POWER RELATIONS AND ACCESS TO NATURAL RESOURCES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ECOLOGICAL CONFLICTS IN NATIONAL STRATEGIC PROJECTS IN INDONESIA (ANDESITE MINE IN WADAS VILLAGE AND ECO-CITY IN REMPANG ISLAND 2017-2024)
DOI:
10.54443/morfai.v6i1.4795Published:
2025-12-23Downloads
Abstract
This study analyzes ecological conflicts within the framework of the National Strategic Project (PSN) in Wadas Village (Central Java) and Rempang Island (Riau Islands) using the access theory developed by Jesse Ribot and Nancy Peluso (2003). This theory views access as the ability of actors to obtain benefits from natural resources through legal and non-legal mechanisms, such as power, capital, discourse, and social networks. This approach is used to understand the competition between the state, corporations, and local communities in controlling and utilizing natural resources in the context of national development. This study uses a qualitative research method with a comparative political studies approach. Data were obtained through a review of literature, policy documents, advocacy organization reports, and media coverage relevant to the conflict dynamics in both regions. The research findings show that the conflicts in Wadas and Rempang share structural similarities, both rooted in the development of National Strategic Projects that legitimize the expansion of access to natural resources by powerful state and private actors. Powerful actors utilize a combination of legal access, political authority, and development discourse to open up space for development and investment interests. Nevertheless, communities demonstrate collective resistance rooted in ecological, social, and cultural claims. The main differences lie in the nature of the resources and the mechanisms of exclusion. The Wadas conflict is prominent in its ecological-agrarian dimension due to andesite mining that threatens agricultural land and water sources, while the Rempang conflict is more focused on the economic-political and cultural dimensions resulting from the relocation of communities from coastal areas for industrialization projects. Thus, ecological conflicts in Indonesia are a manifestation of the politics of access, namely the struggle between actors for the ability to benefit from natural resources under the hegemony of national development.
Keywords:
Power Relations Access to Natural Resources Ecological ConflictReferences
Aisha Nur Habiba, Annisa Ayu Melati, Nur Hamda Sa'idah, Wike Vimayanti, “Actualization of Human Rights in the Case of Rempang Island in Indonesia from an Environmental Law Perspective”, Sehasen Law Journal, No. 2, (2023), 375-384.
Aman, MD (2023). Politics of access and agrarian conflict in Wadas Village. Journal of Politics and Government, 14(2), 115–133.
Elvira Valentine; Marchell Nabil Muhamad; Mochamad Ikhsan Nur Hakim, “The Rempang Island Conflict in the Perspective of Karl Marx's Class Theory”, Journal of Contemporary Studies of Law and Society, 02:01, (2023), 1-25.
Elvira, V., Muhamad, MN, & Hakim, MIN (2023). The Rempang Island Conflict from the Perspective of Karl Marx's Class Theory. Journal of Contemporary Law and Society Studies, 2(1), 1–25.
Hall, D., Hirsch, P., & Li, T. M. (2011). Powers of exclusion: Land dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
Harvey, D. (2003). The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hill, H., & State, S. D. (2019). The Indonesian Economy in Transition: Policy Challenges in the Jokowi Era and Beyond. Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
National Human Rights Commission. (2023). Report on the findings of the monitoring and investigation of the Rempang conflict. Jakarta: National Human Rights Commission of the Republic of Indonesia.
Kurniawan, A., & Nugraha, F. (2024). State interests and conflicts in the development of Rempang Eco-City. Journal of Public Policy Studies, 9(1), 45–60.
Yogyakarta Legal Aid Institute (LBH). (2022). Advocacy report of the Wadas community in the Bener Dam andesite mining conflict. Yogyakarta: LBH Yogyakarta.
Li, T. M. (2007). The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Peluso, N. L., & Lund, C. (2011). New frontiers of land control: Introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(4), 667–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.607692
Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003). A theory of access. Rural Sociology, 68(2), 153–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x
Salim, W., & Negara, SD (2019). Shifting the capital from Jakarta: Reasons and challenges. ISEAS Perspective, (79).
Syofina Dwi Putri Aritonang, Ida Bagus Ayodya Maheswara, “Legal Review of the Resident Relocation Conflict on Rempang Island Based on the Perspective of Legal Authority Theory”, Ibrahim Law Review, No 3, (2023), 472-483.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Asdin Asri, Riaty Raffiudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
