ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP, COMMUNICATION AND MOTIVATION ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE
Main Article Content
Agus Susanto
This study aims to examine the effect of transformational leadership and communication on employee performance with work motivation as an intervening variable at the Dr Wahidin Sudirohusodo National Higher Education Foundation, Medan. The number of samples in this study were 76 respondents using simple random sampling method. This type of research is quantitative research using path analysis techniques and questionnaire data. Path analysis hypothesis test is done by using multiple linear analysis, classical assumption test and intervention test. Based on the results of research with hypothesis testing, the variables of transformational leadership and communication partially have a positive and significant effect on work motivation. The transformational leadership and communication variables partially show a significant effect on employee performance. Transformational leadership on employee performance with work motivation as an intervening variable has a positive and significant indirect effect and there is an influence of communication on employee performance with work motivation as an intervening variable. The variables of transformational leadership and communication have a simultaneous effect on work motivation. The variables of transformational leadership, communication, and work motivation simultaneously affect employee performance with a coefficient of determination of 87.8% which means that the variables of transformational leadership, communication and work motivation can explain employee performance as much as 87.8% and the remaining 12, 2% is explained by other variables such as discipline, commitment, compensation and others. Transformational leadership and communication variables have a simultaneous effect on work motivation. The variables of transformational leadership, communication, and work motivation simultaneously affect employee performance with a coefficient of determination of 87.8% which means that the variables of transformational leadership, communication and work motivation can explain employee performance as much as 87.8% and the remaining 12.2% is explained by other variables such as discipline, commitment, compensation and others. Transformational leadership and communication variables have a simultaneous effect on work motivation. Transformational leadership variables, communication.
Brigham, Eugene, F. 2011. Manajemen Keuangan. Erlangga, Jakarta
Danim, Sudarwan, 2012. Kepemimpinan Pendidikan, Alfabeta, Bandung
______. 2013, Menjadi Komunitas Belajar: Transformasional
Kepemimpinan dalam Komunitas Organisasi Pembelajaran, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta
Dessler, Gary, 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi 10, Indeks, Jakarta
Emad, dkk. 2014. Pentingnya Kepemimpinan dalam Peningkatan Produktivitas Konstruksi. Jurnal Penelitian Lanjutan Global Studi Manajemen dan Bisnis, Vol. 3, no.3, hal: 114-125
Erriani K. 2018. Hubungan Motivasi Kerja dengan Kinerja Pustakawan Bidang Pertanian di Kementerian Pertanian. Skripsi Institut Pertanian Bogor. Jurnal Penyuluhan, Maret 2018 No. 14 Vol. 1
Fattah, Nanang, 2014. Yayasan Manajemen Pendidikan, PT Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Febryantahanuji, 2017, Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja dan Komunikasi Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi dengan Kepemimpinan Sebagai Variabel Moderasi Pada Stekom Semarang. Jurnal Nusamba, Vol.2, No.1
Haryani. 2010. Analisis Pengaruh Komunikasi, Motivasi, dan Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Karyawan PT Arisa Mandiri Pratama,Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, volume 13.
Hasibuan, Melayu. 2008. Dasar Manajemen, Pengertian, dan Masalah. PT Bumi Aksara, Jakarta
Kuswana, Wowa S, 2013. Manajemen Kinerja, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
Mangkunegara, AP 2010, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Rev., Penerbit Bina Aksara, Jakarta
______. 2012, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan, Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung
Marshall Sashkin & Molly G. Sashkin, 2011. Prinsip Kepemimpinan, Erlangga, Jakarta
Nyowani. Tri Wahyuni, 2014, Pengaruh Motivasi dan Pelatihan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai pada BPRS Karya Mugi Sentosa Trenggalek dan BPRS Tanmiya Artha Kediri IAIN Tulungagung.
Richard L. Hughes, dkk, 2012, Kepemimpinan: Memperkaya Pelajaran dari Pengalaman, Edisi 7, Salemba Humanika, Jakarta
Rivai, Veitzal & Ella Jauvani Sagala. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Robbins, Stephen P, & Timothy A Hakim. 2014. Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi Ketigabelas. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Sandy Marta, Muhammad. 2015. Karakteristik Pekerjaan dan Kinerja Dosen Berprestasi di UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung: Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai Variabel Moderating. Skripsi di Universitas Widayatama, Bandung: Tidak Dipublikasikan.
Santoso, S.2010. Statistik Multivariat; Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan SPSS. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo
Sedarmayanti. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil (cetakan kelima). PT Refika, Bandung
Simamora, Wawan, 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, STIE YKPN, Yogyakarta.
Sugiyono. 2017. Statistik untuk Penelitian. CV Alfabeta, Bandung
Sunyoto, Danang. 2012.Sumber daya manusia Manajemen. Pusat Layanan Penerbitan Akademik (CAPS), Yogyakarta.
______. 2013, Teori, Kuesioner, dan Analisis Data Sumber Daya Manusia (Praktek Penelitian), Pusat Layanan Penerbitan Akademik (CAPS), Yogyakarta.
Supardi, dan Anwar Syaiful, 2012, Dasar-dasar Perilaku Organisasi, UII Pres, Yogyakarta.
Sutrisno, Edy. 2011.Sumber daya manusia Manajemen Kencana, Jakarta
Suyadi. 2013. Strategi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Karakter. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung
Umam, Khaerul, 2012. Perilaku Organisasi, Pustaka Setia, Bandung
Veithzal Rivai. 2014.Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan, Edisi 6, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Depok
Yukl, Gary, 2015. Kepemimpinan dan Organisasi, Edisi 5, Indeks , Jakarta
