ANALYSIS RISK MANAGEMENT FOR PROCUREMENT OF GOODS AND SERVICES IN DAM PROJECTS
Published:
2026-01-31Downloads
Abstract
Dam projects are construction projects with a high level of complexity and uncertainty, particularly during the procurement of goods and services. A poorly managed procurement process has the potential to pose significant risks to project performance in terms of cost, time, quality, and safety. This study aims to identify risk indicators for procurement of goods and services during the vendor selection stage of a dam project, determine priority risks based on the Severity Index (SI) and Risk Index (RI), and formulate appropriate risk responses. The research method used is a quantitative approach with data collection through literature studies, observations, interviews, and questionnaires distributed to respondents experienced in the field of procurement and dam project management. Risk analysis was conducted referring to the ISO 31000:2018 risk management framework. The results show that procurement risks are spread across aspects of administration and compliance, vendor technical and capability, financial and price, time and performance, occupational safety and health, and the supply chain. Some risks are categorized as high to very high and require priority control. This study provides a practical contribution in the form of risk mapping and risk response recommendations that can be used as a basis for procurement decisions in dam projects.
Keywords:
Risk Management Procurement Of Goods and Services Dam Projects Iso 31000:2018 Severity Index Risk IndexReferences
Brammer, S., & Walker, H. (2011). Sustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(4), 452–476. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111119551
Cahyani, Z. D., Pribadi, S. R. W., & Baihaqi, I. (2019). Studi Implementasi Model House of Risk (HOR) Untuk Mitigasi Risiko Keterlambatan Material Dan Komponen Impor Pada Pembangunan Kapal Baru. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373539.v5i2.16526
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods (4 ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Cunha, P., Ribeiro, P. 2022. Definition of a technique for characterizing the expected benefits of a
project, Procedia Computer Science 196 (2022) 1007-1012
Darma, E. (2017). Analisis Manajemen Risiko Dan Pengendalian Intern Pada Pengadaan Jasa Konstruksi (Studi Kasus Pengadaan Jasa Konstruksi Pada SKPD Di Lingkungan Pemerintahan Provinsi Sumatera Barat).
Erlangga Adi, D. &. (2017). Analisis Manajemen Risiko Aktivitas Pengadaan pada Percetakan Surat Kabar. In Jurnal Metris (Vol.18). http://ojs.atmajaya.ac.id/index.php/metris.
Fakhratov M., Chulkov, V., Kuzhin, M., Akbari, M.S. (2020). Risk Management implementation and presenting the applicable methodology for its implementation in construction projects. E3s web of conferences. 1-9doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202016410014
Heckmann, I., Comes, T., & Nickel, S. (2015). A critical review on supply chain risk Definition, measure and modeling. Omega, 52, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.004
Hermawan, A., & Arumsari, D. (2021). Manajemen Risiko dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah: Studi pada Instansi Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 8(2), 101–112.
Junaidi, Zarfinal, & Anif, B. (2024). Manajemen Risiko pada Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Bendung Batang Pagian Kabupaten Dharmasraya. Jurnal Talenta Sipil, vol 7(2), pp. 820-828.
Kleindorfer, P. R., & Saad, G. H. (2005). Managing Disruption Risks in Supply Chains. Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00009.x
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015). The quest for good governance. Cambridge University Press.
Pedoman Pengadaan Barang/Jasa no A5-001/I00100/2019-S9 Rev 0. (2020). Pramana, T. (2011). Manajemen Risiko Bisnis. Sinar Ilmu Publishing.
Prawira, G. (2020). Analisis Efektivitas Proses Pengadaan Barang di Instansi Pemerintah: Studi Kasus pada BLU. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 14(1), 55–69.
Pujawan, I. N., & Geraldin, L. H. (2009). House of Risk: Model for Proactive Supply Chain Risk Management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 15(6), 953–967.
Safitri, K. I. (2019). Analisis Dan Mitigasi Risiko Menggunakan House Of Risk Dan Fuzzy Logic Pada Rantai Pasok PT. Petronika.
Sujarwadi, J., Anwar, S., Zaki, M., & Kurniyaningrum, E. (2024). Analisis Faktro Risiko Proyek Konstruksi Jembatan Karangsong-Karangjruju Indramayu. Journal Syntax Idea, vol 6(8), pp. 3655-3668.
Tubagus, M. M. (t.thn.). Usulan Strategi Mitigasi Risiko Pada Pengadaan Bahan Baku Kain Denim dengan Pendekatan Matriks House of Risk (HOR). jurnal ITENAS.
Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. In International Journal of Production Economics (Vol. 103, Nomor 2, hal. 451–488). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.006
Vikaliana, R. (2013). Analisis Pengendalian Risiko Berdasarkan Key Risk Indicator pada CV Suratin Bamboo. Economicus.
Wang, M., Asian, S., Wood, L. C., & Wang, B. (2020). Logistics innovation capability and its impacts on the supply chain risks in the Industry 4.0 era. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 2(2), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/mscra-07-2019-0015
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bambang Asmoro, Silia Yuslim, Endah Kurniyaningrum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
