REGULATORY AUTONOMY OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES IN THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE LEGAL SYSTEM: NORMATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES
Published:
2024-03-29Downloads
Abstract
This study examines the legal relationship between trade liberalization commitments within the framework of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the right of developing countries to regulate. The expansion of the WTO’s scope into domestic jurisdictions has legal implications for the policy space of developing countries in the process of formulating national legislation, particularly in the sectors of public health and environmental protection. Using a doctrinal legal research methodology, this study examines general exceptions, Special and Differential Treatment (S&DT), and the jurisprudence of the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB). The research findings outline three key points. First, legal recognition of regulatory autonomy is subject to certain normative limitations. The necessity test and empirical standard of proof under the SPS and TBT Agreements create an imbalance in the burden of proof for developing countries, which has the potential to affect the sustainability of the national legislative process (regulatory chill). Second, the S&DT principle, formulated to accommodate differences in economic capacity, tends to be declaratory in its application. This results in limitations on the binding force of the instrument as a legal basis for defense in dispute resolution. Third, legal interpretations by dispute settlement bodies have direct legal consequences for domestic autonomy. Furthermore, administrative constraints at the Appellate Body level and the implementation of the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA) also affect the fulfillment of the principle of legal certainty at the appellate stage. This study concludes that the formulation of national legislation requires the fulfillment of a pre-formulation feasibility review (ex-ante assessment). Additionally, multilateral harmonization efforts are needed to fundamental legal justification.
Keywords:
Regulatory Autonomy Policy Space Developing Countries Dispute Resolution.References
Adu, E. O. (2022). EU and African Approaches to ISDS Reform-On the Road to a Multilateral Investment Court System.
Ahamat, H., & Rahman, N. A. (2018). Halal food, market access and exception to wto law: new aspects learned from indonesia-chicken products. Asian J. WTO & Int’l Health L & Pol’y, 13, 355.
Bansal, V., & Deshpande, C. (2017). The India-Solar Cells Dispute: Renewable Energy Subsidies under World Trade Law and the Need for Environmental Exceptions. NUJS Law Review, 10, 209.
Bown, C. P., & Trachtman, J. P. (2009). Brazil – Measures Affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres: A Balancing Act. World Trade Review, 8(1), 85–135.
Correa, C. M. (2002). Implications of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS agreement and public health. World Health Organization.
Dotzauer, M., Biber-Freudenberger, L., & Dietz, T. (2024). The rise of sustainability provisions in international investment agreements. Global Environmental Politics, 24(4), 10–36.
Drope, J., & Lencucha, R. (2014). Evolving norms at the intersection of health and trade. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 39(3), 591–631.
Harris, R., & Moon, G. (2015). GATT article XX and human rights: what do we know from the first 20 years? Melbourne Journal of International Law, 16(2), 432–483.
Hegde, V., & Wouters, J. (2021). Special and Differential Treatment Under the World Trade Organization: A Legal Typology. Journal of International Economic Law, 24(3), 551–571.
Hoen, E. (2022). Protecting Public Health through Technology Transfer: The Unfulfilled Promise of the TRIPS Agreement. Health and Human Rights Journal, 24(2), 211–214.
Howse, R. (2016). The World Trade Organization 20 Years On: Global Governance by Judiciary. European Journal of International Law, 27(1), 9–77.
Howse, R., & Langille, J. (2023). Continuity and change in the World Trade Organization: Pluralism past, present, and future. American Journal of International Law, 117(1), 1–47.
Ismail, F. (2020). WTO reform and the crisis of multilateralism: A Developing Country Perspective. South Centre.
Johnson, L. (2016). Space for Local Content Policies and Strategies: A Crucial Time to Revisit an Old Debate.
Karttunen, M., & Moore, M. O. (2018). India–solar cells: trade rules, climate policy, and sustainable development goals. World Trade Review, 17(2), 215–237.
Kleen, P., & Page, S. (2005). Special and differential treatment of developing countries in the World Trade Organization. Overseas Development Institute.
Kuntze, J.-C., & Moerenhout, T. (2012). Local Content Requirements and the Renewable Energy Industry-A Good Match? Available at SSRN 2188607.
Kusumaatmadja, M. (1996). Investasi di Indonesia dalam Kaitannya dengan Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Hasil Putaran Uruguay. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 3(5), 6.
Land, M. (2012). Rebalancing TRIPS, 33 Mich. J. Int’l L, 433.
Mitchell, A. D. (2023). The right to regulate and the interpretation of the WTO Agreement. Journal of International Economic Law, 26(3), 462–482.
Morgan, G. (2023). The MPIA : A Viable Temporary Alternative. Afronomicslaw, 1–5. https://www.afronomicslaw.org/about
Nahruddin, Z., Ahmad, B., Ibrahim, M. A., & Tang, M. (2024). Legal Aspects of Environmental Governance Related to Renewable Energy Development. Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision, 4(3), 201–211.
Nasution, A. R. (2021). Political and Economic Justifications for Conditional Trade Barriers: Anti-Dumping Duty, Safeguard Measure and National Security Exception. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(3), 4256–4262.
Nasution, A. R., Fikri, R. A., Fatmawati, I., & Perangin-Angin, M. E. (2024). Conflicts Between Environmental and Trade Norms: A Legal Analysis of the Application of the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) to Indonesian Palm Oil Exports Based on the GATT-WTO Legal Framework. International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences (Injects), 6(1), 308–317.
Paine, J. (2021). Autonomy to set the level of regulatory protection in international investment law. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 70(3), 697–736.
Pramudyawati, R. D. (2024). Retaliasi Sebagai Opsi Alat Penegakan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdagangan Internasional Akibat Krisis di Badan Banding World Trade Organization. UNES Law Review, 6(3), 8394–8411.
Qin, J. (2007). WTO Panel Decision in Brazil - Tyres Supports Safeguarding Environmental Values. ASIL Insights, 11(23).
Ruhaeni, N., & Aqimuddin, E. an. (2023). Halal food certification as an exception clause under the rule of the WTO-GATT: an Indonesia experience. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2260160.
Salsabila, F. (2023). Arbitrase dalam Dispute Settlement Understanding sebagai alternatif penyelesaian proses banding atas sengketa perdagangan internasional. Jurnal Hukum To-Ra: Hukum Untuk Mengatur Dan Melindungi Masyarakat, 9(3), 365–378.
Tania, S., Atkins, M., Cunningham, R., & Anawaratna, A. (2024). Reimagining the Special and Differential Treatment Provisions in the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding. Asian Journal of International Law, 14(1), 123–153.
Thapa, O. (2012). WTO Agreements and Environmental Issue: A Developing Countries Perspective.
Trachtman, J. P. (2017). WTO trade and environment jurisprudence: avoiding environmental catastrophe. Harvard International Law Journal, 58, 273.
World Trade Organization. (2017). Indonesia - Measures Concerning the Importation of Chicken Meat and Chicken Products. In Dispute Settlement Reports 2017 (Vol. 2017, Issue October). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108609906.001
Wu, C.-F. (2021). Challenges to protecting the right to health under the climate change regime. Health and Human Rights, 23(2), 121.
Yanai, A. (2013). Rethinking special and differential treatment in the WTO. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.
Yap, D. Y. P. (2024). Developing country status in the WTO: investigating self-designation and perpetuation of the “pretend” culture. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 23(1), 1–13.
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Abdul Razak Nasution, Muhammad Juang Rambe, Rahul Ardian Fikri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
