LEGAL RECONSTRUCTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY VALUATION INSTITUTIONS AS FIDUCIARY SECURITY TO REALIZE LEGAL CERTAINTY
Main Article Content
I. Irfan Ibrahiem
Elfrida Ratnawati
Simona Bustani
The utilization of Intellectual Property (IP) as an economic asset in Indonesia is significantly hampered when applied as fiduciary security due to profound legal uncertainty, particularly surrounding valuation mechanisms. A primary obstacle is the dearth of a standardized, legally recognized IP valuation institution, which inhibits the acceptance of IP as collateral by financial institutions. This study aims to analyze and reconstruct the legal framework governing these valuation institutions to establish legal certainty. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the research identifies key issues: inadequate existing regulations, and the rejection of IP by banks owing to valuation difficulties, value fluctuation risks, and execution uncertainties. The findings conclude that a legal reconstruction of the IP valuation institution is essential. This reconstruction must establish standardized valuation criteria and fortify the legal framework, thereby enabling IP to function as an effective financing instrument and realizing legal certainty in Indonesia.
Bank Indonesia. (2012). Peraturan Bank Indonesia (PBI) Nomor 14/15/PBI/2012 tentang Penilaian Kualitas Aset Bank Umum. Bank Indonesia.
Friedman, L. M. (1967). Legal Theory. Columbia University Press.
Government Regulation (PP) No. 24 of 2022 concerning Implementing Regulations for Law No. 24 of 2019 concerning Creative Economy. Sekretariat Negara.
Huda, M. C. (2023). Rekonstruksi Pengaturan Hak Cipta yang Dapat Dijadikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Berbasis Nilai Kemanfaatan. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.
Hudzaefi, H. (2023). Analisis Fikih Muamalah Dan undang-undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta terkait Nilai Hak Cipta sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Bandung Conference Series: Sharia Economic Law, 3(2), 119–126.
Kusumaatmadja, M. (1976). Hukum, Masyarakat dan Pembangunan. Binacipta.
Law No. 13 of 2016 concerning Patents. Sekretariat Negara.
Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. Sekretariat Negara.
Law No. 24 of 2019 concerning Creative Economy. Sekretariat Negara.
Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. Sekretariat Negara.
Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Security. Sekretariat Negara.
Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan. (2023). Analisis Risiko Penerimaan Hak Cipta Karya Kreatif sebagai Jaminan Kredit. Laporan Penelitian.
Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Brookings Institution Press.
Minister of Finance Regulation No. 101/PMK.01/2014 concerning Public Appraisers. Kementerian Keuangan.
Ridho, M. R. (2023). Hak Cipta sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank. Universitas Jambi.
Salim HS. (2014). Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.
Sardjono, A. (2010). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Pengetahuan Tradisional. Alumni.
Sari, M. Y., & Patria, R. Y. (2020). Tantangan Pemanfaatan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Solusi Permodalan. Law Review, 20(2), 111.
Sari, P. M. (2023). Problematika Valuasi Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Unes Law Review, 6(2), 5308.
Satrio, J. (2002). Hukum Jaminan, Hak Jaminan Kebendaan. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Smith, G. V., & Parr, R. L. (2000). Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Susilo, A. B. (2022). Rekonstruksi Pengaturan Hak Cipta yang dapat Dijadikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia berbasis Nilai Kemanfaatan [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024: Financing Innovation. WIPO.
Wulandari, S., Fuad, F., & Suartini, S. (2024). Valuasi Aset Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Jaminan Fidusia. Binamulia Hukum, 13(2), 543–554.
Zweigert, K., & Kötz, H. (1998). An Introduction to Comparative Law (3rd ed.). Clarendon Press.
