IMPLEMENTATION OF LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY OBJECTIONS TO SIMPLE LAWSUITS TO ACHIEVE JUSTICE
DOI:
10.54443/ijerlas.v5i6.4541Published:
2026-01-18Downloads
Abstract
This study examines the implementation of legal remedies for objections in small claims lawsuits at the Manado District Court based on PERMA No. 2 of 2015 in conjunction with PERMA No. 4 of 2019. The problem formulations include: (1) how to apply objections in small claims lawsuits; and (2) what efforts are made to realize justice in this mechanism. The study uses a socio-legal/juridical sociological approach by combining analysis of written legal norms and empirical data through literature studies, decision analysis, and interviews with judges and judicial officials. The results of the study indicate that procedurally and structurally, the objection mechanism at the Manado District Court is basically in accordance with the provisions of PERMA, both regarding procedures and deadlines, so that the principles of simplicity, speed, and low cost are relatively achieved. However, the justice realized is more prominent in the procedural aspect than in the substantive, especially for parties who are not accompanied by legal counsel and have difficulty compiling a legal objection memorandum. The study concludes that the main challenge lies in the legal culture and capacity of the actors, so that it is necessary to increase socialization, legal literacy, legal assistance, and technical guidelines so that objections in small claims are more effective and just.
Keywords:
gugatan sederhana, keberatan, keadilan, Pengadilan Negeri Manado.References
Bakri, S., Murwadji, T., Juwana, H., & Gunadi, A. (2023). Justice In The Implementation Of Small Claims Jurisdiction For The Parties To The Dispute. The Seybold Report, 17(105), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6616873
Harahap, M. Y. (2006). Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Harun, M. O. N. (2017). Pengantar Hukum Perdata. Malang: Setara Press.
Heniyatun. (2018). Hukum Acara Perdata. Magelang: UNIMMA PRESS.
Mansyur, R., & Witanto, D. Y. (2017). Gugatan Sederhana, Teori, Praktik, dan Permasalahannya. jakarta: Pustaka Dunia.
Muhammad, A. K. (2020). Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya.
Palsari, C. (2022). Kajian Pengantar Ilmu Hukum : Tujuan Dan Fungsi Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Dasar Fundamental Dalam Penjatuhan Putusan Pengadilan. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 4(3), 940–950. https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v4i3.43191
Paulson, B. L., & Paulson, S. L. (2006). Five Minutes of Legal Philosophy (1945). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 1–11.
Prodjodikoro, W. (2018). Hukum Perdata Tentang Persetujuan- persetujuan Tertentu. Bandung: Sumur Bandung.
Ratnasari, A. R., AFif, S., Kammaludin, A., Tinggi, S., Islam, A., Badar, A., & Purwakarta, C. (2023). Analisis Hukum Ekonomi Syariah tentang Label Halal Makanan di Kabupaten Subang: Pendekatan Tiga Identitas Menurut Teori Gustav Radbruch. Iqtishad Sharia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Dan Keuangan Islam, 1(1), 1–13.
Ruslya, N. M. L., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Widiati, I. A. P. (2021). Penyelesaian Perjanjian Kredit Terhadap Debitur yang Wanprestasi di Pt. Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Hari Depan Denpasar. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 2(3), 531–536. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.3.3631.531-536
Setiyawan, W. B. M., Utara, T. H., & Wulandari, F. D. (2019). Pembentukan Small Claim Court (Scc) Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan. Citizenship Jurnal Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 7(2), 72–81.
Suadi, A. (2023). Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Secara Manual dan Elektronik (2nd ed.). Jakarta: Kencana.
Sugeng, B., & Sujayadi. (2012). Pengantar Hukum Acara Perdata & Contoh Dokumen Litigasi Perkara Perdata. Jakarta: Kencana.
Supriyatna, M. R. (2019). Analisis Pelaksanaan Gugatan Sederhana Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (Perma) Nomor 14 Tahun 2016 Tentang Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Jo Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (Perma) Nomor 4 Tahun 2019 Tentan. Repository Universitas Pakuan, 1(1), 1–13.
Zuhriah, E., & Azmi, M. (2019). Model Small Claim Court Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara di Pengadilan Agama Perspektif Teori Keadilan John Rawls. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah, 11(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v11i2.6580
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dian Novita, Yenny Eta Widyanti, I Made Sukadana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
