BEYOND THE PING-PONG TABLE: BUILDING AUTHENTIC EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT
DOI:
10.54443/morfai.v6i1.4610Published:
2025-12-06Downloads
Abstract
Based on an analysis of qualitative employee interview data, this study investigates the primary drivers of authentic workplace engagement beyond material compensation. The objective was to identify the non-transactional factors that foster sustained commitment and discretionary effort. The results revealed four interconnected themes: the primacy of meaningful work over perks; the critical role of managerial support in building psychological safety; the necessity of clear career trajectories for growth; and the profound impact of personalized, authentic recognition. The discussion indicates that perks and pay are merely foundational, while true engagement is cultivated through purpose, safety, growth, and feeling valued as a whole person. The conclusion underscores that engagement is a reciprocal relationship, where employees invest fully in organizations that demonstrably invest in their employees’ professional and personal value.
Keywords:
psychological safety, purposeful work, career growth, authentic recognition, employee engagementReferences
Abdul Hamed, S., Mohd Hussain, Mohd. R., Md Jani, H. H., Shah Sabri, S. S., & Rusli, N. (2025). The Impact of Office Innovation in the Physical Workplace on Employee and Organizational Outcomes. Semarak Advanced Research in Organizational Behaviour, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37934/sarob.4.1.112
Alexandersson, A., & Kalonaityte, V. (2018). Playing to Dissent: The Aesthetics and Politics of Playful Office Design. Organization Studies, 39(2–3), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617717545
Armitage, L. A., & Amar, J. H. N. (2021a). Person-Environment Fit Theory. In A Handbook of Theories on Designing Alignment between People and the Office Environment (pp. 14–26). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003128830-2
Armitage, L. A., & Amar, J. H. N. (2021b). Person-Environment Fit Theory. In A Handbook of Theories on Designing Alignment between People and the Office Environment (pp. 14–26). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003128830-2
Bawan, S. B. D., Setyanto, A., & Kurniawan, M. P. (2022). Pengaruh Kualitas Sistem, Kualitas Informasi dan Kualitas Layanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Sistem Informasi Akademik Sekolah Tinggi Agama Kristen Protestan Negeri (STAKPN) Sentani. Buletin Poltanesa, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.51967/tanesa.v23i2.1857
Botting, S. (2022). The great workplace reset : Pivoting to the human experience in the war for talent. Corporate Real Estate Journal, 11(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.69554/NQMK2550
De Paoli, D., Sauer, E., & Ropo, A. (2019). The spatial context of organizations: A critique of ‘creative workspaces.’ Journal of Management & Organization, 25(02), 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.46
Dilakshini, V. L., & Kumar, S. M. (2019). Fun Culture in the Work Place: A Systematic Review. Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.9734/jemt/2019/v23i630148
Eshehri, A., & Alsoaery, A. (2023). The Orgnisation Performance and the Culture of Fun: Review in Changing World. Archives of Business Research, 8(8), 358–362. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.88.15323
Georganta, K., & Montgomery, A. (2019). Workplace fun: a matter of context and not content. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 14(3), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-06-2017-1541
Khazanchi, S., Sprinkle, T. A., Masterson, S. S., & Tong, N. (2018). A Spatial Model of Work Relationships: The Relationship-Building and Relationship-Straining Effects of Workspace Design. Academy of Management Review, 43(4), 590–609. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0240
Maślikowska, M., & Gibbert, M. (2019). The relationship between working spaces and organizational cultures. Facilities, 37(13/14), 1153–1165. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-06-2018-0072
Petelczyc, C. A., Capezio, A., Wang, L., Restubog, S. L. D., & Aquino, K. (2018). Play at Work: An Integrative Review and Agenda for Future Research. Journal of Management, 44(1), 161–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317731519
Plester, B., & Lloyd, R. (2024). New frontiers of fun: sharing and supporting workplace fun in hybrid work. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 46(4), 934–954. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-07-2023-0366
Suryavanshi, S., & Mandal, T. K. (2024). UNCONVENTIONAL OFFICES, WORKPLACE DESIGN AFFECTING MILLENNIALS & GEN-Z INVOLVEMENT IN OFFICE. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i6.2024.5534
Yunus, E. N., & Ernawati, E. (2018). Productivity paradox? The impact of office redesign on employee productivity. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(9), 1918–1939. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2017-0350
Zaharee, M., Lipkie, T., Mehlman, , Stewart K., & Neylon, S. K. (2018). Recruitment and Retention of Early-Career Technical Talent. Research-Technology Management, 61(5), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2018.1495966
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bangun Budi Raharjanti, Ramon Zamora, Lukmanul Hakim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
