THE EFFECT OF WORK LIFE BALANCE AND HYBRID WORKING SYSTEM ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF THE MARKETING DIVISION AT PT. PIM
Main Article Content
Likdanawati
Hamdiah
Muttaqien
This study aims to evaluate the influence of Work Life Balance and Hybrid Working System on the productivity of employees in the Marketing Division at PT. PIM. The research adopts a quantitative approach with a causal-comparative method. The entire population consists of employees in the Marketing Division, with samples selected using purposive sampling based on at least one year of work experience and prior participation in a hybrid working system. Data analysis employs the Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) method, considered suitable for assessing relationships among latent variables and indicators in cases of non-normal data and relatively small sample sizes. The results indicate that Work Life Balance has a positive and significant effect on employee productivity; in other words, the better the work life balance experienced by employees, the higher their productivity. In addition, the Hybrid Working System also shows a positive and significant effect on productivity. An optimally implemented hybrid system provides flexibility in managing work time and location, thereby increasing motivation, reducing fatigue, and driving employee productivity.
Bloom, N., et al. (2024, June 12). Study finds hybrid work benefits companies and employees. Stanford Report.
Choudhury, P. (2023, December 7). Is Hybrid Work the Best of Both Worlds? Evidence from a Field Experiment. Harvard Kennedy School.
Fana, M., Tolan, S., Torrejón Pérez, S., Urzi Brancati, M.C., & Fernández-Macías, E. (2020). The COVID confinement measures and EU labour markets. JRC Working Papers Series on Labour, Education and Technology.
Fisher, G. G., Bulger, C. A., & Smith, C. S. (2023). Beyond Work and Family: A Measure of Work/Nonwork Interference and Enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 28(1), 15-30.
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541.
Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2023). Partial Least Squares: Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi SmartPLS 4.0 untuk Penelitian Empiris. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Allen, T. D. (2011). Work-family balance: A review and extension of the literature. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 165–183). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Hughes, J. (2024). Digital presenteeism: The new workplace epidemic. Nature, 616(7979), 23–24.
Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672.
Medina-Garrido, J. A., Biedma-Ferrer, J. M., & Ramos-Rodríguez, A. R. (2023). Relationship between work family balance, employee well being and job performance. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.13683
Pratama, F., & Fatoni, M. (2024). The effect of work life balance program on employee productivity in the digital era. Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Indonesia, 12(1), 45–56.
Purwanto, A. (2022). Pengaruh work-life balance terhadap kinerja karyawan pada masa pandemi. Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, 14(1), 101–109.
Putri, D. R., & Rofiaty, R. (2023). Work life balance dan pengaruhnya terhadap produktivitas kerja karyawan di perusahaan jasa. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 67(2), 130–140.
Research Institute (IJCRT). (2023–2024). The impact of hybrid working conditions on employee productivity. IJCRT.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational Behavior (17th ed.). Pearson.
Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16–59.
