ANALYSIS OF SERVICES IN THE PROCUREMENT OF GOODS AND SERVICES, ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT SERVICES (LPSE) AT THE REGIONAL SECRETARIAT OF KARIMUN
Main Article Content
Yuslinda
Indrayani
Muammar Khaddafi
Bambang Satriawan
This study aims to describe and analyze transparency services and factors that affect transparency in theProcurement of Goods and ElectronicServices (LPSE) in the Sub Division ofService Management Electronic Procurement, Karimun Regency Secretariat. This research uses a qualitative approach. The results of the analysis show that the aspect of transparency indicators in general has shown that LPSE services are quite transparent. Meanwhile, based on the factors that influence it, namely thefactor communicationbetween the committee and the company, there is miscommunication and misunderstanding, technological factors where the internet is not stable, human resource factors shown by the lack of character or mental attitude of LPSE service providers,structure LPSE bureaucraticwhich is still concurrent. position with staff at the Office of Communication and Information in Maros Regency, the acceptance factor of the business community towards the transparency policy is still ineffective and inefficient in the process of procuring goods and services, as well as the factor of LPSE users who are still not maximal in using thesystem e-procurement
Andrianto Nico. (2007). Good e-Government: Transparency and Public Accountability through e-Government. Malang: Bayumedia.
Asian Development Bank. (1999). "Governance: Sound Development Management". Asian Development Bank.
Creswell John W. (2010). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Approaches, Third Edition, Translation by Achmad Fawaid. Yogyakarta: Student Library.
Dwiyanto Agus. (2006). Realizing Good Governance Through Public Services. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada Uiversity Press.
Herman Joffri. (2015). Public Accountability in Electronic Government Procurement of Goods/ Services (E-Procuremet) in North Toraja Regency. Thesis. Hasanuddin University. Makassar.
Kim Pan Suk. (2007). How to Build and Sustain Transparency and Accountability in Public Sector Yonsei University, Seoul. Jakarta: UNDESA collaborates with the Ministry of PAN, UNGC, and UNDP.
Krina Lalolo Loina P. (2003). Indicators and Measurement Tools for the Principles of Accountability, Transparency and Participation. Jakarta: Secretariat of Good Governance of the National Development Planning Agency.
Moleong Lexi J. (2012). Qualitative Research Methodology. Bandung: Youth Rosdakarya.
Sani Asrul. (2011). Evaluation of the Application of E-Procurement in the South Sulawesi Provincial Government. Thesis. Hasanuddin University. Makassar.
Sugiyono. (2011). Qualitative Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ratminto and Winarsih. (2014). Service Management Conceptual Model Development, Implementation of Citizen's Charter and Minimum Service Standards, Printing XII. Yogyakarta: Student Library.
Smith Rex Deighton. (2004). Regulatory Transparency in OECD Countries: Overview, Trends a, d Challenges. Australian: Journal of Public Administration.
