PARTICIPATION IN THE 2024 LEGISLATIVE ELECTION FOR THE REGIONAL PEOPLE'S REPRESENTATIVE COUNCIL OF DAPIL 5, DONGGALA REGENCY
DOI:
10.54443/morfai.v6i2.4946Published:
2026-01-17Downloads
Abstract
Voter participation constitutes a fundamental dimension of democratic governance, particularly within legislative elections that shape policy-making at the regional level. This study examines voter participation in the 2024 legislative election for the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) in Electoral District 5 of Donggala Regency, Indonesia. Employing a qualitative descriptive research design, the study draws on in-depth interviews, non-participant observation, and analysis of official electoral documents to explore the patterns and determinants of electoral participation. The findings reveal that while voter turnout in the district remained relatively stable, participation was predominantly procedural rather than substantive. Many voters engaged in the electoral process without sufficient understanding of legislative functions, candidate programs, or policy implications. Voter participation was strongly influenced by political literacy, candidate-centered mobilization strategies, socioeconomic considerations, and the quality of electoral administration. Furthermore, the simultaneous conduct of elections in 2024 contributed to reduced voter attention toward legislative contests, thereby limiting meaningful engagement. The study concludes that voter participation in Electoral District 5 reflects broader challenges of local democratic consolidation in Indonesia, where formal participation persists amid weak deliberative quality. Strengthening civic education, improving party institutionalization, and enhancing the responsiveness of local legislative institutions are essential to fostering more informed and substantive voter participation in future elections.
Keywords:
local democracy legislative elections voter participationReferences
Aspinall, E. (2014). When brokers betray: Clientelism, social networks, and electoral politics in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 46(4), 545–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2014.960706
Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2019). Indonesia’s democratic paradox: Competitive elections amidst rising illiberalism. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 55(3), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2019.1690412
Blais, A. (2006). What affects voter turnout? Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105121
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Buehler, M., & Tan, P. J. (2007). Party–candidate relationships in Indonesian local politics. Journal of East Asian Studies, 7(1), 41–69.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. University of Chicago Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press.
Dalton, R. J. (2017). The participation gap: Social status and political inequality. Oxford University Press.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Row.
Fossati, D. (2019). The resurgence of ideology in Indonesia: Political Islam, Aliran, and political behaviour. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 38(2), 119–148.
Franklin, M. N. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. Cambridge University Press.
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. (2023). Voter turnout database. IDEA.
Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. Sage Publications.
Komisi Pemilihan Umum. (2020). Laporan nasional pemilihan umum 2019. KPU Republik Indonesia.
Komisi Pemilihan Umum. (2024). Evaluasi penyelenggaraan pemilu 2024. KPU Republik Indonesia.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Mietzner, M. (2020). Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: Electoral narrowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization, 27(6), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1704266
Mappatoba, M., Wirawan, H., Salam, R., Hattab, S., & Daswati, D. (2025). Ketika perempuan bersuara: menyelidiki bagaimana gender mempengaruhi pengaruh ketidakramahan di tempat kerja terhadap kinerja melalui perilaku bersuara. Jurnal Administrasi Publik Asia Pasifik , 47 (2), 165-185.
Mujani, S., Liddle, R. W., & Ambardi, K. (2018). Voting behavior in Indonesia since democratization. Cambridge University Press.
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press.
Norris, P. (2015). Why elections fail. Journal of Democracy, 26(3), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0041
Tapsell, R. (2021). Media power in Indonesia: Oligarchs, citizens and the digital revolution. Rowman & Littlefield.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Umi Farida Rohmah, Irwan Waris, M Nur Alamsyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
