LEGAL STUDY OF DEFENSE STRATEGIES IN CRIMINAL CASES BASED ON ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE

Authors

Muhammad Rusdi , Sunardi Purwanda , Muhammad Sabir Rahman , Bakhtiar Tijjang , Aksah Kasim

DOI:

10.5281/zenodo.20482579

Published:

2026-06-01

Downloads

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the legal qualifications in the Criminal Procedure Code and the ITE Law regarding electronic evidence in criminal cases in Indonesia and effective defense strategies in facing electronic evidence-based criminal cases by adapting to the new criminal law system. This study uses a Normative research type with a Legislative Approach and a Conceptual Approach. The types of legal material sources use Primary legal materials, Secondary legal materials and Tertiary legal materials. Legal analysis will be studied in a qualitative prescriptive manner. The results of this study are the legal qualifications in the Criminal Procedure Code and the ITE Law regarding electronic evidence in criminal cases in Indonesia, namely the Legal Qualification of Electronic Evidence based on Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, namely formally recognized as evidence, obtained legally and authentically (original and not changed/manipulated) and materially related to the crime and the identity of the perpetrator. While the legal qualifications according to the 2024 ITE Law are Valid as evidence, Obtained legally. and Obtained from a secure and tested electronic system, Electronic evidence must be original (authentic), unchanged (integrity) and trustworthy (reliability) and Must be related to the case and Effective defense strategies in facing electronic evidence-based criminal case evidence by adapting to the new criminal law system, namely Delegitimization of electronic evidence, Reclassification of evidence, Testimonium de Auditu Digital attacks, Analysis of evidence linkages, psychological attacks and suggestions and Alternative narratives.

Keywords:

Strategy Defense Electronic Evidence Criminal Cases

References

Agus Wibowo. (2026). PembaruaN KUHP dan KUHAP sebagai Rekonstruksi Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia. Semarang: Prima Agus Teknik.

Ariana, I. N. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik Berdasarkan Putusan Mk Nomor 20/Puu-Xiv/2016. UNES Law Review, 5(1), 1-19.

Budiyanto. (2025). Pengantar Cybercrime dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Serang: Sada Kurnia Pustaka.

Budiyanto. (2025). Pengantar Cybercrime dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Serang: Sada Kurnia Pustaka.

Elvi Susanti Syam. (2024). Hukum Acara Pidana. Makassar: De La. Macca.

Helmawansyah, M. (2021). Penggunaan barang bukti elektronik yang dijadikan alat bukti dalam perkara pidana. Journal of Law (Jurnal Ilmu Hukum), 7(2), 527-541.

Isima, N. (2022). Kedudukan alat bukti elektronik dalam pembuktian perkara pidana. Gorontalo Law Review, 5(1), 179-189.

Juliardi, B., Runtunuwu, Y. B., Musthofa, M. H., TL, A. D., Asriyani, A., Hazmi, R. M., ... & Samara, M. R. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Padang: Gita Lentera.

Pahlawan, S. A. T. (2025). Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 6(3), 708-719.

Rafika Nur, Amriyanto, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar, Sunardi Purwanda. (2023). Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Gorontalo: Cahaya Arsh Publisher & Printing.

Rasiwan, I. (2026). Pembuktian Terbuka KUHAP Baru. AMU Press, 1-260.

Setyadi, H. B., & Utari, I. S. (2025). Relevansi Yuridis Dan Sosiologis Testimonium De Auditu Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual. Bookchapter Hukum dan Lingkung

an, 1, 724-773.

Purwanda, S., Ambarwati, A., Darmawati, D., & Prayudi, P. (2024). Haluan kesejahteraan sosial dalam diskursus teori-teori keadilan. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 25(1), 152–161.

Susilo, E. (2026). Meneropong Kepastian Penetapan Status Tersangka Dalam Kuhap Baru. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 18(1), 206-225.

Syarif, M., Ramadhani, R., Graha, M. A. W., Yanuaria, T., Muhtar, M. H., Asmah, N., Syahril, M. A.F., ... & Jannah, M. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Padang: Get Press Indonesia.

Tokan, B. (2025). Cross-Examination Sebagai Metode Untuk Memverifikasi Kebenaran Keterangan Saksi. Lex Mandiri, 1(01), 34-45.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Putusan Nomor 61/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Parepare.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Rusdi, Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada/ Parepare

Author Origin : Indonesia

Sunardi Purwanda, Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada/ Parepare

Author Origin : Indonesia

Muhammad Sabir Rahman, Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada/ Parepare

Author Origin : Indonesia

Bakhtiar Tijjang, Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada/ Parepare

Author Origin : Indonesia

Aksah Kasim, Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Bisnis Andi Sapada/ Parepare

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Muhammad Rusdi, Sunardi Purwanda, Muhammad Sabir Rahman, Bakhtiar Tijjang, & Aksah Kasim. (2026). LEGAL STUDY OF DEFENSE STRATEGIES IN CRIMINAL CASES BASED ON ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE. Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI), 6(4), 5828–5835. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20482579

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.