Assessing the Implementation of Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) Based on Good Governance Principles in Ensuring Legal Certainty of Land Rights in Indonesia
DOI:
10.54443/ijerlas.v6i4.5614Published:
2026-07-30Abstract
This study aims to assess the implementation of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) program based on good governance principles in ensuring legal certainty of land rights in Indonesia. The research employs a qualitative method with a socio-legal approach, focusing on the empirical context of PTSL implementation in Barru Regency. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with officials of the National Land Agency (BPN), community participants, field observations, and document analysis. The collected data were systematically analyzed using NVivo 12 Pro to identify key themes related to governance practices, legal certainty, institutional roles, and implementation challenges.The findings indicate that the implementation of PTSL has generally adhered to structured administrative and technical procedures, including document verification, land measurement, and digital registration systems. The application of good governance principles is reflected in transparency through public outreach, accountability in procedural compliance, and participation involving local governments and communities. However, the study also identifies several persistent challenges, such as inaccuracies in legacy land certificates, overlapping land claims, and limitations in public administrative readiness, which may hinder the effectiveness of the program.Furthermore, the PTSL program has significantly contributed to strengthening legal certainty by formalizing land ownership, reducing the potential for disputes, and enhancing the socio-economic value of land. Legal certification provides stronger protection of property rights and facilitates access to economic resources, including financial services. Nevertheless, the sustainability and success of the program depend on accurate data submission, continuous institutional supervision, and strengthened coordination among stakeholders.In conclusion, the implementation of PTSL based on good governance principles plays a vital role in ensuring legal certainty of land rights in Indonesia. This study recommends improving data validation mechanisms, enhancing community awareness, and reinforcing institutional collaboration to optimize the effectiveness and long-term impact of the program
Keywords:
Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) Good Governance Land Administration Legal Certainty IndonesiaReferences
Aditya, T., Maria-Unger, E., van den Berg, C., Bennett, R., & Saers, P. (2020). Participatory land administration in Indonesia: Quality and usability assessment. Land, 9(3), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9030079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land9030079
Alden Wily, L. (2018). Collective land ownership in the 21st century: Overview of global trends. Land Use Policy, 79, 784–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land7020068
Anggitasari, A. M., Warka, M., & Sjaifurrachman, S. (2025). The concept of complete systematic land registration (PTSL) in providing legal certainty guarantees to land rights holders. International Journal of Sociology and Law, 2(3), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsl.v2i3.716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsl.v2i3.716
Ardhana, A. P., & Taupiqqurrahman. (2024). The implementation of the complete systematic land registration program as a framework for achieving agrarian reform. Jurnal Mercatoria, 17(2), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v17i2.13360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v17i2.13360
Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2017). The future ain't what it used to be: Forecasting the impact of ICT on the public sphere. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.05.002
Bell, K. C. (2016). Good governance in land administration. FIG Working Week. International Federation of Surveyors, https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2007/papers/ps_03/ps03_01_bell_2219.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Boone, C. (2019). Legal empowerment of the poor through property rights reform: Tensions and trade-offs of land registration and titling in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Development Studies, 55(3), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1451633 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1451633
Fitriani, N., & Wicaksono, A. (2022). Challenges of land administration in rural Indonesia: Evidence from systematic land registration programs. Journal of Rural Studies, 92, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.03.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.03.015
Grindle, M. S. (2017). Politics and policy implementation in developing countries. Princeton University Press. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781400886081/html?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Harsono, B., & Widodo, T. (2019). Bureaucratic constraints in land administration reform in Indonesia. Journal of Regulatory Governance, 13(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12235
Hidayat, R., & Sari, M. (2023). Public service responsiveness in land administration: Evidence from Indonesia’s land registration reform. Public Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.37808/paq.2023.47.2.3
Deininger, K., Selod, H., & Burns, A. (2017). The land governance assessment framework: Identifying and monitoring good practice in the land sector. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0840-0
Irmayanti, S., & Supriyanto, A. (2025). Qualitative research methods: Simple research with triangulation theory design. Develop, 5(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.25139/dev.v5i1.3690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25139/dev.v5i1.3690
Maulana, A., Utami, C., & Suryana, Y. (2021). An implementation review of the program of complete systematic land registration in Indonesia. Kolaborasi: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.26618/kjap.v8i1.7184
McDermott, C. L., Mahanty, S., & Schreckenberg, K. (2019). Examining equity: A multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services. Environmental Science & Policy, 33, 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006
Meijer, A., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2019). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317717758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429533
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2020). The rise of public integrity: The quest for corruption control. Journal of Democracy, 31(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0007
Okuda, M., & Gómez-Restrepo, C. (2005). Methods in qualitative research: Triangulation. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, 34(1), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-7450(14)60257-1
Pratama, R., Nugraha, A., & Santoso, B. (2021). Accessibility challenges in land registration services in developing regions. Land Use Policy, 109, 105699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105699
Ramadhani, R., Lubis, T. H., Lubis, U. S., & Koto, I. (2025). Land registration in Indonesia: Between policy and legal certainty. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, 24(2), 5841–5854. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6151
Risnawati, R., et al. (2025). Data analysis in qualitative research using the Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña interactive model. Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(6), 6290–6310. https://jes.ejournal.unri.ac.id
Sari, A. Z. P., Natalia, N. G., Cahya, R. W. N., & Rudiana, R. (2023). Good governance as an effort to increase public participation in development in Indonesia. JISPENDIORA Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Pendidikan dan Humaniora, 2(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.56910/jispendiora.v2i2.660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56910/jispendiora.v2i2.660
Sari, D. P., & Nugroho, A. (2023). Socio-cultural barriers in the implementation of land registration programs in rural Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 125, 106457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106457
Sutaryono, S., & Kurniawan, B. (2020). Institutional capacity and governance challenges in Indonesian land administration reform. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(11), 945–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1665684 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1665684
Syukur, S., Maryono, M., & Akkapin, S. (2025). The authority of the National Land Agency and the legal certainty of land in Indonesia. Journal Evidence of Law, 4(1), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v4i1.1056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v4i1.1056
Wahid, A., Ketut RH, I. G. A., & Karjoko, L. (2025). Reform of the land registration system in Indonesia: A Max Weberian rational-legal bureaucracy approach. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v20i2.13666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v20i2.13666
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/case-study-research-and-applications/book250150
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurdin, Mukmin Muhammad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
