THE PROTECTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS THROUGH THE PRACTICE OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
Main Article Content
Hikam Hulwanullah
According to the democracy index, Indonesia is a flawed democracy, meaning that, as the state's organ of governance, the government is still insufficiently powerful to effectively defend the fundamental rights of its people. One of the causes of this is the inadequate legal system and protection of citizens' fundamental rights from the state, which is essentially achieved through the practice of judicial activism at the Constitutional Court. This study utilizes normative research to examine written regulations' norms to provide findings about the pressing need to address the practice of judicial activism at the Constitutional Court. This study utilized three distinct sorts of approaches: the statute approach, the conceptual approach, and the comparative approach. Moreover, relevant primary, secondary, and tertiary legal documents serve as the foundation for this study. After gathering this legal data through a review of the literature, qualitative descriptive and comparative descriptive analytic methodologies were used for analysis. The author found that judicial activism is one of the steps that judges can take to make efforts to protect the constitutional rights of citizens in the constitutional court.
Achmad, M. F. N. dan Y. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Pustaka Pelajar.
Anjarsari, L. (2017). YLBHI: SKB 3 Menteri Terhadap Ahmadiyah Langgar Hak Warga Negara. Mahkamah Konstitusi. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=14107
Arliman, L. (2017). Komnas Ham Sebagai State Auxialiary Bodies Di Dalam Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 2(1), 57.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2005). Model-Model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara. Konstitusi Press.
Ayuni, Q. (2010). Menggagas Constitutional Complaint di Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31739-7_107-1
Basu, D. Das. (2003). Human Right in Constitutional Law. Wadhaw and Company.
Craig, J. et al. (2008). Law and Rights: Common Law.
Craig, P. P. (2009). Formalism and Pragmatism in the House of Lords. Cambridge Law Journal, 68(1), 32–35.
Daniel, N. (2017). Urgenda VS The Dutch State The Case For Ethical Judicial Activism. University Utrecht.
Data Pengaduan HAM 2022. (2022). Direktur Jenderal HAM. https://ham.go.id/pusat-data/data-pengaduan-ham/2022-2/
Democracy Index 2022: Frontline Democracy and the Battle For Ukraine. (2022).
Diantha, I. M. P. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Prenada Media Grup.
Effendy, M. (2005). Kejaksaan RI: Posisi dan Fungsinya Dari Perspektif Hukum. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Galligan, B. (1991). Judicial Activism in Australia. In Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective (p. 70). Macmillan.
Garner, B. A. (2009). Black’s Law Dictionary. Thomson Reuters.
Guyanie, G. El. (2013). Urgensi Pengujian Constitutional Complaint Indonesia. Jurnal Agama Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 3(1), 185.
Hamzah, G. (2022). JAMINAN HAK KONSTITUSIONAL WARGA NEGARA DAN HUKUM ACARA MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI. PUSAT PENDIDIKAN PANCASILA DAN KONSTITUSI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI RI.
Heydon, D. (2003). How Judicial Activism Results In The Death Of The Rule Of Law In Australia. https://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=269
Hirschl, R. (2004). Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Harvard University Press.
Holland, P. (2005). Judicial Activism: The Limits of Principle. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 25(2), 349–370.
Judicial Activism in Australia. (2022). https://ivypanda.com/essays/judicial-activism-in-australia/
Kmiec, K. D. (2004). The Origin and Current Meanings of Judicial Activism (p. 1446).
Kuffal, H. M. A. (2003). Penerapan KUHAP Dalam Praktik Hukum. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
Lailiyah, K. (2016). Constitutional Complaint Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. 1–23.
Mamudji, S. S. dan S. (2003). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenda Media.
Masyitoh, A. (2021). Role Of Judicial Activism In Environmental Dispute Resolution Before The State Administrative Court. Prophetic Law, 3(1), 1–15.
Miranda dan Hananto Widodo, V. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pembubaran Organisasi Masyarakat Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI). 00(4), 1–6.
Neuberger, Lord. (2018). Judicial Power and the Balance of Our Constitution. Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law.
Ningrum, D. R. (2009). Kedudukan Surat Keputusan Bersama (SKB) Menteri Agama, Jaksa Agung, dan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Tentang Peringatan dan Perintah Kepada Jemaat Ahmadiyah Indonesia (JAI) Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2004. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Palguna, I. D. G. (2013). Pengaduan Konstitusional: Upaya Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak-Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. Sinar Grafika.
Panduan Dalam Memasyarakatkan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (pp. 9–10). (2003). Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat Republik Indonesia.
Refleksi Penegakan dan Pemajuan HAM di Indonesia Tahun 2022. (2022). In Keterangan Pers Nomor 046/HM.00/XII/2022 (p. 5). Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia.
Rizaty, M. A. (2022). Indeks Demokrasi Dunia 2021, Indonesia Masih Dinilai Lemah. Databoks. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/02/14/indeks-demokrasi-dunia-2021-indonesia-masih-dinilai-lemah
Sakti, Y. (2014). Peninjauan Kembali Oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum: Antara Kepastian Dan Keadilan. Arena Hukum, 7(1), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2014.00701.5
Saragih, A. (2019). Ombudsman dan Pengawasan Pelayanan Publik. https://www.ombudsman.go.id/file_service/lihatx/anno/fanno_5cbff5ce11657_1556084174.pdf/
Schütze, R. (2015). European Constitutional Law. Cambridge University Press.
Sejarah Pengadilan. (2023). PTUN Jakarta. https://ptun-jakarta.go.id/?page_id=14/
Setya, F., 1, P., & Suprobowati, G. D. (2022). Eksistensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Terhadap Pengukuhan Hak Konstitusi Warga Negara. Jurnal Demokrasi Dan Ketahanan Nasional |, 1(4), 2022.
Siaran Pers Kewenangan Legal Administratif Kemenkumham Sebagai Tindak Lanjut Perppu Nomor 2 Tahun 2017. (2017).
Sumadi, A. F. (2011). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Teori dan Praktik. Jurnal Konstitusi, 6(6), 3.
Sumption, Lord. (2019). The Reith Lectures: Law’s Expanding Empire. BBC Radio.
Tschentscher, A. (2002). The Basic Law (Grundgesetz).
Van Klink, Bart, and B. van R. (2018). Jurisdiction in Deleuze: The Expression and Representation of Law. Routledge.
Versteeg, Mila, and E. Z. (2017). Positive Rights in a Republican Moment: The Successes and Limits of Judicial Activism in Argentina. Law & Social Inquiry, 42(1), 63–93.
Wijaya, E. (2011). Pengantar Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. PKIH FH Universitas Pancasila.
