KAIZEN 5'S INDUSTRIAL WORK CULTURE-BASED SCHOOL FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT MODEL'S SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS (SDGS) AT STATE VOCATIONAL SCHOOLS IN THE BIREUEN REGENCY
Main Article Content
Azhari
Arif Rahman
Aman Simaremare
Yuniarto Mudjisusatyo
Kisno
Sherly
Introduction: An essential part of Indonesia's National Education Standards are the infrastructure and facilities for education. All formal and informal educational institutions are required to provide facilities that assist students' physical, intellectual, social, emotional, and psychological development, as stipulated in Article 45 of the National Education System Law No. 20 of 2003. Objective: In order to create a school facilities and infrastructure management model that is focused on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), this project will integrate the 5S Kaizen industrial work culture into vocational schools (SMK Negeri) in the Bireuen Regency. It also assesses how useful and successful the model is at streamlining school facility management. Method: The study used Plomp's model as part of its Research & Development (R&D) process, which consisted of five stages: analysis, design, development, implementation, and assessment. Principals, vice principals, heads of expertise programs, workshop leaders, administrative leaders, and effective teachers were among the participants. Validated by expert evaluations, implementation observations, response surveys, and competency tests, the research tools included a model book, an implementation manual, and a module guide. Results: The average validation scores for the generated model were 4.57 (model), 4.62 (implementation handbook), and 4.63 (module guide), indicating strong validity. Positive participant response rates in trials I and II were 85.91% and 86.31%, respectively, indicating that classical completeness was attained. The N-Gain analysis classified its effectiveness as moderate, showing competency gains of 61.75% and 62.21%. Conclusion: The model promotes ongoing advancement in vocational education by encouraging an organized, industry-based approach to SDG-aligned school facility management. For policymakers and school administrators working in vocational education settings, this study offers a novel paradigm for incorporating industrial methodologies—specifically, 5S Kaizen—into the administration of educational infrastructure.
C. Narvaez Rojas, G. A. Alomia Peñafiel, D. F. Loaiza Buitrago, and C. A. Tavera Romero, “Society 5.0: A Japanese Concept for a Superintelligent Society,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 12, p. 6567, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13126567.
S. Huang, B. Wang, X. Li, P. Zheng, D. Mourtzis, and L. Wang, “Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—Comparison, complementation and co-evolution,” J Manuf Syst, vol. 64, pp. 424–428, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.07.010.
E. G. Carayannis and J. Morawska-Jancelewicz, “The Futures of Europe: Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 as Driving Forces of Future Universities,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 3445–3471, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13132-021-00854-2.
V. Potočan, M. Mulej, and Z. Nedelko, “Society 5.0: balancing of Industry 4.0, economic advancement and social problems,” Kybernetes, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 794–811, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1108/K-12-2019-0858.
D. Mourtzis, J. Angelopoulos, and N. Panopoulos, “A Literature Review of the Challenges and Opportunities of the Transition from Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0,” Energies (Basel), vol. 15, no. 17, p. 6276, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15176276.
S. P. Hota, “Education infrastructure, expenditure, enrollment & economic development in Odisha, India,” Int J Educ Dev, vol. 103, p. 102903, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102903.
E. A. Opabola, C. Galasso, T. Rossetto, E. Meilianda, Y. Idris, and S. Nurdin, “Investing in disaster preparedness and effective recovery of school physical infrastructure,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 90, p. 103623, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103623.
A. Suppasri et al., “Cascading disasters triggered by tsunami hazards: A perspective for critical infrastructure resilience and disaster risk reduction,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 66, p. 102597, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102597.
R. Wiranto and S. Slameto, “Alumni satisfaction in terms of classroom infrastructure, lecturer professionalism, and curriculum,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 6, p. e06679, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06679.
J. R. Hanaysha, F. B. Shriedeh, and M. In’airat, “Impact of classroom environment, teacher competency, information and communication technology resources, and university facilities on student engagement and academic performance,” International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 100188, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100188.
J. Miranda et al., “The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education,” Computers & Electrical Engineering, vol. 93, p. 107278, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107278.
Y. Mudjisusatyo, D. Darwin, and K. Kisno, “The use ADDIE model to improve the competence of the higher education task force in obtaining competitive funding for the independent campus program,” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1108/JARHE-12-2023-0580.
S. Sherly, K. Kisno, and A. KeÅ¡ner, “Vocational High School Entrepreneurship Learning Management Model based on Local Wisdom Products,” Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 644–653, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.46843/jiecr.v4i4.753.
Y. Mudjisusatyo, D. Darwin, and K. Kisno, “Change management in Independent Campus program: application of the ADKAR model as a change management competency constructor,” Cogent Education, vol. 11, no. 1, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2381892.
N. Sitanggang, P. L. A. Luthan, and K. Kisno, “Supportive Leadership Model in Vocational High School: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach,” The New Educational Review, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 133–147, 2023, doi: 10.15804/tner.23.72.2.10.
G. Sharma and G. R. Patil, “Spatial and social inequities for educational services accessibility - A case study for schools in Greater Mumbai,” Cities, vol. 122, p. 103543, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103543.
Y. Hanafi et al., “The new identity of Indonesian Islamic boarding schools in the ‘new normal’: the education leadership response to COVID-19,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 3, p. e06549, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06549.
N. V. K. Jasti, V. Venkateswaran, and S. Kota, “Total Quality Management in higher education: a literature review on barriers, customers and accreditation,” The TQM Journal, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1250–1272, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1108/TQM-11-2020-0256.
A. J. Kwarteng, “An assessment of outcome criteria associated with the implementation of TQM in a higher education institution in Ghana,” Cogent Education, vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2020.1859198.
Z. Han, C. Cui, Y. Kong, Q. Li, Y. Chen, and X. Chen, “Improving educational equity by maximizing service coverage in rural Changyuan, China: An evaluation-optimization-validation framework based on spatial accessibility to schools,” Applied Geography, vol. 152, p. 102891, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102891.
K. B. Pal et al., “Education system of Nepal: impacts and future perspectives of COVID-19 pandemic,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 9, p. e08014, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08014.
M. Helmold, A. Küçük Yılmaz, T. Flouris, T. Winner, V. Cvetkoska, and T. Dathe, Lean Management, Kaizen, Kata and Keiretsu. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-10104-5.
A. S. T. Junior and R. A. Nagai, “Lean and Green: 3Ms Meets 5Rs Creating Environmental Value for the Planet,” 2024, pp. 99–119. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-48079-9_6.
A. Fedajev, D. Jovanović, and M. Veličković, “Shifting from Physical to Virtual Classroom in Accounting Education: A Study of Students’ Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Serbia,” 2024, pp. 185–209. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-49353-9_10.
V. Yadav et al., “Green Lean Six Sigma for sustainability improvement: a systematic review and future research agenda,” International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 759–790, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-06-2022-0132.
T. M. Putra, C. Yulia, and Ana, “Systematic Literature Review on the Use of English in Workplace,” 2022. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.220305.023.
N. Herath, C. Duffield, and L. Zhang, “Public-school infrastructure ageing and current challenges in maintenance,” J Qual Maint Eng, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 401–419, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1108/JQME-06-2021-0043.
Md. Z. Hasan, A. Mallik, and J.-C. Tsou, “Learning method design for engineering students to be prepared for Industry 4.0: a Kaizen approach,” Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 182–198, May 2020, doi: 10.1108/HESWBL-07-2019-0098.
M. A. K. Alsmairat, J. El Baz, and N. Al-Ma’aitah, “Investigating the performance of quality management practices induced by top management commitment and Kaizen initiatives: evidence from Jordanian public hospitals in the aftermath of COVID-19,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 585–607, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-11-2022-0316.
M. M. Asad, A. A. Rind, and A. A. Abdulmuhsin, “The effect of knowledge management in educational settings: a study of education management organizations (EMOs) schools of Pakistan,” International Journal of Organizational Analysis, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1156–1171, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1108/IJOA-12-2020-2521.
J. C. C. Carrillo-Beltrán, M. del C. Llanos-Ramírez, A. Ramírez-Jiménez, and M. R. Bogarin-Correa, “Educational innovation: an approach to the japanese Kaizen method in university students. Reflections and perspectives,” Revista Teoría Educativa, vol. 8, no. 19, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.35429/JET.2024.8.19.1.10.
S. Iqbal, K. Moosa, and C. A. Bin Taib, “Optimizing quality enhancement cells in higher education institutions: analyzing management support, quality infrastructure and staff training,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1572–1593, May 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-01-2021-0007.
H. A. Nguyen, K. Yokozawa, and M. F. Suárez-Barraza, “A sense of urgency as a driver of individual kaizen performance: moderating role of organizational culture,” The TQM Journal, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1442–1459, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1108/TQM-06-2023-0169.
H. Amoozad Mahdiraji, H. Sharifpour Arabi, J. A. Garza-Reyes, and A. Jabbar, “Measuring the readiness level for Kaizen projects: a multi-layer Bayesian decision-making framework,” The TQM Journal, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1420–1441, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1108/TQM-06-2023-0166.
S. Ivaldi, G. Scaratti, and E. Fregnan, “Dwelling within the fourth industrial revolution: organizational learning for new competences, processes and work cultures,” Journal of Workplace Learning, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–26, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1108/JWL-07-2020-0127.
W. Kucharska, “Leadership, culture, intellectual capital and knowledge processes for organizational innovativeness across industries: the case of Poland,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 121–141, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1108/JIC-02-2021-0047.
H. H. Berhe, H. S. Gebremichael, and K. T. Beyene, “Development, validation and verification of innovative integrated Kaizen philosophy (CI) framework and its implementation procedure for enhancing manufacturing industries sustainable competitiveness,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2463–2518, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-08-2022-0258.
F. González-Aleu, M. Francisco Suarez Barraza, J. A. Garza-Reyes, and J. Antony, “Guest editorial: Quality 4.0 and Kaizen during disruptive times: addressing the triple helix actors’ COVID-19 pandemic challenges,” The TQM Journal, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1397–1401, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1108/TQM-07-2024-428.
B. Bhardwaj and N. Kalia, “Contextual and task performance: role of employee engagement and organizational culture in hospitality industry,” Vilakshan - XIMB Journal of Management, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 187–201, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1108/XJM-08-2020-0089.
D.-L. Gómez-Molina and J. Moyano-Fuentes, “Lean management in universities: a systematic literature review,” International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 156–177, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-12-2020-0224.
M. Kharub, H. Gupta, S. Rana, and O. McDermott, “Employee’s performance and Kaizen events’ success: does supervisor behaviour play a moderating role?,” The TQM Journal, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 2336–2366, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1108/TQM-06-2022-0203.
K. Siew Mui, R. Muthuveloo, and J. I. L. Chan, “Antecedents of kaizen culture and its effect on operational performance: perspective of manufacturing companies in Malaysia,” The TQM Journal, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1648–1666, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1108/TQM-06-2021-0188.
J. Moyano-Fuentes, J. M. Maqueira-Marín, P. J. Martínez-Jurado, and M. Sacristán-Díaz, “Extending lean management along the supply chain: impact on efficiency,” Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 63–84, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1108/JMTM-10-2019-0388.
A. M. Aamer, M. A. Al-Awlaqi, N. Mandahawi, F. Triawan, and F. Al-Madi, “Kaizen transferability in non-Japanese cultures: a combined approach of total interpretive structural modeling and analytic network process,” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 3245–3269, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-10-2020-0505.
N. Bouranta, E. Psomas, and J. Antony, “Human factors involved in lean management: a systematic literature review,” Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, vol. 33, no. 9–10, pp. 1113–1145, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1080/14783363.2021.1936481.
A. El Jaouhari, J. Arif, S. Fellaki, M. Amejwal, and K. Azzouz, “Lean supply chain management and Industry 4.0 interrelationships: the status quo and future perspectives,” International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 335–367, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-11-2021-0192.
K. Kisno, S. Milfayetty, N. Sitanggang, and M. J. Lubis, “The System Approach for Entrepreneurship-Based School Management in Vocational High Schools,” AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 3261–3270, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.3068.
