the trademark registration system and repressive aspects through civil lawsuit mechanisms, criminal sanctions, and alternative dispute resolution. Registered trademark owners are protected by exclusive rights that prevent the use of the trademark by other parties without permission, with criminal sanctions of up to 10 years in prison and a fine of IDR 5 billion for violators. Although the regulation is comprehensive, its implementation still faces significant challenges, especially related to the characteristics of complaint offenses that require reports from trademark owners as a prerequisite for law enforcement. Data on Indonesia's economic losses due to trademark counterfeiting, reaching IDR 291 trillion in 2020, indicates that the effectiveness of law enforcement is not yet optimal. The main challenges include the low legal awareness of business actors in registering trademarks, the complexity of proving violations in the digital realm, and the limited capacity of law enforcement officers to deal with increasingly sophisticated counterfeiting methods. This study concludes that a holistic strategy is needed to increase the effectiveness of brand protection, including intensive socialization, reform of complaint offense policies, simplification of registration procedures, strengthening of investigative capacity, and development of technology for early detection of violations.
Abdulkadir, M. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Ananto, R. W., Amalia, E., & Utama, M. W. (2022). Politik Hukum Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, 9(4), 1605–1616. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v10i5.35805
Ardians. (2020). Upaya Hukum Terhadap Badan Atau Perorangan Yang Menggunakan Merek Yang Telah Terdaftar. Ardiansnco.Co.Id. https://ardiansnco.co.id/upaya-hukum-terhadap-badan-atau-perorangan-yang-menggunakan-merek-yang-telah-terdaftar/
DJKI. (2023a). Mediasi Pelanggaran Hak Cipta Buku PPKC Berujung Damai. Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual - Kementerian Hukum R.I. https://www.dgip.go.id/artikel/detail-artikel-berita/mediasi-pelanggaran-hak-cipta-buku-ppkc-berujung-damai?kategori=Berita+Resmi+Indikasi+Geografis
DJKI. (2023b). Sepakat Berdamai, DJKI Berhasil Memediasi Sengketa Merek Longchamp. Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual - Kementerian Hukum R.I. https://www.dgip.go.id/artikel/detail-artikel-berita/sepakat-berdamai-djki-berhasil-memediasi-sengketa-merek-longchamp?kategori=Berita+Resmi+Indikasi+Geografis
Hans, C., & Kansil, C. S. T. (2023). Analisis Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penggunaan Merek pada Kelas Barang dan Jasa yang Sama. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 4163–4171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2
Heriani, F. N. (2021). Tips untuk Pelaku Usaha Saat Menangani Pelanggaran Merek. Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/tips-untuk-pelaku-usaha-saat-menangani-pelanggaran-merek-lt61337d7c5a7f6/
Heriani, F. N. (2022). Minimalisir Kendala Penyelesaian Perkara, PPNS DJKI Koordiinasi Bersama Bareskrim Polri. Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/minimalisir-kendala-penyelesaian-perkara--ppns-djki-koordiinasi-bersama-bareskrim-polri-lt62f78f58a7280/
Ibrahim, J. (2017). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Banyumedia Publishing.
Irawati, N., & Santoso, B. (2024). Pelanggaran Hak Atas Merek dan Upaya Penyelesaiannya (Studi Putusan No. 2/Pdt. Sus-HKI/Merek/2022/PN. Niaga. Sby). Notarius, 17(3), 2020–2037. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v17i3.53253
Jotyka, G., & Ketut Riski Suputra, I. G. (2021). Prosedur Pendaftaran Dan Pengalihan Merek Serta Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2001. Ganesha Law Review, 3(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.23887/glr.v3i2.447
Kurniawan, E. (2023a). Ikhtiar Memperjuangkan Hak Cipta. Kompas.Id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/humaniora/2023/06/22/memperjuangkan-hak-cipta
Kurniawan, E. (2023b). Polisi Tangkap Penjual Suplemen Palsu di Jakarta. Kompas.Id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/metro/2023/06/01/obat-palsu-dan-pidana-pemulih-kekayaan-intelektual
Muslimawati, N. (2022). Peredaran Barang Palsu Rugikan Ekonomi RI hingga Rp 291 T. Kumparan.Com. https://kumparan.com/kumparanbisnis/peredaran-barang-palsu-rugikan-ekonomi-ri-hingga-rp-291-t-1xcn3xMbnX1
Puspita, Y. B. (2023). Ganti Rugi Atas Penggunaan Merek Yang Memiliki Persamaan Pada Pokoknya. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 3(3), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v3i3.295
Ratna, R., Safiranita, T., & Utama, B. (2021). Pelanggaran Merek di Indonesia. Revika Aditama.
Rezki, D., & Astarini, S. (2021). Penghapusan Merek Terdaftar: Berdasarkan UU No. 15 tahun 2001 tentang merek dan UU No. 20 tahun 2016 tentang merek dan indikasi geografis jo. Perubahan UU No. 11 tahun 2020 tentang cipta kerja di hubungkan dengan TRIPs-WTO. Penerbit Alumni.
Rishadi, A. A. (2025). Tantangan Membasmi Pelanggaran Kekayaan Intelektual di Era Digital. Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual - Kementerian Hukum R.I. https://www.dgip.go.id/artikel/detail-artikel-berita/tantangan-membasmi-pelanggaran-kekayaan-intelektual-di-era-digital?kategori=
Tommy, P. (2017). Pelindungan Merek. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Wiraguna, S. A. (2024). Metode Normatif dan Empiris dalam Penelitian Hukum: Studi Eksploratif di Indonesia. Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan Dan Hukum, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.59818/jps.v3i3.1390
